Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-07 07:34:03

MagicGUI: A Foundational Mobile GUI Agent with Scalable Data Pipeline and Reinforcement Fine-tuning
Liujian Tang, Shaokang Dong, Yijia Huang, Minqi Xiang, Hongtao Ruan, Bin Wang, Shuo Li, Zhihui Cao, Hailiang Pang, Heng Kong, He Yang, Mingxu Chai, Zhilin Gao, Xingyu Liu, Yingnan Fu, Jiaming Liu, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang, Yu-Gang Jiang, Qi Zhang, Kang Wang, Yunke Zhang, Yuran Wang

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-06 10:35:50

R2GenKG: Hierarchical Multi-modal Knowledge Graph for LLM-based Radiology Report Generation
Futian Wang, Yuhan Qiao, Xiao Wang, Fuling Wang, Yuxiang Zhang, Dengdi Sun
arxiv.org/abs/2508.03426

@NFL@darktundra.xyz
2025-08-03 16:35:35

Colts WR Adonai Mitchell feeling comfortable in Year 2: 'I knew it would eventually come together' nfl.com/news/colts-wr-adonai-m

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2025-09-29 16:35:40

Flying Tulip, founded by DeFi veteran Andre Cronje aiming to build a full-stack onchain exchange, raised a $200M seed at a $1B token valuation (Yogita Khatri/The Block)
theblock.co/post/372787/andre-

@haayman@todon.nl
2025-07-22 05:42:01

BREAKTHROUGH: Belgian Authorities Arrest and Interrogate Israeli War Crimes Suspects Following Complaint by Hind Rajab Foundation and GLAN - THE HIND RAJAB FOUNDATION
hindr…

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-01 08:40:03

A Survey of Scientific Large Language Models: From Data Foundations to Agent Frontiers
Ming Hu, Chenglong Ma, Wei Li, Wanghan Xu, Jiamin Wu, Jucheng Hu, Tianbin Li, Guohang Zhuang, Jiaqi Liu, Yingzhou Lu, Ying Chen, Chaoyang Zhang, Cheng Tan, Jie Ying, Guocheng Wu, Shujian Gao, Pengcheng Chen, Jiashi Lin, Haitao Wu, Lulu Chen, Fengxiang Wang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xiangyu Zhao, Feilong Tang, Encheng Su, Junzhi Ning, Xinyao Liu, Ye Du, Changkai Ji, Cheng Tang, Huihui Xu, Ziyang Chen, Ziyan Hu…

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-03 10:44:31

Inferring Dynamic Physical Properties from Video Foundation Models
Guanqi Zhan, Xianzheng Ma, Weidi Xie, Andrew Zisserman
arxiv.org/abs/2510.02311

@tante@tldr.nettime.org
2025-09-19 10:11:49

"The Free Software Foundation has been sliding into irrelevance more and more by entirely failing to address its big Creepy Uncle problem. Open-Source has turned into a form of unpaid internship to be hired to make shitty apps that bring more surveillance and ads to our world."
aria.dog/barks/forklift…

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-28 10:41:42

How popular media gets love wrong
Had some thoughts in response to a post about loneliness on here. As the author emphasized, reassurances from people who got lucky are not terribly comforting to those who didn't, especially when the person who was lucky had structural factors in their favor that made their chances of success much higher than those is their audience. So: these are just my thoughts, and may not have any bearing on your life. I share them because my experience challenged a lot of the things I was taught to believe about love, and I think my current beliefs are both truer and would benefit others seeing companionship.
We're taught in many modern societies from an absurdly young age that love is not something under our control, and that dating should be a process of trying to kindle love with different people until we meet "the one" with whom it takes off. In the slightly-less-fairytale corners of modern popular media, we might fund an admission that it's possible to influence love, feeding & tending the fire in better or worse ways. But it's still modeled as an uncontrollable force of nature, to be occasionally influenced but never tamed. I'll call this the "fire" model of love.
We're also taught (and non-boys are taught more stringently) a second contradictory model of love: that in a relationship, we need to both do things and be things in order to make our partner love us, and that if we don't, our partner's love for us will wither, and (especially if you're not a boy) it will be our fault. I'll call this the "appeal" model of love.
Now obviously both of these cannot be totally true at once, and plenty of popular media centers this contradiction, but there are really very few competing models on offer.
In my experience, however, it's possible to have "pre-meditated" love. In other words, to decide you want to love someone (or at least, try loving them), commit to that idea, and then actually wind up in love with them (and them with you, although obviously this second part is not directly under your control). I'll call this the "engineered" model of love.
Now, I don't think that the "fire" and "appeal" models of love are totally wrong, but I do feel their shortcomings often suggest poor & self-destructive relationship strategies. I do think the "fire" model is a decent model for *infatuation*, which is something a lot of popular media blur into love, and which drives many (but not all) of the feelings we normally associate with love (even as those feelings have other possible drivers too). I definitely experienced strong infatuation early on in my engineered relationship (ugh that sounds terrible but I'll stick with it; I promise no deception was involved). I continue to experience mild infatuation years later that waxes and wanes. It's not a stable foundation for a relationship but it can be a useful component of one (this at least popular media depicts often).
I'll continue these thoughts in a reply, by it might take a bit to get to it.
#relationships

@Jeff@mastodon.opencloud.lu
2025-08-16 05:55:10

• Foundations for OT Cybersecurity: Asset Inventory Guidance for Owners and Operators
13 August 2025
site: cisa.gov/resources-tools/resou