Apple Creator Studio: Bekommen künftig nur Abonnenten alle neuen Features?
Nach der Vorstellung des Kreativsoftware-Abo-Pakets Apple Creator Studio gibt es weiterhin offene Fragen. Werden Abonnenten künftig gegenüber Käufern bevorzugt?
Mit diesem rollenden toten Winkel ist es eigentlich kein Wunder, dass man beim rechts abbiegen Fußgängerinnen umfährt.
Das so was überhaupt auf die Straße darf.
https://www.dnn.de/lokales/dresden/dresden
A profile of Yann LeCun, Meta's chief AI scientist, who says LLMs are a dead end for reaching AGI and backs world models instead, and is reportedly leaving Meta (Meghan Bobrowsky/Wall Street Journal)
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/yann-lecun-ai-
Postbank-Befragung: Große Social-Media-Plattformen verlieren jugendliche Nutzer
Während Social-Media-Verbote für Jugendliche durchgesetzt oder diskutiert werden, wenden sich Heranwachsende offenbar schon etwas von diesen ab.
"We don’t really think about our future – we remember it",
said Dr Hal Hershfield, who studies how humans think about time and how that influences our emotions and behaviors.
When we daydream or envision ourselves at a later point, we essentially create a memory.
We then use these memories to construct our ideas about the future.
This process is called “episodic future thinking”;
it supports our decision-making, emotional regulation and ability to p…
So, wie Audiophile um Rock-Platten aus den späten 1990ern und den 2000ern einen großen Bogen machen (zu Sound-Matsch gemastert wegen Loudness-War), werden Bibliophile irgendwann mal bevorzugt Bücher kaufen, die vor 2023 erschienen sind. Weil man da weitgehend sicher sein kann, dass diese Bücher noch ohne AI-Unterstützung und ganz sicher nicht von einer AI alleine geschrieben wurden. #justthinkin
Ich folge im Fediverse momentan mehr Accounts als ich lesen kann. Und ich könnte noch weit mehr folgen.
Damit ist das Fediverse groß genug um für mich zu funktionieren. Natürlich ist schön, wenn mehr Freunde und Bekannte hier sind, damit ich mitbekomme, was sie so schreiben.¹
Und ich freu mich auch, wenn ich bestimmten Organisationen oder Instoitutionen hier folgen kann – aber nur, wenn sie auch interagieren, andernfalls bevorzuge ich RSS.²
Da ich kontrolliere, was in meine…
Actually, I do want to come back to masculinity under patriarchy and whiteness under white supremacy because I think it's worth talking more about. The "man" under patriarchy (at least "Western" patriarchy) is represented as power and independence. The man needs nothing and thus owes nothing to anyone. The man controls and is not controlled, which is intimately related to independence as dependence can make someone vulnerable to control. The image of "man" projects power and invulnerability. At the same time "man" is a bumbling fool who can't be held accountable for his inability to control his sexual urges. He must be fed and cared for, as though another child. His worst behaviors must be dismissed with phrases such as "boys will be boys" and "locker room talk." The absurdity of the concept of human "independence" is impossible to understate.
Even if you go all Ted Kaczynski, you have still been raised and taught. This is, perhaps, why it is so much more useful to think in terms of obligations than rights. Rights can be claimed and protected with violence alone, but obligations reveal the true interdependence that sustains us. A "man" may assert his rights. Yet, on some level, we all know that the "man" of patriarchy acts as a child who is not mature enough to recognize his obligations.
White violence and white fragility reflect the same dichotomy. "The master race" somehow always needs brown folks to make all their shit and do all the reproductive labor for them. For those who fully embrace whiteness, the "safe space" is a joke. DEI shows weakness. Yet, when presented with an honest history adults become children who are incapable of differentiating between criticism and simple facts. *They* become the ones who must be kept safe. The expectation to be responsible for one's own words and actions, one of the very core definitions of being an adult, is far too much to expect. Their guilt needs room, needs tending, needs caring. White people cannot simply "grow the fuck up" or, as they may say of slavery, "fucking get over it."
And again, interestingly, it is *rights* that they reference: "Mah Freeze PEACH!" I find it hard to distinguish between such and my own child's assertion that anything she doesn't like is "not fair!" No, these assertions fail to recognize the fundamental fabric of adult society: the obligations we hold to each other.
At the intersection of all privilege is the sovereign, the ultimate god-man-baby. Again, referencing the essay (https://hexmhell.writeas.com/observations-on-domination-and-trump)
> This is where it becomes important to consider the ideology behind the sovereign ritual. Participation within the sovereign ritual denotes to the participants elements of the sovereign. That is, all agents of the sovereign are, essentially, micro dictators. By carrying out the will of the sovereign, these micro dictators can, by extension, act outside of the law.
While law enforcement is the ultimate representative of sovereign violence, privileges allow a gradated approximation of the sovereign. Those who are "closer" in privilege to the sovereign may, for example, be permitted to carry out violence against those who are father away. The gradation of privilege turns the whole society, except for the least privileged, into a cult that protects the privilege system on behalf of the most privileged. (And immediately Malcolm X pops to mind as having already talked about part of this relationship in 1963 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf7rsCAfQCo.)
Noch einige der zuletzt hier besonders häufig geteilten #News:
Postbank-Befragung: Große Social-Media-Plattformen verlieren jugendliche Nutzer
KI-Modelle: Musk hält Zusammenarbeit von Apple und Google für problematisch
Der X-Besitzer und Tesla-Chef hat Apple bereits wegen einer angeblichen Bevorzugung anderer KI-Dienste verklagt. Nun äußerte er sich zur Google-Apple-Koop.