Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de
2025-10-18 21:00:05

budapest_connectome: Budapest Reference Connectome 3.0
A parameterizable consensus brain graph, derived from connectomes of 477 people, each computed from MRI datasets of the Human Connectome Project. Nodes are brain regions, and edges are weighted by the number of "tracks" that run between two nodes, as well as fiber length, fractional anisotropy and the number of occurrences in each of the 477 individuals.
This network has 1015 nodes and 93708 edges.
Tags: Biolo…

budapest_connectome: Budapest Reference Connectome 3.0. 1015 nodes, 93708 edges. https://networks.skewed.de/net/budapest_connectome#male_1m
@Techmeme@techhub.social
2025-09-19 06:01:22

How Apple tests Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, 5G, and satellite connectivity on the Apple Watch, including using a Global Navigation Satellite System simulation room (Vanessa Hand Orellana/CNET)
cnet.com/tech/mobile/i-went-in

@arXiv_astrophIM_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-19 08:00:21

Segmentation of the spacecraft transfer problem through overdetermined and continuity constraints based on the Theory of Functional Connections
Allan Kardec de Almeida Junior
arxiv.org/abs/2509.14286

@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2025-12-18 17:03:18

Something that just drives me up the wall about this particular area of Git (merge conflicts) is that, beyond the all-too-typical Git problem of sloppy terminology, this is bad feature design. In most situations, “use ours” and “user theirs” are •both• the wrong answer! There are two doors, and they’re •both• trapdoors.
If you have a merge conflict, that means that you changed something •and• somebody else changed something, and your job is to •synthesize• both changes. To use one is to discard the other, which is usually not what you want!
The thing Git (and every Git GUI) ought to surface is a three-way merge: show me what I changed and what they changed ••relative to the nearest common ancestor••. Yes yes yes, I know it’s possible to finagle that into view with Git. It should be the danged default. It is what I should see first. It is what I should see if I have no idea what I’m doing.
1/ hachyderm.io/@jeremydmiller/11

@UP8@mastodon.social
2025-10-18 14:56:43

🧂 Cocaine trafficking in Colombia moves as much money as the construction industry
english.elpais.com/internation

@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de
2025-11-18 05:00:04

budapest_connectome: Budapest Reference Connectome 3.0
A parameterizable consensus brain graph, derived from connectomes of 477 people, each computed from MRI datasets of the Human Connectome Project. Nodes are brain regions, and edges are weighted by the number of "tracks" that run between two nodes, as well as fiber length, fractional anisotropy and the number of occurrences in each of the 477 individuals.
This network has 1015 nodes and 80270 edges.
Tags: Biolo…

budapest_connectome: Budapest Reference Connectome 3.0. 1015 nodes, 80270 edges. https://networks.skewed.de/net/budapest_connectome#male_200k
@kexpmusicbot@mastodonapp.uk
2025-12-17 18:26:55

🇺🇦 #NowPlaying on KEXP's #MiddayShow
Elastica:
🎵 Connection
#Elastica
mrlckmshp.bandcamp.com/track/w
open.spotify.com/track/53LZqMz

@rasterweb@mastodon.social
2025-12-17 19:14:25

Reminder: You can let Mozilla know what you think about AI and other stupid shit.
connect.mozilla.org/t5/discuss
(Edited to fix li…

@mariyadelano@hachyderm.io
2025-11-17 18:21:14

Seeing the discussion, I’d like to clarify:
This post is not a statement on #nuclear energy. I was responding to the specific article that I shared, where @… reported that tech companies are “using AI to speed up the construction of new nuclear power plants.”
My point is - cutting corners and trying to “speed up” the construction or operation of nuclear power plants can have CATASTROPHIC effects.
Chernobyl was a disaster of mismanagement, cost cutting, and insufficient safety procedures.
I do not trust AI, a technology that is notoriously probabilistic and inconsistent in outputs (and with famously high error rates) to be reliable and competent for a use case where the risks are this high.
I also do not support the mindset of wanting to “speed up” ANY regulatory processes and safety checks when it comes to constructing nuclear power infrastructure.
Licensing is not a “bottleneck” here. It’s a safety prerogative.
(Thanks @… for bringing this to my attention!)

@memeorandum@universeodon.com
2025-12-17 23:01:21

Trump Told by Alan Dershowitz Constitutionality of Third Term Is Unclear (Brian Schwartz/Wall Street Journal)
wsj.com/politics/elections/tru
memeorandum.com/251217/p126#a2