
2025-06-26 07:46:00
Beyond Autocomplete: Designing CopilotLens Towards Transparent and Explainable AI Coding Agents
Runlong Ye, Zeling Zhang, Boushra Almazroua, Michael Liut
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20062
Beyond Autocomplete: Designing CopilotLens Towards Transparent and Explainable AI Coding Agents
Runlong Ye, Zeling Zhang, Boushra Almazroua, Michael Liut
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20062
AI in Mental Health: Emotional and Sentiment Analysis of Large Language Models' Responses to Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Queries
Arya VarastehNezhad, Reza Tavasoli, Soroush Elyasi, MohammadHossein LotfiNia, Hamed Farbeh
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11285
the sheer amount of prominent old hollywood actresses and models and shit who just got diagnosed with schizophenia without a care as to everything leading up to their mental health collapse
EEG Foundation Challenge: From Cross-Task to Cross-Subject EEG Decoding
Bruno Aristimunha, Dung Truong, Pierre Guetschel, Seyed Yahya Shirazi, Isabelle Guyon, Alexandre R. Franco, Michael P. Milham, Aviv Dotan, Scott Makeig, Alexandre Gramfort, Jean-Remi King, Marie-Constance Corsi, Pedro A. Vald\'es-Sosa, Amit Majumdar, Alan Evans, Terrence J Sejnowski, Oren Shriki, Sylvain Chevallier, Arnaud Delorme
NSD-Imagery: A benchmark dataset for extending fMRI vision decoding methods to mental imagery https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06898
UniMind: Unleashing the Power of LLMs for Unified Multi-Task Brain Decoding
Weiheng Lu, Chunfeng Song, Jiamin Wu, Pengyu Zhu, Yuchen Zhou, Weijian Mai, Qihao Zheng, Wanli Ouyang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18962
Beyond Architectures: Evaluating the Role of Contextual Embeddings in Detecting Bipolar Disorder on Social Media
Khalid Hasan, Jamil Saquer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14231
GenIR: Generative Visual Feedback for Mental Image Retrieval
Diji Yang, Minghao Liu, Chung-Hsiang Lo, Yi Zhang, James Davis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06220
Bhatt Conjectures: On Necessary-But-Not-Sufficient Benchmark Tautology for Human Like Reasoning
Manish Bhatt
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11423 https://
Political alignment correlates with self-reported mental health. I hate this.
I wonder how much of the correlation is actual mental health as opposed to willingness to admit when it’s bad.
(source: https://www.natesilver.net/p/sbsq-21-why-young-men-do…
How attention simplifies mental representations for planning
Jason da Silva Castanheira, Nicholas Shea, Stephen M. Fleming
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09520
On the capabilities of LLMs for classifying and segmenting time series of fruit picking motions into primitive actions
Eleni Konstantinidou, Nikolaos Kounalakis, Nikolaos Efstathopoulos, Dimitrios Papageorgiou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07745
Modeling Open-World Cognition as On-Demand Synthesis of Probabilistic Models
Lionel Wong, Katherine M. Collins, Lance Ying, Cedegao E. Zhang, Adrian Weller, Tobias Gersternberg, Timothy O'Donnell, Alexander K. Lew, Jacob D. Andreas, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Tyler Brooke-Wilson
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12547
Mapping Caregiver Needs to AI Chatbot Design: Strengths and Gaps in Mental Health Support for Alzheimer's and Dementia Caregivers
Jiayue Melissa Shi, Dong Whi Yoo, Keran Wang, Violeta J. Rodriguez, Ravi Karkar, Koustuv Saha
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15047
Data Augmentation for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Leveraging ERNIE Language Models using Artificial Intelligence
Bosubabu Sambana, Kondreddygari Archana, Suram Indhra Sena Reddy, Shaik Meethaigar Jameer Basha, Shaik Karishma
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23503
EmoSLLM: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of LLMs for Speech Emotion Recognition
Hugo Thimonier, Antony Perzo, Renaud Seguier
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14130 https://
Interpreting Radiologist's Intention from Eye Movements in Chest X-ray Diagnosis
Trong-Thang Pham, Anh Nguyen, Zhigang Deng, Carol C. Wu, Hien Van Nguyen, Ngan Le
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12461
The Problem of Atypicality in LLM-Powered Psychiatry
Bosco Garcia, Eugene Y. S. Chua, Harman Singh Brah
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06479 https://arxiv.org/…
Understanding Mental Models of Generative Conversational Search and The Effect of Interface Transparency
Chadha Degachi, Samuel Kernan Freire, Evangelos Niforatos, Gerd Kortuem
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03807
From Stimuli to Minds: Enhancing Psychological Reasoning in LLMs via Bilateral Reinforcement Learning
Yichao Feng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02458 https://…
How popular media gets love wrong
Okay, my attempt at (hopefully widely-applicable) advice about relationships based on my mental "engineering" model and how it differs from the popular "fire" and "appeal" models:
1. If you're looking for a partner, don't focus too much on external qualities, but instead ask: "Do they respect me?" "Are they interested in active consent in all aspects of our relationship?" "Are they willing to commit a little now, and open to respectfully negotiating deeper commitment?" "Are they trustworthy, and willing to trust me?" Finding your partner attractive can come *from* trusting/appreciating/respecting them, rather than vice versa.
2. If you're looking for a partner, don't wait for infatuation to start before you try building a relationship. Don't wait to "fall in love;" if you "fall" into love you could just as easily "fall" out, but if you build up love, it won't be so easy to destroy. If you're feeling lonely and want a relationship, pick someone who seems interesting and receptive in your social circles and ask if they'd like to do something with you (doesn't have to be a date at first). *Pursue active consent* at each stage (if they're not interested; ask someone else, this will be easier if you're not already infatuated). If they're judging you by the standards in point 1, this is doubly important.
3. When building a relationship, try to synchronize your levels of commitment & trust even as you're trying to deepen them, or at least try to be honest and accepting when they need to be out-of-step. Say things and do things that show your partner the things (like trust, commitment, affection, etc.) that are important in your relationship, and ask them to do the same (or ideally you don't have to ask if they're conscious of this too). Do these things not as a chore or a transaction when your partner does them, but because they're the work of building the relationship that you value for its own sake (and because you value your partner for themselves too).
4. When facing big external challenges to your commitment to a relationship, like a move, ensure that your partner has an appropriate level of commitment too, but then don't undervalue the relationship relative to other things in life. Everyone is different, but *to me*, my committed relationship has been far more rewarding than e.g., a more "successful" career would have been. Of course worth noting here that non-men are taught by our society to undervalue their careers & other aspects of their life and sacrifice everything for their partners, which is toxic. I'm not saying "don't value other things" but especially for men, *do* value romantic relationships and be prepared to make decisions that prioritize them over other things, assuming a partner who is comfortable with that commitment and willing to reciprocate.
Okay, this thread is complete for now, until I think of something else that I've missed. I hope this advice is helpful in some way (or at least not harmful). Feel free to chime in if you've got different ideas...
#relationships #love
Leveraging Large Language Models for Spontaneous Speech-Based Suicide Risk Detection
Yifan Gao, Jiao Fu, Long Guo, Hong Liu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00693
Excessive Screen Time is Associated with Mental Health Problems and ADHD in US Children and Adolescents: Physical Activity and Sleep as Parallel Mediators
Ying Dai, Na Ouyang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10062
Psyche-R1: Towards Reliable Psychological LLMs through Unified Empathy, Expertise, and Reasoning
Chongyuan Dai, Jinpeng Hu, Hongchang Shi, Zhuo Li, Xun Yang, Meng Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10848 …
Fine-Tuning Large Language Models Using EEG Microstate Features for Mental Workload Assessment
Bujar Raufi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07283 https://arxiv.o…
Visualizing Cloud-native Applications with KubeDiagrams
Philippe Merle, Fabio Petrillo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22879 https://arxiv…
Human vs. LLM-Based Thematic Analysis for Digital Mental Health Research: Proof-of-Concept Comparative Study
Karisa Parkington, Bazen G. Teferra, Marianne Rouleau-Tang, Argyrios Perivolaris, Alice Rueda, Adam Dubrowski, Bill Kapralos, Reza Samavi, Andrew Greenshaw, Yanbo Zhang, Bo Cao, Yuqi Wu, Sirisha Rambhatla, Sridhar Krishnan, Venkat Bhat
https:/…
A Quantum-Inspired Conceptual Model of Collective Subjective Evaluation via Bloch Sphere Dynamics and Like-Polarization
Bumned Soodchomshom
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.01847
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17663 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_csCL_…
Towards Cognitive Synergy in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems: Integrating Theory of Mind and Critical Evaluation
Adam Kostka, Jaros{\l}aw A. Chudziak
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21969
How popular media gets love wrong
Okay, so what exactly are the details of the "engineered" model of love from my previous post? I'll try to summarize my thoughts and the experiences they're built on.
1. "Love" can be be thought of like a mechanism that's built by two (or more) people. In this case, no single person can build the thing alone, to work it needs contributions from multiple people (I suppose self-love might be an exception to that). In any case, the builders can intentionally choose how they build (and maintain) the mechanism, they can build it differently to suit their particular needs/wants, and they will need to maintain and repair it over time to keep it running. It may need winding, or fuel, or charging plus oil changes and bolt-tightening, etc.
2. Any two (or more) people can choose to start building love between them at any time. No need to "find your soulmate" or "wait for the right person." Now the caveat is that the mechanism is difficult to build and requires lots of cooperation, so there might indeed be "wrong people" to try to build love with. People in general might experience more failures than successes. The key component is slowly-escalating shared commitment to the project, which is negotiated between the partners so that neither one feels like they've been left to do all the work themselves. Since it's a big scary project though, it's very easy to decide it's too hard and give up, and so the builders need to encourage each other and pace themselves. The project can only succeed if there's mutual commitment, and that will certainly require compromise (sometimes even sacrifice, though not always). If the mechanism works well, the benefits (companionship; encouragement; praise; loving sex; hugs; etc.) will be well worth the compromises you make to build it, but this isn't always the case.
3. The mechanism is prone to falling apart if not maintained. In my view, the "fire" and "appeal" models of love don't adequately convey the need for this maintenance and lead to a lot of under-maintained relationships many of which fall apart. You'll need to do things together that make you happy, do things that make your partner happy (in some cases even if they annoy you, but never in a transactional or box-checking way), spend time with shared attention, spend time alone and/or apart, reassure each other through words (or deeds) of mutual beliefs (especially your continued commitment to the relationship), do things that comfort and/or excite each other physically (anywhere from hugs to hand-holding to sex) and probably other things I'm not thinking of. Not *every* relationship needs *all* of these maintenance techniques, but I think most will need most. Note especially that patriarchy teaches men that they don't need to bother with any of this, which harms primarily their romantic partners but secondarily them as their relationships fail due to their own (cultivated-by-patriarchy) incompetence. If a relationship evolves to a point where one person is doing all the maintenance (& improvement) work, it's been bent into a shape that no longer really qualifies as "love" in my book, and that's super unhealthy.
4. The key things to negotiate when trying to build a new love are first, how to work together in the first place, and how to be comfortable around each others' habits (or how to change those habits). Second, what level of commitment you have right now, and what how/when you want to increase that commitment. Additionally, I think it's worth checking in about what you're each putting into and getting out of the relationship, to ensure that it continues to be positive for all participants. To build a successful relationship, you need to be able to incrementally increase the level of commitment to one that you're both comfortable staying at long-term, while ensuring that for both partners, the relationship is both a net benefit and has manageable costs (those two things are not the same). Obviously it's not easy to actually have conversations about these things (congratulations if you can just talk about this stuff) because there's a huge fear of hearing an answer that you don't want to hear. I think the range of discouraging answers which actually spell doom for a relationship is smaller than people think and there's usually a reasonable "shoulder" you can fall into where things aren't on a good trajectory but could be brought back into one, but even so these conversations are scary. Still, I think only having honest conversations about these things when you're angry at each other is not a good plan. You can also try to communicate some of these things via non-conversational means, if that feels safer, and at least being aware that these are the objectives you're pursuing is probably helpful.
I'll post two more replies here about my own experiences that led me to this mental model and trying to distill this into advice, although it will take me a moment to get to those.
#relationships #love
Bayesian Regression Analysis with the Drift-Diffusion Model
Zekai Jin (Mental Health Data Science, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA), Yaakov Stern (Departments of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA), Seonjoo Lee (Mental Health Data Science, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA, Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA)
Understanding Users' Privacy Perceptions Towards LLM's RAG-based Memory
Shuning Zhang, Rongjun Ma, Ying Ma, Shixuan Li, Yiqun Xu, Xin Yi, Hewu Li
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07664
Advancing Mental Disorder Detection: A Comparative Evaluation of Transformer and LSTM Architectures on Social Media
Khalid Hasan, Jamil Saquer, Mukulika Ghosh
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19511
The Role of Generative AI in Facilitating Social Interactions: A Scoping Review
T. T. J. E. Arets, G. Perugia, M. Houben, W. A. IJsselsteijn
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10927
Somatic in the East, Psychological in the West?: Investigating Clinically-Grounded Cross-Cultural Depression Symptom Expression in LLMs
Shintaro Sakai, Jisun An, Migyeong Kang, Haewoon Kwak
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03247
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16456 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_csHC_…
"Is This Really a Human Peer Supporter?": Misalignments Between Peer Supporters and Experts in LLM-Supported Interactions
Kellie Yu Hui Sim, Roy Ka-Wei Lee, Kenny Tsu Wei Choo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09354
The Thin Line Between Comprehension and Persuasion in LLMs
Adrian de Wynter, Tangming Yuan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01936 https://a…
From Reality to Recognition: Evaluating Visualization Analogies for Novice Chart Comprehension
Oliver Huang, Patrick Lee, Carolina Nobre
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03385
ProMemAssist: Exploring Timely Proactive Assistance Through Working Memory Modeling in Multi-Modal Wearable Devices
Kevin Pu, Ting Zhang, Naveen Sendhilnathan, Sebastian Freitag, Raj Sodhi, Tanya Jonker
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21378
Using Tactile Charts to Support Comprehension and Learning of Complex Visualizations for Blind and Low-Vision Individuals
Tingying He, Maggie McCracken, Daniel Hajas, Sarah Creem-Regehr, Alexander Lex
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21462