Tootfinder

Oof, no, two days is not enough notice. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilnd.458024/gov.uscourts.ilnd.458024.29.0.pdf

Knowledge Graph Completion using Structural and Textual Embeddings
Sakher Khalil Alqaaidi, Krzysztof Kochut
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16206 https://

Knowledge Graph Completion using Structural and Textual Embeddings
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are widely employed in artificial intelligence applications, such as question-answering and recommendation systems. However, KGs are frequently found to be incomplete. While much of the existing literature focuses on predicting missing nodes for given incomplete KG triples, there remains an opportunity to complete KGs by exploring relations between existing nodes, a task known as relation prediction. In this study, we propose a relations prediction model that harnesses bo…

How accurately can quantitative imaging methods be ranked without ground truth: An upper bound on no-gold-standard evaluation
Yan Liu, Abhinav K. Jha
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16873

How accurately can quantitative imaging methods be ranked without ground truth: An upper bound on no-gold-standard evaluation
Objective evaluation of quantitative imaging (QI) methods with patient data, while important, is typically hindered by the lack of gold standards. To address this challenge, no-gold-standard evaluation (NGSE) techniques have been proposed. These techniques have demonstrated efficacy in accurately ranking QI methods without access to gold standards. The development of NGSE methods has raised an important question: how accurately can QI methods be ranked without ground truth. To answer this quest…

my "hey, let's meet again tomorrow, i will definitely not be going insane this time :)" dm is raising a lot of questions already answered by my dm

Data to view after voting, see above post
I found lots of websites (¹ ² ³ ⁴) claiming the correct answer is "specced" and only two (Merriam-Webster and Dictionary.com) that referred to the punctuated "spec'd", naming it as an alternative to "specced" with the same pronunciation. (Dictionary.com also named "specking" as a second alternative. I found nothing referring solely to "spec'd".)
However, Google Books Ngram Viewer has "spec'd" as the most common printed form until recently. Continuing the trend past 2019, "specced" should now have a narrow lead. In British English books (not shown), it overtook "spec'd" in 1997 and began a commanding lead in 2010.
Google web searches put "specced" at 3.01M results and "spec'd" at 8.69M, though almost all of the hits refer to "Spec-D" headlights. This is one major advantage of the Ngram Viewer, which doesn't trip over differing punctuation types (it shows "spec-d" at a trickle). It might be more fair to compare "specced out" (348k) with "spec'd out" (739k)

Imagine being so bad at your job of creating log-in systems that you have to outsource rate limiting to a CAPTCHA that punishes your actual legitimate users—especially one run by a third party.
Air Canada does this with Google’s obnoxious “train our driving vision ML to see motorcycles” recaptcha scam. It doesn’t accept my answers probably 90% of the time, so I have to try over and over and over. I hate it so much that I’d change airlines if I reasonably could.

Cory Doctorow (@pluralistic@mamot.fr)
Attached: 1 image Oh, fuck you, British Airways.

Public policy and health in the Trump era via The Lancet
“Trump exploited low and middle-income white people's anger over their deteriorating life prospects to mobilise racial animus and xenophobia and enlist their support for policies that benefit high-income people and corporations and threaten health.”

Data to view after voting, see above post
I found lots of websites (¹ ² ³ ⁴) claiming the correct answer is "specced" and only two (Merriam-Webster and Dictionary.com) that referred to the punctuated "spec'd", naming it as an alternative to "specced" with the same pronunciation. (Dictionary.com also named "specking" as a second alternative. I found nothing referring solely to "spec'd".)
However, Google Books Ngram Viewer has "spec'd" as the most common printed form until recently. Continuing the trend past 2019, "specced" should now have a narrow lead. In British English books (not shown), it overtook "spec'd" in 1997 and began a commanding lead in 2010.
Google web searches put "specced" at 3.01M results and "spec'd" at 8.69M, though almost all of the hits refer to "Spec-D" headlights. This is one major advantage of the Ngram Viewer, which doesn't trip over differing punctuation types (it shows "spec-d" at a trickle). It might be more fair to compare "specced out" (348k) with "spec'd out" (739k)