Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@poppastring@dotnet.social
2024-03-18 01:45:01

Just published 🚀: Homo sapiens 1.0
#productmanagment

@leodurruti@puntarella.party
2024-04-21 17:45:14
Content warning: Namib Live, eye contact con Homo Sapiens

#NamibLive un'oretta fa: l'invasione degli Homo Sapiens :angery:

lo screenshot dalla webcam di Namib Live mostra un Homo Sapiens in piedi di fronte alla telecamera spostato sulla destra che sta spiegando cose e altrə Homo Sapiens accanto alla pozza sulla sinistra che si rilassano e bevono una birretta
@arXiv_physicsplasmph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2024-03-26 07:21:34

A numerical study of gravity-driven instability in strongly coupled dusty plasma. Part 3: Homo-interaction between a pair of rising/falling bubbles/droplets
Vikram Dharodi, Evdokiya Kostadinova
arxiv.org/abs/2403.15846

@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de
2024-03-27 11:00:05

genetic_multiplex: Multiplex genetic interactions (2014)
Multiplex networks representing different types of genetic interactions, for different organisms. Layers represent (i) physical, (ii) association, (iii) co-localization, (iv) direct, and (v) suppressive, (vi) additive or synthetic genetic interaction. Edge direction (i,j) indicates gene i interacting with gene j.
This network has 18222 nodes and 170899 edges.
Tags: Biological, Gene regulation, Protein interactions, Un…

genetic_multiplex: Multiplex genetic interactions (2014). 18222 nodes, 170899 edges. https://networks.skewed.de/net/genetic_multiplex#Homo
@gevoel@mastodon.green
2024-04-08 12:50:06

Niet dat ik me daar persoonlijk zorgen over maak, maar toch… homo.promo/@reginasbread/11173

@soc_i_ety@mstdn.ca
2024-03-11 13:53:10

In scientific naming, for the Homo genus, we really need to think again about the Sapien term for the species.
"Wise" does not accurately describe a warmongering, habitat destroying creature. Maybe we are still Homo erectus, or a subspecies Homo Erectus stultus.
:mastodon:

@blakes7bot@botsin.space
2024-04-20 08:47:44

Series C, Episode 03 - Volcano
DAYNA: Would that be wise, even if it could? Would homo sapiens be able to live without conflict? Wouldn't they just die from lack of excitement?
HOWER: We have not found it so. It is our belief that every man is at war with himself. His reason is at war with his instinct, his animal and his spiritual natures clash together and the brain of homo sapiens has developed too much for the animal to bear.
blake.torpidity.net/s/303/265 📺 B7B3

@soc_i_ety@mstdn.ca
2024-03-11 13:53:10

In scientific naming, for the Homo genus, we really need to think again about the Sapien term for the species.
"Wise" does not accurately describe a warmongering, habitat destroying creature. Maybe we are still Homo erectus, or a subspecies Homo Erectus stultus.
:mastodon:

@soc_i_ety@mstdn.ca
2024-04-21 20:09:09

Why think when you can just believe?
- Homo stupidus
:mastodon:

@soc_i_ety@mstdn.ca
2024-04-21 20:09:09

Why think when you can just believe?
- Homo stupidus
:mastodon: