Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-11-17 08:52:05

The implications are interesting enough when we apply this to systems like capitalism or national governments, but there are other very interesting implications when applied to systems like race or gender.
Like, as a cis man the only way I can be free to express and explore my own masculinity is if the masculinity I participate in is one which allows anyone the freedom to leave. Then I have an obligation to recognize the validity of nom-masculine trans identity as a necessary component of my own. If I fail to do this, then I trap myself in masculinity and allow the system to control me rather than me to be a free participant in the system.
But if it's OK to escape but not enter, that's it's own restriction that constrains the freedom to leave. It creates a barrier that keeps people in by the fear that they cannot return. So in order for me to be free in my cis masculine identity, I must accept non-masculine trans identities as they are and accept detransitioning as also valid.
But I also need to accept trans-masc identities because restricting entry to my masculinity means non-consensually constraining other identities. If every group imposes an exclusion against others coming in, that, by default, makes it impossible to leave every other group. This is just a description of how national borders work to trap people within systems, even if a nation itself allows people to "freely" leave.
So then, a free masculinity is one which recognizes all configurations of trans identities as valid and welcomes, if not celebrates, people who transition as affirmations of the freedom of their own identity (even for those who never feel a reason to exercise that same freedom).
The most irritating type of white person may look at this and say, "oh, so then why can't I be <not white>?" Except that the critique of transratial identities has never been "that's not allowed" and has always been "this person didn't do the work." If that person did the work, they would understand that the question doesn't make sense based on how race is constructed. That person might understand that race, especially whiteness, is more fluid than they at first understood. They might realize that whiteness is often chosen at the exclusion of other racialized identities. They would, perhaps, realize that to actually align with any racialized identity, they would first have to understand the boot of whiteness on their neck, have to recognize the need to destroy this oppressive identity for their own future liberation. The best, perhaps only, way to do this would be to use the privilege afforded by that identity to destroy it, and in doing so would either destroy their own privilege or destroy the system of privilege. The must either become themselves completely ratialized or destroy the system of race itself such being "transracial" wouldn't really make sense anymore.
But that most annoying of white person would, of course, not do any such work. Nevertheless, one hopes that they may recognize the paradox that they are trapped by their white identity, forced forever by it to do the work of maintaining it. And such is true for all privileged identities, where privilege is only maintained through restrictions where these restrictions ultimately become walls that imprison both the privileged and the marginalized in a mutually reinforcing hell that can only be escaped by destroying the system of privilege itself.

@carloshr@lile.cl
2025-11-15 16:54:43

RE: altgr.xyz/2025/11/14/tu-falta-
He comenzado la sección de "Extractos" en mi blog. Videos con algunos minutos de canciones grabadas en conciertos a los que voy. <…

@midtsveen@social.linux.pizza
2025-11-13 16:21:29

Is any comrades able to give me an invite code to #RiseUp mail?
@…
@…

@salrandolph@zirk.us
2026-01-03 17:04:44

Happy New Year! May this coming year offer you liberation.
I’m thrilled to have two excerpts from a manuscript, You Must be an Image to Survive, You Must be a Text to Be Found,in the new issue of Works & Days from out now from Beautiful Days Press.
I’ll also be reading at the launch on January 15 in Brooklyn.

@blakes7bot@mas.torpidity.net
2025-10-21 21:19:51

Series A, Episode 09 - Project Avalon
BLAKE: Chevner, the security robot. [Into communicator] Avon! Cally! Bring us up!
[Scene: Cuts between the Liberator and the tunnel.]
ZEN: Liberator has resumed original position and status.
blake.torpidity.net/m/109/312 B7B6

Claude 3.7 describes the image as: "The image shows two people in a scene that appears to be set in some kind of small enclosed space with metallic walls, possibly an elevator or small compartment. Both individuals are wearing winter clothing with fur-trimmed hoods. The person on the left wears a green jacket with gloves, while the person on the right is in a burgundy/red jacket with what looks like a utility belt. There's a reflection visible in what seems to be a glass or metal surface betwee…
@doktrock@toad.social
2025-10-29 19:19:37

🚨Job Alert!!🚨Assistant Professor - Mineral Science - University of Houston, Texas. High-temperature #geochemistry, #Mineralogy, igneous #petrology, and/or

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-01 11:09:47

Taking notes from the successes and failures of the Russian revolution, a group of anarchists (including Nestor Makhno, a Ukrainian anarchist militant who was critical in defeating the Tzar's army and who later also fought the Red Army) wrote a document titled the "Organizational Platform of the Libertarian Communists." This document came to be known as "The Platform." It remains one of the most important first-hand revolutionary documents, outlining a clear revolutionary plan.
I've taken this, the Viable System Model from cybernetics, and my own organizing experience, to describe an organization to confront the current set of crises.
This continues to build on the stuff I have been writing, but it's a lot less high level theory and a lot more specific.
anarchoccultism.org/building-z
As always, editing notes (typos, grammar, spelling, etc) are always welcome, as are any questions. My ADHD brain tends to go a lot faster than anything else, so I have a tendency to drop words and have a lot of trouble catching them later. Between my ADHD and mild dyslexia, it can be pretty hard for me to catch when autocorrect gives me the wrong word.
A lot of folks have already been super helpful in offering their editing support, and I'm really grateful. Writing this has felt collaborative, and it should. On the one hand this comes from my own experience and research, but on the other I'm also voicing things that have come from conversations here. This has all been a bit of my voice and a bit of the federated world, and I'm really appreciating that.