@tiotasram@kolektiva.social2025-07-28 10:41:42
How popular media gets love wrong
Had some thoughts in response to a post about loneliness on here. As the author emphasized, reassurances from people who got lucky are not terribly comforting to those who didn't, especially when the person who was lucky had structural factors in their favor that made their chances of success much higher than those is their audience. So: these are just my thoughts, and may not have any bearing on your life. I share them because my experience challenged a lot of the things I was taught to believe about love, and I think my current beliefs are both truer and would benefit others seeing companionship.
We're taught in many modern societies from an absurdly young age that love is not something under our control, and that dating should be a process of trying to kindle love with different people until we meet "the one" with whom it takes off. In the slightly-less-fairytale corners of modern popular media, we might fund an admission that it's possible to influence love, feeding & tending the fire in better or worse ways. But it's still modeled as an uncontrollable force of nature, to be occasionally influenced but never tamed. I'll call this the "fire" model of love.
We're also taught (and non-boys are taught more stringently) a second contradictory model of love: that in a relationship, we need to both do things and be things in order to make our partner love us, and that if we don't, our partner's love for us will wither, and (especially if you're not a boy) it will be our fault. I'll call this the "appeal" model of love.
Now obviously both of these cannot be totally true at once, and plenty of popular media centers this contradiction, but there are really very few competing models on offer.
In my experience, however, it's possible to have "pre-meditated" love. In other words, to decide you want to love someone (or at least, try loving them), commit to that idea, and then actually wind up in love with them (and them with you, although obviously this second part is not directly under your control). I'll call this the "engineered" model of love.
Now, I don't think that the "fire" and "appeal" models of love are totally wrong, but I do feel their shortcomings often suggest poor & self-destructive relationship strategies. I do think the "fire" model is a decent model for *infatuation*, which is something a lot of popular media blur into love, and which drives many (but not all) of the feelings we normally associate with love (even as those feelings have other possible drivers too). I definitely experienced strong infatuation early on in my engineered relationship (ugh that sounds terrible but I'll stick with it; I promise no deception was involved). I continue to experience mild infatuation years later that waxes and wanes. It's not a stable foundation for a relationship but it can be a useful component of one (this at least popular media depicts often).
I'll continue these thoughts in a reply, by it might take a bit to get to it.
#relationships
@berlinbuzzwords@floss.social2025-05-26 11:00:26
Dive into semantic reranking at Berlin Buzzwords 2025! Athanasios Papaoikonomou will explore how different models and reranking depths impact search performance, revealing important patterns and the real-world efficiency vs. effectiveness trade-off.
Learn more: https://
@leftsidestory@mstdn.social2025-05-25 00:30:02
@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page2025-06-26 09:58:50
Super-resolving frequency measurement with mode-selective quantum memory
Shicheng Zhang, Aonan Zhang, Ilse Maillette de Buy Wenniger, Paul M. Burdekin, Steven Sagona-Stophel, Anindya Rastogi, Sarah E. Thomas, Ian A. Walmsley
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20514
@leftsidestory@mstdn.social2025-05-25 00:30:02
@metacurity@infosec.exchange2025-06-14 12:00:56
Metacurity is pleased to offer our free and premium subscribers a weekly digest of the best long-form (and longish) infosec-related pieces we couldn't properly fit into our daily news crush.
This week's selection covers
--How the SEC missed the likely culprits in its 2017 hack,
--How a quiet engineer controls Telegram,
--When a Canadian teen spied for Russia,
--Cybercrime group document shows that Russia doubts China,
--Modern militaries rely on li…
@leftsidestory@mstdn.social2025-05-13 00:30:02
@leftsidestory@mstdn.social2025-05-13 00:30:02
@leftsidestory@mstdn.social2025-05-22 08:14:23
@leftsidestory@mstdn.social2025-05-22 08:14:23