Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@arXiv_qbioQM_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 08:18:56

Quantifying topological features and irregularities in zebrafish patterns using the sweeping-plane filtration
Nour Khoudari, John Nardini, Alexandria Volkening
arxiv.org/abs/2509.11023

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-15 10:26:51

SafeMT: Multi-turn Safety for Multimodal Language Models
Han Zhu, Juntao Dai, Jiaming Ji, Haoran Li, Chengkun Cai, Pengcheng Wen, Chi-Min Chan, Boyuan Chen, Yaodong Yang, Sirui Han, Yike Guo
arxiv.org/abs/2510.12133

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-15 09:27:42

Elevating Medical Image Security: A Cryptographic Framework Integrating Hyperchaotic Map and GRU
Weixuan Li, Guang Yu, Quanjun Li, Junhua Zhou, Jiajun Chen, Yihang Dong, Mengqian Wang, Zimeng Li, Changwei Gong, Lin Tang, Xuhang Chen
arxiv.org/abs/2510.12084

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-11 13:26:07

How the US democracy is designed to avoid representation
Right now in the US, a system which proclaims to give each citizen representation, my interests are not represented very well by most of my so-called representatives at any level of government. This is true for a majority of Americans across the political spectrum, and it happens by design. The "founding fathers" were explicit about wanting a system of government that would appear Democratic but which would keep power in the hands of rich white landowners, and they successfully designed exactly that. But how does disenfranchisement work in this system?
First, a two-party system locked in by first-post-the-post winner-takes-all elections immediately destroys representation for everyone who didn't vote for the winner, including those who didn't vote or weren't eligible to vote. Single-day non-holiday elections and prisoner disenfranchisement go a long way towards ensuring working-class people get no say, but much larger is the winner-takes all system. In fact, even people who vote for the winning candidate don't get effective representation if they're really just voting against the opponent as the greater of two evils. In a 51/49 election with 50% turnout, you've immediately ensured that ~75% of eligible voters don't get represented, and with lesser-of-two-evils voting, you create an even wider gap to wedge corporate interests into. Politicians need money to saturate their lesser-of-two-evils message far more than they need to convince any individual voter to support their policies. It's even okay if they get caught lying, cheating, or worse (cough Epstein cough) as long as the other side is also doing those things and you can freeze out new parties.
Second, by design the Senate ensures uneven representation, allowing control of the least-populous half of states to control or at least shut down the legislative process. A rough count suggests 284.6 million live in the 25 most-populous states, while only 54.8 million live in the rest. Currently, counting states with divided representation as two half-states with half as much population, 157.8 million people are represented by 53 Republican sensors, while 180.5 million people get only 45 seats of Democratic representation. This isn't an anti-Democrat bias, it's a bias towards less-populous states, whose residents get more than their share it political power.
I haven't even talked about gerrymandering yet, or family/faith-based "party loyalty," etc. Overall, the effect is that the number of people whose elected representatives meaningfully represent their interests on any given issue is vanishingly small (like, 10% of people tops), unless you happen to be rich enough to purchase lobbying power or direct access.
If we look at polls, we can see how lack of representation lets congress & the president enact many policies that go against what a majority of the population wants. Things like abortion restrictions, the current ICE raids, and Medicare cuts are deeply unpopular, but they benefit the political class and those who can buy access. These are possible because the system ensures at every step of the way that ordinary people do NOT get the one thing the system promises them: representation in the halls of power.
Okay, but is this a feature of all democracies, inherent in the nature of a majority-decides system? Not exactly...
1/2
#uspol #democracy

@arXiv_csIR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 08:32:42

Describe What You See with Multimodal Large Language Models to Enhance Video Recommendations
Marco De Nadai, Andreas Damianou, Mounia Lalmas
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09789

"Please do not use Google AI to find out our specials. Please go on our Facebook page or our website,"
the restaurant wrote in a weary Facebook post.
"Google AI is not accurate and is telling people specials that do not exist
which is causing angry customers yelling at our employees."

@arXiv_condmatstrel_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-14 09:24:18

Integrable Model of a Superconductor with non-Fermi liquid and Mott Phases
Santhosh M, Jorge Dukelsky, Gerardo Ortiz
arxiv.org/abs/2510.10684

@arXiv_statME_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-13 08:05:40

Repulsive Mixture Model with Projection Determinantal Point Process
Ziyi Song, Federico Camerlenghi, Weining Shen, Michele Guindani, Mario Beraha
arxiv.org/abs/2510.08838

@arXiv_statML_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-10 09:53:39

Accelerated Aggregated D-Optimal Designs for Estimating Main Effects in Black-Box Models
Chih-Yu Chang, Ming-Chung Chang
arxiv.org/abs/2510.08465

"CEOs are extremely excited about the opportunities that AI brings," Elijah Clark,
a chief executive who advises other head honchos on using AI at their companies,
told Gizmodo in an interview.
"As a CEO myself, I can tell you, I'm extremely excited about it.
I've laid off employees myself because of AI."
Clark is one of many executives who've been strikingly honest about their intentions to cast aside their flesh and blood worker…