Tootfinder

It's at least the second time that I see maintainers of "#opensource" be actively and strongly upset that people (as in other free/open source devs, not big corps) actually make use of the licensing terms that they gave to their software.
It's just baffling to me. Is it that people don't understand the implications of the licenses they choose? That they never actually believed in the freedoms they gave but just thought it sounded sexy somehow, wanting to have their cake and eat it too?

The Case for Contextual Copyleft: Licensing Open Source Training Data and Generative AI
Grant Shanklin, Emmie Hine, Claudio Novelli, Tyler Schroder, Luciano Floridi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12713

The Case for Contextual Copyleft: Licensing Open Source Training Data and Generative AI
The proliferation of generative AI systems has created new challenges for the Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) community, particularly regarding how traditional copyleft principles should apply when open source code is used to train AI models. This article introduces the Contextual Copyleft AI (CCAI) license, a novel licensing mechanism that extends copyleft requirements from training data to the resulting generative AI models. The CCAI license offers significant advantages, including enhan…