Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.

Zero chance RFK can tell that a map of the Middle East is "perfect",
or even that it is of the Middle East.
So, either it didn't happen, or Trump drew a made up map of the Middle East, and RFK went along with it.
bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.soc

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-28 10:20:01

As salty as I am about it, there's also another way to think about this. For anyone who still has connections to folks on the right (which is perhaps unlikely for anyone on this server, I digress), the cult that has consumed them thrives on isolation and grievance.
The words "you were right" have the potential to cut through the programming and open up an opportunity for reconnection. The modern conspiratorial cult of the Right has been built partially around people who were told they were wrong or were crazy. In the vast majority of cases, they were wrong and even when they were right they completely misunderstood why, but we'll skip that for now. Liberals making fun of them (even the times when they definitely earned it) has pushed them further and further into their ideological hole.
The thing about those words, "you were right," in this context is that the way they offer reconnection also requires them to take one little step of betraying their ideology to accept them. So they must choose between maintaining allegiance to a pedophile or finally getting to feel superior after years of living in an illusion of persecution.
Under the ideology of the Right, admitting one is wrong is a weakness. It is admitting defeat. They have to "own the libs" by saying things, things that they know aren't true, in order to feel dominant. But these things are often so absurd that they end up being made fun of, feeling even more weak and pathetic, reinforcing their fear and alienation.
Offering what they're looking for can offer a way out, but only if they're willing to start to recognize the thing they've supported for what it is.
And they were right about some things. They were right that Bill Gates was a terrible person. I've had plenty of liberals defend him based on his philanthropy washing, but he's awful and always has been. The Epstein links make that blatant. They intuitively recognized him and didn't trust him, even if they were wildly off base about *how and why* he shouldn't be trusted... Even if their correct mistrust was leveraged into one of the most destructive conspiracy theories ever (vaccine denial and COVID vaccine avoidance).
They were right about Bill Clinton. He was always shady as fuck. Sure, the people who attacked him at the time turned out to be even more shady but that's not the point right now. He was connected to Epstein and that was always creepy as fuck.
And the Epstein thing was an open secret that liberals ignored for a long time. It was seen as some weird thing that right wing nutjobs believed about the Clintons. But it was true. Not all of it, and there has always been an antisemitic element to the right wing interpretation or Epstein stuff, but his whole pedophile conspiracy was always kind of real.
The whole "Illuminati"/deep state thing is a vast oversimplification, an attempt to make comprehensible an incredibly complex set of interlocking and emergent behaviors. But Epstein did very much want to remake the world, to create a new world order, and he absolutely played a part in it.
The Right wing nutjobs talked about global authoritarianism, Blackhawks flying over American cities, masked men with guns disarming and executing legal gun owners in the streets. That's all happening right now.
The "FEMA concentration camps" are not actually that far off. ICE and FEMA are sister agencies, both under DHS. I'd be more than happy to call that one "close enough" in order to hear some MAGA admit that ICE is, in fact, building concentration camps.
There was always a huge millennialist element to these things. They tended to be connected to "the antichrist." It was absurd, especially for me as someone who no longer identifies as a Christian. But I'll even acquiess that to a degree. The "the number of the Beast" is 666. That's just the sum of the Hebrew spelling of "Nero." Revelations focuses a lot on Nero coming back to life after his death. His death that involved a head wound, thus the line from Revelation 13:3:
> And I saw one of his heads as if it had been mortally wounded, and his deadly wound was healed. And all the world marveled and followed the beast.
The parallels between Trump and Nero are easy to draw, and Trump's ear wound feels pretty on-the-nose for this. I don't believe in "prophecy" in this way. I think that there are patterns, and useful patterns can become encoded in beleif systems. But I will, again, happily call this one "close enough" for anyone on that side willing to also acknowledge it. I'm happy to meet on that common ground, because anyone who accepts it must recognize that their duty is to fight against it.
A lot of these correct nuggets are embedded in a framework of religious extremism and antisemitism. The vast majority of the beliefs holding these together are wildly wrong and incredibly toxic. But by giving some room to feel validated, listened to, understood, can give some room to admit things that were wrong.
Cult de-programming starts with an opening. People have to talk through their own thoughts, hear their own inconsistencies. Guiding questions can help them untangle these things for themselves. And it all starts by having enough room to feel safe, to not feel cornered, to not feel stupid. Admitting mistakes means being vulnerable, and the MAGA cult is built on fear. It's built on exploiting vulnerability and locking it away.
De-programming takes a long time. It's not easy. It takes patience. But every person who comes out does so with a powerful perspective, a deep understanding, that can be turned back against it. The best people at getting people out of cults are former members. Some of the most dedicated antifa are former fascists who understood their mistakes and dedicate their lives to fixing them.

@andres4ny@social.ridetrans.it
2026-04-29 02:47:56

Is there an Emmy award for being extremely unfunny? If so, then maybe he's right!
bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5o6k7

@vosje62@mastodon.nl
2026-03-28 07:20:53

/2
Publiek geniet van megatransport TenneT: 'Hier kom ik wel even mijn bed voor uit' - RTV Noord
rtvnoord.nl/verkeer/1353652/pu
Die aanvoer zorgde wel voor spectaculaire beelden. Vooral bij de de te lichte brug over de Onstwedderklap.

@paulwermer@sfba.social
2026-03-29 02:24:57

bsky.app/profile/thelibertypea

@PaulWermer@sfba.social
2026-03-29 02:24:57

bsky.app/profile/thelibertypea

@roelgrif@mstdn.social
2026-02-28 12:37:54

Ik blijf me erover verbazen dat een volksvertegenwoordiger in de TK zo overduidelijk met deze drogreden kan komen zonder dat iemand interrumpeert en zegt: hee dit is de verzonken kosten drogreden.
nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verzonke

Ouwehand (PvdD):
Zeker, over stikstof. Ik ga eerst iets aardigs zeggen, dus schrik daar niet van. Het was namelijk een VVD-minister die echt de moed had om … Ik heb het dan over Christianne van der Wal. Ik vond lang niet alle plannen even goed genoeg, maar zij probeerde echt de boeren en de Kamer ervan te overtuigen dat we er nu voor moeten zorgen dat we de natuur beschermen, omdat we anders nooit van dit slot komen. Dat vond ik toen heel hoopgevend. Ik ben nu minder enthousiast over de plannen…
Mevrouw Ouwehand (PvdD):
Ik hoop natuurlijk hetzelfde, maar er zijn wel een paar dingen nodig. De doelen moeten wel aansluiten bij wat er daadwerkelijk nodig is om de natuur te beschermen. Anders eindig je toch weer bij de rechter en volgens mij wil je dat niemand aandoen. Het is ook nodig dat je geen beloftes doet die de boeren het gevoel geven: "Zijn ze daar betoeterd in Den Haag? Ik moet veranderen, maar er gaat wel een vliegveld open". Mijn oprechte verzoek aan de VVD-fractie is dus om de s…
@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2026-02-28 20:35:34

Just finished "The Hate U Give" by Angie Thomas. In an unusual twist of fate, I had read "Concrete Rose" earlier, which gave me a rich backstory to relate things to. "The Hate U Give" is really good, but I found the resolution of King's arc slightly disappointing, even though the ending was strong. It's definitely not my place to judge Thomas' perspective here, but I do think that the book's broad popularity including among more liberal audiences probably stems at least in part from the way it allows a "the cops have issues but are ultimately-necessary/sometimes-positive" reading that undermines the strength of the core message.
In the end I like Concrete Rose better, but they're both great and I'll be putting Thomas' other books on my to-read list.
#AmReading #ReadingNow

@BBC3MusicBot@mastodonapp.uk
2026-04-28 20:45:55

🔊 #NowPlaying on #BBCRadio3:
#TheEssay
- The Death and Life of Christopher Marlowe
Jerry Brotton explores how with Dr Faustus, Kit Marlowe pushed the boundaries of what was permissible for Elizabethan drama and its writers even further.
Relisten now 👇
bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002vb8d

@_tillwe_@mastodon.social
2026-04-28 08:18:06

In den letzten paar Tagen zehn- bis hundertmal so hohe Zugriffszahlen auf mein Blog. Was vor ein paar Jahren eher für Freude sorgen würde, ist hier wohl "bloß" ein KI-Bot, der mal eben alle paartausend Beiträge ausliest. Hm.