2025-09-03 10:10:23
Queuing for Civility: Regulating Emotions and Reducing Toxicity in Digital Discourse
Akriti Verma, Shama Islam, Valeh Moghaddam, Adnan Anwar
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00696 htt…
Queuing for Civility: Regulating Emotions and Reducing Toxicity in Digital Discourse
Akriti Verma, Shama Islam, Valeh Moghaddam, Adnan Anwar
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00696 htt…
Can AI agents understand spoken conversations about data visualizations in online meetings?
Rizul Sharma, Tianyu Jiang, Seokki Lee, Jillian Aurisano
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00245
Influence of the majority group on individual judgments in online spontaneous conversations
Diletta Goglia, Davide Vega, Alessio Gandelli
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21092 https:…
"I don't have time for checking stuff, Liam. My friends online show me the truth. There are too many inmigrants"
Mary, a nurse whose frustrations spill over into family life. As tensions rise around the dinner table, the film explores how personal struggles can shape beliefs and conversations.
https://www.youtube…
Incongruent Positivity: When Miscalibrated Positivity Undermines Online Supportive Conversations
Leen Almajed, Abeer ALdayel
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10184 https://
Simulating Online Social Media Conversations on Controversial Topics Using AI Agents Calibrated on Real-World Data
Elisa Composta, Nicolo' Fontana, Francesco Corso, Francesco Pierri
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18985
MetaBreak: Jailbreaking Online LLM Services via Special Token Manipulation
Wentian Zhu, Zhen Xiang, Wei Niu, Le Guan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10271 https://
The Chilling: Identifying Strategic Antisocial Behavior Online and Examining the Impact on Journalists
Yian Wang, Mukhilshankar Umashankar, Eshwar CHandrasekharan, Hari Sundaram
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15061
Identifying Constructive Conflict in Online Discussions through Controversial yet Toxicity Resilient Posts
Ozgur Can Seckin, Bao Tran Truong, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18303
Incremental Summarization for Customer Support via Progressive Note-Taking and Agent Feedback
Yisha Wu (Mia), Cen (Mia), Zhao, Yuanpei Cao, Xiaoqing Su, Yashar Mehdad, Mindy Ji, Claire Na Cheng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06677
Fostering Collective Discourse: A Distributed Role-Based Approach to Online News Commenting
Yoojin Hong, Yersultan Doszhan, Joseph Seering
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02766 https…
Talking Surveys: How Photorealistic Embodied Conversational Agents Shape Response Quality, Engagement, and Satisfaction
Matus Krajcovic, Peter Demcak, Eduard Kuric
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02376
Anyone working in #hospice care in the UK, this might be of interest: pilot courses for teams of 6 to 12 people, on how to use "Clean Language" in conversations about end-of-life care.
1 day in-person, or 2 x half a day if online. CPD certificate.
"Clean Language" is about how you can talk with people and listen to people without accidentally bringing in your own baggage when you didn't mean to.
This skill can help you reach clearer/deeper understanding of other people's worlds. And it can mean you're less likely to set off unnecessary disagreements, so that conversations go more smoothly.
Pilot aimed at South West, Yorkshire & North East. I asked Judy why those areas in particular, and she said those are areas where they're building up "clusters of expertise", but actually it could be any UK end-of-life group.
(I slightly know Judy from having been to a little community event of hers about Clean Language in healthcare. And we have colleagues in common.)
#SouthWestEngland #Yorkshire #NorthEastEngland #healthcare #HospiceCare #death #dying #EndOfLife #communication #CleanLanguage #England #UK