Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@unchartedworlds@scicomm.xyz
2025-05-20 07:01:17

Biden's record on covid
Saw a comment along the lines of: "seems unfair to criticise Biden's record on covid, while the situation now under Trump is so much worse".
But I don't think of them as separate. Biden's government _contributed_ to how covid stands under Trump.
If Biden's lot had taken the opportunity to educate people (at least the ones open to considering science findings) that
- it's airborne like smoke
- an empty room can hold infectious virus
- air filters, UV and fresh air reduce the levels of it
- masks work better the better they fit
- you can be infectious without/before symptoms
- you're fairly likely still to be infectious for 10 days, a few people longer
- current vaccines don't stop you catching it or transmitting it
- it can mess with your immune system so you're more likely to catch other things
- vaccinated people can still get Long Covid
- it's not "mild", it's just that the damage is quiet
then even if they hadn't done anything more to address the problem, people would be in a far better position to deploy their own common sense.
And unlike funding or laws, that investment in _knowledge_ is something it would be difficult for Trump's lot to roll back.
But Biden & co chose instead to play down the risks, and explicitly or implicitly mislead people (e.g. the 5-day quarantine, which contradicts the real infectious period).
So, yes it's worse now, but they _contributed_ to how it is now. They chose to encourage misapprehensions and confusion, and the effects of that choice are still playing out now.
Not letting them off the hook on the grounds of being comparatively "less bad", when they themselves laid some of the foundations of the current state of play.
#covid #Biden #USPol #CovidIsntOver

@arXiv_qbioGN_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-05-20 07:46:15

ChromFound: Towards A Universal Foundation Model for Single-Cell Chromatin Accessibility Data
Yifeng Jiao, Yuchen Liu, Yu Zhang, Xin Guo, Yushuai Wu, Chen Jiang, Jiyang Li, Hongwei Zhang, Limei Han, Xin Gao, Yuan Qi, Yuan Cheng
arxiv.org/abs/2505.12638

@arXiv_qbioGN_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-19 10:08:18

BMFM-RNA: An Open Framework for Building and Evaluating Transcriptomic Foundation Models
Bharath Dandala, Michael M. Danziger, Ella Barkan, Tanwi Biswas, Viatcheslav Gurev, Jianying Hu, Matthew Madgwick, Akira Koseki, Tal Kozlovski, Michal Rosen-Zvi, Yishai Shimoni, Ching-Huei Tsou
arxiv.org/abs/2506.14861

@arXiv_qbiobm_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-11 09:28:25

Aligning Proteins and Language: A Foundation Model for Protein Retrieval
Qifeng Wu, Zhengzhe Liu, Han Zhu, Yizhou Zhao, Daisuke Kihara, Min Xu
arxiv.org/abs/2506.08023

@al3x@hachyderm.io
2025-05-25 20:22:50

When you want to evaluate a new framework do you have sort of a “petclinic” project that you are using as a foundation? If yes, could you share what the project does?