Tootfinder

BKA nennt Identität des mutmaßlichem Chefs der Trickbot-Bande
Das Bundeskriminalamt sucht mit Namen und Gesicht nach dem mutmaßlichen Kopf der berüchtigten Trickbot-Bande. Er gilt als ein Pionier der Cyberkriminalität.

Reform led Nottinghamshire Council is blacklisting journalists for asking questions. An outrageous attack on press freedom. Sign the petition to get them to reverse this decision: https://

Reform: Stop hiding from press scrutiny!
Nigel Farage says he welcomes freedom of speech, even if people find it offensive. Surely that should apply to freedom of the press too? So why have Reform's Nottinghamshire councillors - who control the county council - been banned from talking to the Nottingham Post & Nottinghamshire Live, just because we wrote an article they didn't like? Our report asked legitimate questions about local government restructuring. That's our job. When councillors pick and choose which journalists get to...

"They’re unknowingly becoming the bad guys”: AI-powered bounty hunters think they’re helping, but their fabricated bug reports are overwhelming solo maintainers like cURL’s Daniel Stenberg—who’s paid $92K for real flaws and now may scrap the program.
https://www.

Subtooting since people in the original thread wanted it to be over, but selfishly tagging @… and @… whose opinions I value...
I think that saying "we are not a supply chain" is exactly what open-source maintainers should be doing right now in response to "open source supply chain security" threads.
I can't claim to be an expert and don't maintain any important FOSS stuff, but I do release almost all of my code under open licenses, and I do use many open source libraries, and I have felt the pain of needing to replace an unmaintained library.
There's a certain small-to-mid-scale class of program, including many open-source libraries, which can be built/maintained by a single person, and which to my mind best operate on a "snake growth" model: incremental changes/fixes, punctuated by periodic "skin-shedding" phases where make rewrites or version updates happen. These projects aren't immortal either: as the whole tech landscape around them changes, they become unnecessary and/or people lose interest, so they go unmaintained and eventually break. Each time one of their dependencies breaks (or has a skin-shedding moment) there's a higher probability that they break or shed too, as maintenance needs shoot up at these junctures. Unless you're a company trying to make money from a single long-lived app, it's actually okay that software churns like this, and if you're a company trying to make money, your priorities absolutely should not factor into any decisions people making FOSS software make: we're trying (and to a huge extent succeeding) to make a better world (and/or just have fun with our own hobbies share that fun with others) that leaves behind the corrosive & planet-destroying plague which is capitalism, and you're trying to personally enrich yourself by embracing that plague. The fact that capitalism is *evil* is not an incidental thing in this discussion.
To make an imperfect analogy, imagine that the peasants of some domain have set up a really-free-market, where they provide each other with free stuff to help each other survive, sometimes doing some barter perhaps but mostly just everyone bringing their surplus. Now imagine the lord of the domain, who is the source of these peasants' immiseration, goes to this market secretly & takes some berries, which he uses as one ingredient in delicious tarts that he then sells for profit. But then the berry-bringer stops showing up to the free market, or starts bringing a different kind of fruit, or even ends up bringing rotten berries by accident. And the lord complains "I have a supply chain problem!" Like, fuck off dude! Your problem is that you *didn't* want to build a supply chain and instead thought you would build your profit-focused business in other people's free stuff. If you were paying the berry-picker, you'd have a supply chain problem, but you weren't, so you really have an "I want more free stuff" problem when you can't be arsed to give away your own stuff for free.
There can be all sorts of problems in the really-free-market, like maybe not enough people bring socks, so the peasants who can't afford socks are going barefoot, and having foot problems, and the peasants put their heads together and see if they can convince someone to start bringing socks, and maybe they can't and things are a bit sad, but the really-free-market was never supposed to solve everyone's problems 100% when they're all still being squeezed dry by their taxes: until they are able to get free of the lord & start building a lovely anarchist society, the really-free-market is a best-effort kind of deal that aims to make things better, and sometimes will fall short. When it becomes the main way goods in society are distributed, and when the people who contribute aren't constantly drained by the feudal yoke, at that point the availability of particular goods is a real problem that needs to be solved, but at that point, it's also much easier to solve. And at *no* point does someone coming into the market to take stuff only to turn around and sell it deserve anything from the market or those contributing to it. They are not a supply chain. They're trying to help each other out, but even then they're doing so freely and without obligation. They might discuss amongst themselves how to better coordinate their mutual aid, but they're not going to end up forcing anyone to bring anything or even expecting that a certain person contribute a certain amount, since the whole point is that the thing is voluntary & free, and they've all got changing life circumstances that affect their contributions. Celebrate whatever shows up at the market, express your desire for things that would be useful, but don't impose a burden on anyone else to bring a specific thing, because otherwise it's fair for them to oppose such a burden on you, and now you two are doing your own barter thing that's outside the parameters of the really-free-market.

Beyond Accuracy: How AI Metacognitive Sensitivity improves AI-assisted Decision Making
ZhaoBin Li, Mark Steyvers
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22365 https://a…

Beyond Accuracy: How AI Metacognitive Sensitivity improves AI-assisted Decision Making
In settings where human decision-making relies on AI input, both the predictive accuracy of the AI system and the reliability of its confidence estimates influence decision quality. We highlight the role of AI metacognitive sensitivity -- its ability to assign confidence scores that accurately distinguish correct from incorrect predictions -- and introduce a theoretical framework for assessing the joint impact of AI's predictive accuracy and metacognitive sensitivity in hybrid decision-making s…

Series B, Episode 01 - Redemption
AVON: Don't worry. At the right time, I will remind you of it.
[Flight deck]
VILA: [Accepts cup from Jenna and swallows pill] Thanks.
JENNA: [To Blake who has just entered flight deck with Avon] You all right?
https://blake.torpidity.net/m/201/242

Blakes7Bot | Search
Companion site to the Blakes7Bot Twitter, Mastodon, and Bluesky accounts. Automated lines of Blakes 7 dialog. Includes a script search facility.

Dark sector search at BESIII
Zhijun Li, Zhengyun You
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22402 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.22402

Dark sector search at BESIII
The Standard Model has achieved significant success in particle physics; however, there are still some unresolved puzzles beyond it. This motivates the exploration of the dark sector. We present the recent dark sector search results from BESIII experiment, which include the search for axion-like particles in the $J/ψ$ data set, the search for muon-philic particles in muon radiation, the search for massless dark photons in $D^0\toωγ'$ and $D^0\toγγ'$, and the search for invisible decays of …

MCFuser: High-Performance and Rapid Fusion of Memory-Bound Compute-Intensive Operators
Zheng Zhang, Donglin Yang, Xiaobo Zhou, Dazhao Cheng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22169

MCFuser: High-Performance and Rapid Fusion of Memory-Bound Compute-Intensive Operators
Operator fusion, a key technique to improve data locality and alleviate GPU memory bandwidth pressure, often fails to extend to the fusion of multiple compute-intensive operators due to saturated computation throughput. However, the dynamicity of tensor dimension sizes could potentially lead to these operators becoming memory-bound, necessitating the generation of fused kernels, a task hindered by limited search spaces for fusion strategies, redundant memory access, and prolonged tuning time, l…

Research Challenges and Progress in the End-to-End V2X Cooperative Autonomous Driving Competition
Ruiyang Hao, Haibao Yu, Jiaru Zhong, Chuanye Wang, Jiahao Wang, Yiming Kan, Wenxian Yang, Siqi Fan, Huilin Yin, Jianing Qiu, Yao Mu, Jiankai Sun, Li Chen, Walter Zimmer, Dandan Zhang, Shanghang Zhang, Mac Schwager, Wei Huang, Xiaobo Zhang, Ping Luo, Zaiqing Nie
htt…

Research Challenges and Progress in the End-to-End V2X Cooperative Autonomous Driving Competition
With the rapid advancement of autonomous driving technology, vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication has emerged as a key enabler for extending perception range and enhancing driving safety by providing visibility beyond the line of sight. However, integrating multi-source sensor data from both ego-vehicles and infrastructure under real-world constraints, such as limited communication bandwidth and dynamic environments, presents significant technical challenges. To facilitate research in this…