Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@stefan@gardenstate.social
2025-06-27 19:47:39

I've seen 51 of these top 100 movies from the nytimes
worldofreel.com/blog/2025/6/23

@arXiv_csLO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-29 07:42:21

Scroll nets
Pablo Donato
arxiv.org/abs/2507.19689 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.19689

@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de
2025-07-31 00:00:04

messal_shale: Messel Shale food web (2014)
A network of feeling links among taxa based on the 48 million years old uppermost early Eocene Messel Shale. Edge property 'certainty' denotes the certainty of the edge. Metadata include evidence, habitat, and trophic roles. The edge direction goes from consumer to resource.
This network has 700 nodes and 6444 edges.
Tags: Biological, Food Web, Uncertain, Weighted, Metadata

messal_shale: Messel Shale food web (2014). 700 nodes, 6444 edges. https://networks.skewed.de/net/messal_shale
@sean@scoat.es
2025-07-29 18:39:20

Uh-oh, it looks like you’ve stumbled on some content that needs age verification.
Enter the following 7 digits:
𝑒𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉 𝓈𝒾𝓍 𝓈𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓃 𝒻𝒾𝓋𝑒 𝓉𝒽𝓇𝑒𝑒 𝓏𝑒𝓇𝑜 𝓃𝒾𝓃𝑒

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-30 08:58:02

Eliciting User Requirements for AI-Enhanced Learning Environments using a Participatory Approach
Bibeg Limbu, Irene-Angelica Chounta, Vilma Sukacke, Andromachi Filippidi, Chara Spyropoulou, Marianna Anagnostopoulou, Eleftheria Tsourlidaki, Nikos Karacapilidis
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21088

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-28 13:04:34

How popular media gets love wrong
Okay, so what exactly are the details of the "engineered" model of love from my previous post? I'll try to summarize my thoughts and the experiences they're built on.
1. "Love" can be be thought of like a mechanism that's built by two (or more) people. In this case, no single person can build the thing alone, to work it needs contributions from multiple people (I suppose self-love might be an exception to that). In any case, the builders can intentionally choose how they build (and maintain) the mechanism, they can build it differently to suit their particular needs/wants, and they will need to maintain and repair it over time to keep it running. It may need winding, or fuel, or charging plus oil changes and bolt-tightening, etc.
2. Any two (or more) people can choose to start building love between them at any time. No need to "find your soulmate" or "wait for the right person." Now the caveat is that the mechanism is difficult to build and requires lots of cooperation, so there might indeed be "wrong people" to try to build love with. People in general might experience more failures than successes. The key component is slowly-escalating shared commitment to the project, which is negotiated between the partners so that neither one feels like they've been left to do all the work themselves. Since it's a big scary project though, it's very easy to decide it's too hard and give up, and so the builders need to encourage each other and pace themselves. The project can only succeed if there's mutual commitment, and that will certainly require compromise (sometimes even sacrifice, though not always). If the mechanism works well, the benefits (companionship; encouragement; praise; loving sex; hugs; etc.) will be well worth the compromises you make to build it, but this isn't always the case.
3. The mechanism is prone to falling apart if not maintained. In my view, the "fire" and "appeal" models of love don't adequately convey the need for this maintenance and lead to a lot of under-maintained relationships many of which fall apart. You'll need to do things together that make you happy, do things that make your partner happy (in some cases even if they annoy you, but never in a transactional or box-checking way), spend time with shared attention, spend time alone and/or apart, reassure each other through words (or deeds) of mutual beliefs (especially your continued commitment to the relationship), do things that comfort and/or excite each other physically (anywhere from hugs to hand-holding to sex) and probably other things I'm not thinking of. Not *every* relationship needs *all* of these maintenance techniques, but I think most will need most. Note especially that patriarchy teaches men that they don't need to bother with any of this, which harms primarily their romantic partners but secondarily them as their relationships fail due to their own (cultivated-by-patriarchy) incompetence. If a relationship evolves to a point where one person is doing all the maintenance (& improvement) work, it's been bent into a shape that no longer really qualifies as "love" in my book, and that's super unhealthy.
4. The key things to negotiate when trying to build a new love are first, how to work together in the first place, and how to be comfortable around each others' habits (or how to change those habits). Second, what level of commitment you have right now, and what how/when you want to increase that commitment. Additionally, I think it's worth checking in about what you're each putting into and getting out of the relationship, to ensure that it continues to be positive for all participants. To build a successful relationship, you need to be able to incrementally increase the level of commitment to one that you're both comfortable staying at long-term, while ensuring that for both partners, the relationship is both a net benefit and has manageable costs (those two things are not the same). Obviously it's not easy to actually have conversations about these things (congratulations if you can just talk about this stuff) because there's a huge fear of hearing an answer that you don't want to hear. I think the range of discouraging answers which actually spell doom for a relationship is smaller than people think and there's usually a reasonable "shoulder" you can fall into where things aren't on a good trajectory but could be brought back into one, but even so these conversations are scary. Still, I think only having honest conversations about these things when you're angry at each other is not a good plan. You can also try to communicate some of these things via non-conversational means, if that feels safer, and at least being aware that these are the objectives you're pursuing is probably helpful.
I'll post two more replies here about my own experiences that led me to this mental model and trying to distill this into advice, although it will take me a moment to get to those.
#relationships #love

@arXiv_condmatmtrlsci_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-29 09:59:21

Control of polarization and polar chiral textures in BiFeO$_3$ by epitaxial strain and interfacial chemistry
Elzbieta Gradauskaite, Natascha Gray, Quintin N. Meier, Marta D. Rossell, Morgan Trassin
arxiv.org/abs/2508.20930

@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de
2025-06-30 12:00:04

messal_shale: Messel Shale food web (2014)
A network of feeling links among taxa based on the 48 million years old uppermost early Eocene Messel Shale. Edge property 'certainty' denotes the certainty of the edge. Metadata include evidence, habitat, and trophic roles. The edge direction goes from consumer to resource.
This network has 700 nodes and 6444 edges.
Tags: Biological, Food Web, Uncertain, Weighted, Metadata

messal_shale: Messel Shale food web (2014). 700 nodes, 6444 edges. https://networks.skewed.de/net/messal_shale
@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de
2025-07-31 04:00:03

sp_high_school_new: High school dynamic contacts (2011-2012)
These datasets contain the temporal network of contacts between students in a high school in Marseilles, France. The first dataset gives the contacts of the students of three classes during 4 days in Dec. 2011, and the second corresponds to the contacts of the students of 5 classes during 7 days (from a Monday to the Tuesday of the following week) in Nov. 2012.
This network has 180 nodes and 45047 edges.
Tags: Soc…

sp_high_school_new: High school dynamic contacts (2011-2012). 180 nodes, 45047 edges. https://networks.skewed.de/net/sp_high_school_new#2012
@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de
2025-07-31 03:00:04

sp_high_school_new: High school dynamic contacts (2011-2012)
These datasets contain the temporal network of contacts between students in a high school in Marseilles, France. The first dataset gives the contacts of the students of three classes during 4 days in Dec. 2011, and the second corresponds to the contacts of the students of 5 classes during 7 days (from a Monday to the Tuesday of the following week) in Nov. 2012.
This network has 126 nodes and 28561 edges.
Tags: Soc…

sp_high_school_new: High school dynamic contacts (2011-2012). 126 nodes, 28561 edges. https://networks.skewed.de/net/sp_high_school_new#2011