Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@DGIInfo@openbiblio.social
2026-05-27 20:30:11

Wie können, wie wollen wir in der #Zukunft leben?
In den Fängen von marktbeherrschenden #Internetkonzernen wie #Freemee oder als

@lapizistik@social.tchncs.de
2026-04-26 20:32:19

Ich hab keine Ahnung, wie der Phishing-Angriff auf Signal-Accounts im Detail aussah. Und die einfache Reaktion ist: „die sind alle zu dumm.“
Letztlich heißt das: die Menschen, die da Signal (oder andere Messenger) nutzen, haben kein gutes mentales Modell, das ihnen intuitiv erlaubt zu merken, wenn da irgendwas seltsam ist. Wir sind einfach nicht gut darin, Systeme zu bauen, die diesbezüglich von ihren Usern so gut verstanden werden- und Banken, die Newsletter von Domains Dritter versc…

@raiders@darktundra.xyz
2026-04-21 19:35:40

Is Malik Benson an answer for Raiders’ receiving corp in the draft? raiderswire.usatoday.com/story

A former U.S. Marine reservist and seven others were sentenced Tuesday to decades in prison over a shooting last year that wounded a police officer during a demonstration at a Texas immigration detention center.
Prosecutors called the crime an act of terrorism and said the eight were linked to a leftist militant group, antifa.
The defendants’ attorneys denied any antifa ties and family members expressed shock and anger over the stiff sentences.
Benjamin Song, the Marine reser…

@kubikpixel@chaos.social
2026-06-01 05:25:45

«KI-Modelle sind anfällig für wiederholte Angriffe:
Laut Forschern von Cisco versagen KI-Modelle bei realistischen Multi-Turn-Angriffen und lassen an Sicherheits-Benchmarks auf Basis weniger Prompts zweifeln.»
Der moderne Widerspruch ist die KI oder was ist es sonnst? So klug wie KI angeboten wird ist es einfach nicht.
🤖

@fanf@mendeddrum.org
2026-04-30 20:42:01

from my link log —
C hashmaps benchmarks.
martin.ankerl.com/2019/04/01/h
saved 2020-07-09

@publicvoit@graz.social
2026-04-18 15:47:28

Seit Jahren kann man offenbar bei einem gesperrten(!) #iPhone mit #Visa-Karte das hinterlegte Bankkonto leerräumen. Der bereits länger bekannte Angriff wurde mit 10.000$ nun demonstriert:

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2026-06-05 16:51:26

The largest US banks plan to launch a tokenized deposit network in 2027 to connect traditional payment rails with the infrastructure that digital assets run on (Wall Street Journal)
wsj.com/finance/banking/jpmorg

@burger_jaap@mastodon.social
2026-04-07 09:40:22

"...the real question is no longer whether Europe can afford to make the energy transition. It is whether it can afford not to. From a central banking perspective, the answer is clear."
ecb.europa.eu/press/blog/date/

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2026-06-11 15:00:02

Just finished "The Terraformers" by Annalee Newitz (@…). It was recommended as a "solarpunk" book, and I'm currently on a quest to find more speculative fiction as good as Le Guin or Butler, so I was eager to dig in. Having tagged the author (hi) I'll try to be polite here, but I'll admit I was disappointed.
Newitz clearly has a powerful imagination and there's lots of great stuff in the book, but it's not at all pushing boundaries in terms of imagining future societies. I think the message and intent was good in a lot of places, but off or self-contradictory in others. I absolutely adore the relatively small point made at the end about revolutions being complicated and not boiling down to heroes and battles, but despite the book's attempt to avoid that, I think it still falls into that pattern. Without too many spoilers, the way that some big problems are resolved near the end leans too much on a legal framework without questioning how it's enforced, and that resolution then means that a few heroic acts are enough to tip the balance, which undermines the point about messy histories.
The biggest contradiction of the book to my mind though is with a central theme. The book really explores a world in which "anyone of any species can be a person, as long as we just bioengineer them to be intelligent enough," and it tries to make a point about how engineering limited intelligences is cruel. At several points characters comment about how personhood shouldn't depend on intelligence. There's even a brief quote about how maybe rivers could be people... But... the point could have been "anyone can be a person, regardless of intelligence." This would have made for much more interesting philosophical territory to explore IMO (how do we then bound personhood; how do we reconcile predator/prey relations between persons, etc.). These are also questions that the indigenous traditions Newitz draws on (and consulted about, as mentioned in the acknowledgements) has interesting answers for, but we don't get to explore them through Newitz' world, and because the question of personhood regresses to the question of intelligence, it feels like the moral philosophy of the ERT folks isn't any better than the "InAss" they disparage.
It's not a bad book overall, even if it doesn't engage with the questions I'm hungry to see others engage with. Newitz' efforts to sketch out a more vibrant and diverse future are still monumental and inspiring in a lot of ways. I'm just still looking for something more. Ultimately, I think it lives up to the "solar" but not very much to the "punk."
#AmReading #ReadingNow #Bookstodon