Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@usul@piaille.fr
2025-10-11 04:57:46

Le MIT est la première université Š refuser de signer l’accord sur l’éducation supérieure de l’administration Trump
lemonde.fr/international/artic

@soundclamp@mastodon.xyz
2025-09-11 01:27:41

😬 techcrunch.com/2025/09/10/vime

@burger_jaap@mastodon.social
2025-11-11 18:19:21

🚜 Electrification will change the farm. Swappable batteries, bidirectional charging and on-site solar charging
fwi.co.uk/machinery/tractors/a

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2025-10-10 16:15:55

A group of American investors led by Hollywood producer Robert Simonds has agreed to acquire NSO Group in a deal valued at "several tens of millions of dollars" (Omer Kabir/CTech)
calcalistech.com/ctechnews/art

@ubuntourist@mastodon.social
2025-09-10 14:40:06

“According to our president, there’s only two genders..."
Also according to him experiments with injecting bleach, shining UV lights up your ass, hydroxychloroquine, etc. should be pursued. I hope said student is following that advice too.
theguardian.c…

@Dragofix@veganism.social
2025-09-12 01:25:41

Corporate reports miss the mark on ocean health, according to new analysis #ocean

@sascha_wolfer@fediscience.org
2025-10-10 06:05:44

One other thing, while we don't claim that our mixed-effects logit model is the perfect way to account for non-independence between languages, we don't think it's correct, as Xia & Lindell assert, to just claim that our results are "counterintuitive", the fix-eff estimates are "unreliable" and that the high model fits are "unrealistic." Whether a mix model better captures the data-generat. process is ultimately an empirical question, not one to be decided by assertion. Take, for instance, our finding that once random effects for either subregion or language family are included, the estimated effect of L1_population reverses direction—from the negative value reported by Xia & Lindell et al. to a positive one.

@EgorKotov@datasci.social
2025-09-10 08:59:43

From a Q2 (according to Elsevier Scopus ) journal asking for a review. They are not even trying. According to them, I have an "expertise in areas related to linguistics (if any)" [I love this "if any"!] , makes me "an ideal candidate to review the manuscript".

Dear E.A. Koto,
Hope you are well.
We are contacting you because your expertise in areas related to linguistics (if any)
makes you an ideal candidate to review the manuscript entitled "I.

submitted to@he Forum for Linguistic Studies (FLS). §)e manuscript
summary is provided below for YSummgierence:
[This study examines the morphological patterns of three languages—

I Focusing
on bound morphemes, both derivational and inflectional, the research adopts a
Forum for Linguistic Studies
COUNTRY SUB…
@arXiv_mathLO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-10 08:08:59

A formal system for reasoning about assertibility, truth, and meaningfulness
Nik Weaver
arxiv.org/abs/2510.07641 arxiv.org/pdf/2510.07641…