Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@arXiv_csSI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-09 08:38:41

No Such Thing as Free Brain Time: For a Pigouvian Tax on Attention Capture
Hamza Belgroun (Sciences Po, UniCA, CNRS, WIMMICS, Laboratoire I3S - SPARKS), Franck Michel (Laboratoire I3S - SPARKS, WIMMICS), Fabien Gandon (WIMMICS, Laboratoire I3S - SPARKS)
arxiv.org/abs/2509.06453

@mgorny@social.treehouse.systems
2025-10-02 17:42:42

"""
Traditional politics of assistance and the repression of unemployment were now called into question. The need for reform became urgent.
Poverty was gradually separated from the old moral confusions. Economic crises had shown that unemployment could not be confused with indolence, as indigence and enforced idleness spread throughout the countryside, to precisely the places that had previously been considered home to the purest and most immediate forms of moral life. This demonstrated that poverty did not solely fall under the order of the fault: ‘Begging is the fruit of poverty, which in turn is the consequence of accidents in the production of the earth or in the output of factories, of a rise in the price of basic foodstuffs, or of growth of the population, etc.’ Indigence became a matter of economics.
But it was not contingent, nor was it destined to be suppressed forever. There would always be a certain quantity of poverty that could never be effaced, a sort of fatal indigence that would accompany all forms of society until the end of time, even in places where all the idle were employed: ‘The only paupers in a well governed state must be those born in indigence, or those who fall into it by accident.’ This backdrop of poverty was somehow inalienable: whether by birth or accident, it formed an inevitable part of society. The state of lack was so firmly entrenched in the destiny of man and the structure of society that for a long time the idea of a state without paupers remained inconceivable: in the thought of philosophers, property, work and indigence were terms linked right up until the nineteenth century.
This portion of poverty was necessary because it could not be suppressed; but it was equally necessary in that it made wealth possible. Because they worked but consumed little, a class of people in need allowed a nation to become rich, to release the value of its fields, colonies and mines, making products that could be sold throughout the world. An impoverished people, in short, was a people that had no poor. Indigence became an indispensable element in the state. It hid the secret but most real life of society. The poor were the seat and the glory of nations. And their noble misery, for which there was no cure, was to be exalted:
«My intention is solely to invite the authorities to turn part of their vigilant attention to considering the portion of the People who suffer … the assistance that we owe them is linked to the honour and prosperity of the Empire, of which the Poor are the firmest bulwark, for no sovereign can maintain and extend his domain without favouring the population, and cultivating the Land, Commerce and the Arts; and the Poor are the necessary agents for the great powers that reveal the true force of a People.»
What we see here is a moral rehabilitation of the figure of the Pauper, bringing about the fundamental economic and social reintegration of his person. Paupers had no place in a mercantilist economy, as they were neither producers nor consumers, and they were idle, vagabond or unemployed, deserving nothing better than confinement, a measure that extracted and exiled them from society. But with the arrival of the industrial economy and its thirst for manpower, paupers were once again a part of the body of the nation.
"""
(Michel Foucault, History of Madness)

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2025-09-16 23:05:58

Q&A with Amy Lanzi, CEO of marketing and ad agency Digitas, on digital marketing, AI's impact on advertising, the creator economy, and more (Hank Green/The Verge)
theverge.com/decoder-podcast-w

@Mediagazer@mstdn.social
2025-09-17 00:45:47

Q&A with Amy Lanzi, CEO of marketing and ad agency Digitas, on digital marketing, AI's impact on advertising, the creator economy, and more (Hank Green/The Verge)
theverge.com/decoder-podcast-w

@arXiv_physicssocph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-13 09:52:12

Economy and Geography Shape the Collective Attention of Cities
Ke-ke Shang, Jiangli Zhu, Junfan Yi, Liwen Zhang, Junjie Yang, Ge Guo, Zixuan Jin, Michael Small
arxiv.org/abs/2508.08907

@arXiv_csIT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-25 09:16:30

Agentic AI Empowered Multi-UAV Trajectory Optimization in Low-Altitude Economy Networks
Feibo Jiang, Li Dong, Xitao Pan, Kezhi Wang, Cunhua Pan
arxiv.org/abs/2508.16379

@arXiv_econGN_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 07:54:16

The Economics and Game Theory of OSINT Frontline Photography: Risk, Attention, and the Collective Dilemma
Jonathan Teagan
arxiv.org/abs/2509.10548

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-15 10:14:12

Computational Economics in Large Language Models: Exploring Model Behavior and Incentive Design under Resource Constraints
Sandeep Reddy, Kabir Khan, Rohit Patil, Ananya Chakraborty, Faizan A. Khan, Swati Kulkarni, Arjun Verma, Neha Singh
arxiv.org/abs/2508.10426

@lanefu@social.linux.pizza
2025-09-19 17:47:26

blogging feels harder than it used to. Thanks attention economy and probably middle age

@gwire@mastodon.social
2025-08-12 19:30:17

A lot of people making fun of the Environment Agency suggesting "deleting emails" to fight drought.
People also made fun of it when they put it in a press release two months ago. I don't know if it's a deliberate attempt to get attention, or just something their LLM keeps suggesting.

@arXiv_eessSY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-11 07:40:41

Multilayer GNN for Predictive Maintenance and Clustering in Power Grids
Muhammad Kazim, Harun Pirim, Chau Le, Trung Le, Om Prakash Yadav
arxiv.org/abs/2507.07298

@arXiv_csSI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-11 07:55:32

Signals in the Noise: Decoding Unexpected Engagement Patterns on Twitter
Yulin Yu, Houming Chen, Daniel Romero, Paramveer S. Dhillon
arxiv.org/abs/2509.08128