Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@benb@osintua.eu
2025-08-29 20:32:35

Putin prepares a sweeping purge of generals amid fears of another Prigozhin-style revolt: benborges.xyz/2025/08/29/putin

@@arXiv_physicsatomph_bot@mastoxiv.page@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-30 08:39:21

QED calculations of the $2p$-$2s$ transition energies in Li-like ions
V. A. Yerokhin, Z. Harman, C. H. Keitel
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21718 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.21718 arxiv.org/html/2507.21718
arXiv:2507.21718v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Systematic QED calculations of ionization energies of the $2s$, $2p_{1/2}$, and $2p_{3/2}$ states, as well as the $2p_{1/2}$--$2s$ and $2p_{3/2}$--$2p_{1/2}$ transition energies are performed for Li-like ions with the nuclear charge numbers $Z = 10$--$100$. The convergence of QED perturbative expansion is improved by using the extended Furry picture, which starts from the Dirac equation with a local screening potential. An ab initio treatment is accomplished for one- and two-photon electron-structure QED effects and the one-photon screening of the self-energy and vacuum-polarization corrections. This is complemented with an approximate treatment of the two-photon QED screening and higher-order (three or more photon) electron-structure effects. As a result, the obtained theoretical predictions improve upon the accuracy achieved in previous calculations. Comparison with available experimental data shows a good agreement between theory and experiment. In most cases, the theoretical values surpass the experimental results in precision, with only a few exceptions. In the case of uranium and bismuth, the comparison provides one of the most stringent tests of bound-state QED in the strong-field regime. Alternatively, the obtained results can be employed for high-precision determinations of nuclear charge radii.
toXiv_bot_toot

@arXiv_csAR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-05-30 07:15:29

Energy-Efficient QoS-Aware Scheduling for S-NUCA Many-Cores
Sudam M. Wasala, Jurre Wolff, Yixian Shen, Anuj Pathania, Clemens Grelck, Andy D. Pimentel
arxiv.org/abs/2505.23351

@arXiv_physicscompph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-30 08:37:22

Chromo: A High-Performance Python Interface to Hadronic Event Generators for Collider and Cosmic-Ray Simulations
Anatoli Fedynitch, Hans Dembinski, Anton Prosekin
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21856

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-28 09:42:41

PGKET: A Photonic Gaussian Kernel Enhanced Transformer
Ren-Xin Zhao
arxiv.org/abs/2507.19041 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.19041

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-26 09:05:40

Large Language Model-Driven Code Compliance Checking in Building Information Modeling
Soumya Madireddy, Lu Gao, Zia Din, Kinam Kim, Ahmed Senouci, Zhe Han, Yunpeng Zhang
arxiv.org/abs/2506.20551

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-27 09:58:29

Optical response of a binary atomic system with incoherent gain
L. Acevedo, J. S\'anchez-C\'anovas, M. Donaire
arxiv.org/abs/2506.21177

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-23 08:44:52

Buckaroo: A Direct Manipulation Visual Data Wrangler
Annabelle Warner, Andrew McNutt, Paul Rosen, El Kindi Rezig
arxiv.org/abs/2507.16073

@jamesthebard@social.linux.pizza
2025-07-22 16:59:20

After some refactoring, learning about `hatch`, moving more files around, and generally abusing `test.pypi.org`: I've uploaded `diceparse` to PyPI. Still need to update the web documentation, but it now feels like a proper project at this point.
I still need to add a CLI part so you can just roll dice after installing the package, but I'll handle that later. Also need to tweak the README.md a bit as well...

A screenshot of the `diceparse` package in PyPI on version 1.0.6.
@lysander07@sigmoid.social
2025-06-03 07:18:19

ESWC 2025 has just started with the presentation of the submission numbers to the individual tracks:
research track: 98 papers
resource track: 36 papers
in-use track: 22 papers
Looking forward to great presentations and discussions!
#eswc2025 #semweb

The image shows a presentation slide titled "Research Track in Numbers" displayed on a projector screen. The slide details the statistics of a research track, including the number of abstracts and full paper submissions, the acceptance rate, and the reviewing team's performance. It states that there were 125 abstracts and 98 full paper submissions, with 5 desk rejects and 26 accepted papers, representing a 26.5% acceptance rate. The reviewing team consisted of 23 Senior Program Committee (SPC) …
The image shows a presentation slide titled "In-Use Track in Numbers" displayed on a large screen. The slide contains bullet points with statistical information about the track. The first bullet point states that there were 22 abstracts and 22 full submissions, with 0 desk rejects and 8 accepted papers, which is 36.3% of the submissions, indicating a very competitive track. The second bullet point highlights the "Great reviewing team!" with 25 reviewers, 71 reviews in total, and an average of 3…
The image shows a presentation slide titled "Resource Track in Numbers" displayed on a large screen. The slide contains bullet points with numerical data. The first bullet point states "41 abstracts / 36 full submissions," with sub-points indicating "1 desk reject" and "11 accepted papers (30.6%)." The second bullet point is labeled "Reviewing" and includes "131 reviews," "10 SPC," and "52 reviewers." A person is standing at a podium to the left of the screen, wearing a green shirt and a lanyar…