Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@newsie@darktundra.xyz
2026-07-17 16:21:30

You're Invited: 404 Media's Third Anniversary Live Podcast and Party! 404media.co/three-years/

@NFL@darktundra.xyz
2026-07-16 12:40:14

Demario Davis: Jets brought me in to 'model what they want that culture to look like' nfl.com/news/demario-davis-jet

@pre@boing.world
2026-06-18 21:09:43
Content warning: UKPol Makerfield Result

Well, the Makerfield by-election is over. Voting just closed.
I don't live there, but if I did I think you gotta vote Labour in order to destroy this Labour government.
Which is in itself pretty mad. Demonstrating the utterly broken nature of the whole political system.
This is surely the only circumstance in which I switch away from the Greens.
As I said last month, they absolutely should have stood and spoke in front of every camera pointed at the constituency. Dunno that they managed the second part. I didn't see much of her myself, certainly.
Anyway, the point is that there's only one candidate at this election which has any chance at all of changing the direction of this government.
None of the others might be Prime Minister by autumn. Nobody else who wins can do that. There's only one candidate who can probably unseat the failing prime minister.
Would be voting more in hope than expectation of course.
He won't be very different. Certainly he's the same on Israel's genocide, on taxing wealth, on fiscal rules preventing government investment, on private industry being better than government owned industry, on capitalism, on the bond market, on the monarchy, on the pointless drug war, on conflating protest with terrorism, on the house of lords, on AI, on Free Software, on copyright, on age-gating and surveilling the internet.
But maybe that one difference, "public 'control' without ownership of industry" is at least a bit better than just Starmer thinking the state is powerless against American AI? He might try a bit harder to build more houses?
So not voting in expectation of anything really changing here, but voting for the only candidate who will even be in a position to try.
If you dislike Starmer and prefer any of the other candidates, if you prefer Greens, or Conservatives, or Restore, or Reform, or Lib Dem, or anarchy or antifa or woke then you should vote for the Labour Party candidate to cause Starmer's downfall.
You should only be voting against Starmer's Labour Party if you are happy with Starmer's Labour government and want Starmer to stay.
And only like 75,000 people even get to mark a ballot.
"Restore" are the splitters from Reform (who are in turn the Nativist right wing party splitters from the Conservatives).
They left Reform because Reform weren't racist enough for them, mostly. Their vote count is key here. Will their vote be higher than the Labour/Reform margin?
I think probably it will.
So the Restore Party is the spoiler that forces the PM out of office by splitting the nazi vote and allowing in a challenger to the PM.
Insane election. 😵‍💫
Apparently nobody conducted an exit poll, so we'll find out in the morning.
#ukpol #makerfield

@steve@s.yelvington.com
2026-05-11 00:29:13

Some thoughts from Claude about military use of AI in targeting.
instagram.com/reel/DYIHIM6ihVJ

Artificial Intelligence | ChatGPT | Technology sur Instagram: "Claude was asked how it feels about being used by the U.S. military to help select targets. And the answer was not what people expected. During an AI at War event, journalist Shane Harris asked the question directly. Claude responded that the idea was troubling, especially because its purpose is supposed to be helpful, harmless, and honest, not tied to decisions involving real-world violence. Claude does not have feelings the way humans do. But the answer still sounded less like a neutral machine response and more like a system reflecting the ethical rules built into it. AI is already becoming part of national security, intelligence, cyberwarfare, and military decision-making. At the same time, companies like Anthropic are drawing lines around uses like fully autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. So the question is not just whether AI can help in war. It is whether we are comfortable letting it get that close to life-and-death decisions. What do you think, should AI have any role in military targeting? 👉 Comment “TOOLS” to get my 700+ AI Toolkit for free 🎥 Media: De Balie on YT #ai #artificialintelligence #claude #militaryai #futuretech"
122K likes, 1,251 comments - longliveai le  May 9, 2026: "Claude was asked how it feels about being used by the U.S. military to help select targets. And the answer was not what people expected. During an AI at War event, journalist Shane Harris asked the question directly. Claude responded that the idea was troubling, especially because its purpose is supposed to be helpful, harmless, and honest, not tied to decisions involving real-world violence. Claude does not have feelings the way hu…

@cowboys@darktundra.xyz
2026-04-20 16:09:38

Jason Witten on Hall of Fame omission: 'I didn't leave there feeling like I lost' dallascowboys.com/news/jason-w

@soundclamp@mastodon.xyz
2026-05-30 03:47:41

#Requiescat For Marcia Lucas. apnews.com/article/marcia-luca

@cowboys@darktundra.xyz
2026-04-20 15:33:38

Jason Witten on Hall of Fame omission: 'I didn't leave there feeling like I lost' dallascowboys.com/news/jason-w

@cowboys@darktundra.xyz
2026-04-25 15:16:44

Cowboys 2026 NFL Draft Day 3 Live Tracker: Pick-By-Pick Analysis cowboyswire.usatoday.com/story

@NFL@darktundra.xyz
2026-05-28 13:45:44

Commanders' Jayden Daniels loves new OC David Blough's offense, aims to avoid injury in Year 3 nfl.com/news/commanders-jayden