Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@dennisfaucher@infosec.exchange
2025-07-07 17:23:48

Brought one of my kids' 2018 #MacBook Airs back to life by loading the special T2 version of Kubuntu. Works as well as any 1.6GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 #Linux laptop :)

Lid of 2018 MacBook Air wieth a few decals
@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-28 13:06:20

How popular media gets love wrong
Now a bit of background about why I have this "engineered" model of love:
First, I'm a white straight cis man. I've got a few traits that might work against my relationship chances (e.g., neurodivergence; I generally fit pretty well into the "weird geek" stereotype), but as I was recently reminded, it's possible my experience derives more from luck than other factors, and since things are tilted more in my favor than most people on the planet, my advice could be worse than useless if it leads people towards strategies that would only have worked for someone like me. I don't *think* that's the case, but it's worth mentioning explicitly.
When I first started dating my now-wife, we were both in graduate school. I was 26, and had exactly zero dating/romantic experience though that point in my life. In other words, a pretty stereotypical "incel" although I definitely didn't subscribe to incel ideology at all. I felt lonely, and vaguely wanted a romantic relationship (I'm neither aromantic nor asexual), but had never felt socially comfortable enough to pursue one before. I don't drink and dislike most social gatherings like parties or bars; I mostly hung around the fringes of the few college parties I attended, and although I had a reasonable college social life in terms of friends, I didn't really do anything to pursue romance, feeling too awkward to know where to start. I had the beginnings of crushes in both high school and college, but never developed a really strong crush, probably correlated with not putting myself in many social situations outside of close all-male friend gatherings. I never felt remotely comfortable enough to act on any of the proto-crushes I did have. I did watch porn and masturbate, so one motivation for pursuing a relationship was physical intimacy, but loneliness was as much of a motivating factor, and of course the social pressure to date was a factor too, even though I'm quite contrarian.
When I first started dating my now-wife, we were both in graduate school. I was 26, and had exactly zero dating/romantic experience though that point in my life. In other words, a pretty stereotypical "incel" although I definitely didn't subscribe to incel ideology at all. I felt lonely, and vaguely wanted a romantic relationship (I'm neither aromantic nor asexual), but had never felt socially comfortable enough to pursue one before. I don't drink and dislike most social gatherings like parties or bars; I mostly hung around the fringes of the few college parties I attended, and although I had a reasonable college social life in terms of friends, I didn't really do anything to pursue romance, feeling too awkward to know where to start. I had the beginnings of crushes in both high school and college, but never developed a really strong crush, probably correlated with not putting myself in many social situations outside of close all-male friend gatherings. I never felt remotely comfortable enough to act on any of the proto-crushes I did have. I did watch porn and masturbate, so one motivation for pursuing a relationship was physical intimacy, but loneliness was as much of a motivating factor, and of course the social pressure to date was a factor too, even though I'm quite contrarian.
I'm lucky in that I had some mixed-gender social circles already like intramural soccer and a graduate-student housing potluck. Graduate school makes a *lot* more of these social spaces accessible, so I recognize that those not in school of some sort have a harder time of things, especially if like me they don't feel like they fit in in typical adult social spaces like bars.
However, at one point I just decided that my desire for a relationship would need action on my part and so I'd try to build a relationship and see what happened. I worked up my courage and asked one of the people in my potluck if she'd like to go for a hike (pretty much clearly a date but not explicitly one; in retrospect not the best first-date modality in a lot of ways, but it made a little more sense in our setting where we could go for a hike from our front door). To emphasize this point: I was not in love with (or even infatuated with) my now-wife at that point. I made a decision to be open to building a relationship, but didn't follow the typical romance story formula beyond that. Now of course, in real life as opposed to popular media, this isn't anything special. People ask each other out all the time just because they're lonely, and some of those relationships turn out fine (although many do not).
I was lucky in that some aspects of who I am and what I do happened to be naturally comforting to my wife (natural advantage in the "appeal" model of love) but of course there are some aspects of me that annoy my wife, and we negotiate that. In the other direction, there's some things I instantly liked about my wife, and other things that still annoy me. We've figured out how to accept a little, change a little, and overall be happy with each other (though we do still have arguments; it's not like the operation/construction/maintenance of the "love mechanism" is always perfectly smooth). In particular though, I approached the relationship with the attitude of "I want to try to build a relationship with this person," at first just because of my own desires for *any* relationship, and then gradually more and more through my desire to build *this specific* relationship as I enjoyed the rewards of companionship.
So for example, while I think my wife is objectively beautiful, she's also *subjectively* very beautiful *to me* because having decided to build a relationship with her, I actively tried to see her as beautiful, rather than trying to judge whether I wanted a relationship with her based on her beauty. In other words, our relationship is more causative of her beauty-to-me than her beauty-to-me is causative of our relationship. This is the biggest way I think the "engineered" model of love differs from the "fire" and "appeal" models: you can just decide to build love independent of factors we typically think of as engendering love (NOT independent of your partner's willingness to participate, of course), and then all of those things like "thinking your partner is beautiful" can be a result of the relationship you're building. For sure those factors might affect who is willing to try building a relationship with you in the first place, but if more people were willing to jump into relationship building (not necessarily with full commitment from the start) without worrying about those other factors, they might find that those factors can come out of the relationship instead of being prerequisites for it. I think this is the biggest failure of the "appeal" model in particular: yes you *do* need to do things that appeal to your partner, but it's not just "make myself lovable" it's also: is your partner putting in the effort to see the ways that you are beautiful/lovable/etc., or are they just expecting you to become exactly some perfect person they've imagined (and/or been told to desire by society)? The former is perfectly possible, and no less satisfying than the latter.
To cut off my rambling a bit here, I'll just add that in our progress from dating through marriage through staying-married, my wife and I have both talked at times explicitly about commitment, and especially when deciding to get married, I told her that I knew I couldn't live up to the perfect model of a husband that I'd want to be, but that if she wanted to deepen our commitment, I was happy to do that, and so we did. I also rearranged my priorities at that point, deciding that I knew I wanted to prioritize this relationship above things like my career or my research interests, and while I've not always been perfect at that in my little decisions, I've been good at holding to that in my big decisions at least. In the end, *once we had built a somewhat-committed relationship*, we had something that we both recognized was worth more than most other things in life, and that let us commit even more, thus getting even more out of it in the long term. Obviously you can't start the first date with an expectation of life-long commitment, and you need to synchronize your increasing commitment to a relationship so that it doesn't become lopsided, which is hard. But if you take the commitment as an active decision and as the *precursor* to things like infatuation, attraction, etc., you can build up to something that's incredibly strong and rewarding.
I'll follow this up with one more post trying to distill some advice from my ramblings.
#relationships #love

@jredlund@social.linux.pizza
2025-08-01 00:52:30

Rondo/Douglas Beatle Bass
I have had this bass for years. I think I paid $149 for it. It is short scale with a fairly narrow neck. It is very similar to an Epiphone Viola bass, which has a zero fret, but otherwise I can detect no difference. I am mainly a guitar player, so this was a good bass for a guitar player to use to put bass on tracks.

@penguin42@mastodon.org.uk
2025-06-02 17:57:26

It's June, so I've got my Javastation off the shelf for the first time in a couple of decades. This is a Javastation Krups, with 100MHz sparc, sold as a diskless workstation. I never realised it had a PPP ROM boot in! Anyway, I should get on and set up networking and a boot server.
(Note: the plastic on the clips on the doors is fragile, 2 just pinged off on me)
#retrocomputing

A screenshot of the 'JavaOS PPP dialer' - it's got a Motif style widgetry, a Sun purpley theme, a Java logo in the corner and some options and progress bar.
A screenshot, showing a Java logo in the corner, 'JavaStation' in big at the top and an icon that looks like a SIMM, probably indicating ROM boot.
The side of a JavaStation Krups, it's shape is ...odd.  Quite smooth, ovalish in cross section, on the side is a Java logo, and there's another on the top, It's mostly grey with two wings at the back in Purple and some cooling vents inbetween.
The back of a Sun Javastation Krups with it's doors open, showing the audio jacks, Mini DINs for power, mouse and keyboard, LAN and VGA.
@UP8@mastodon.social
2025-07-28 02:21:42

If I hadn't had helpers with umbrellas I would have been stuck in the nearby lean-to reading a book about Kitsune legends of Japan -- here I am reading before the event took place, unfortunately the images of the lean-to I took got corrupted but I'll be back!
#photo #photography

A book open on a wood plank floor with notable grain;  on the left find a bookmark picture of a beautiful woman with yellow eyes and red hair sitting on the edge of the outside floor of a Japanese house in a made outfit with fox ears and tail and a fan that says たまも(tamamo) and has a little doodle of a fox on it;  on the left find a story printed in letterpress with the header "The Story of An Imperial Household Guard Office Disillusioned by an Act of a Fox"
@kexpmusicbot@mastodonapp.uk
2025-06-23 02:10:15

🇺🇦 #NowPlaying on KEXP's #SundaySoul
Gino Soccio:
🎵 I Wanna Take You There
#GinoSoccio
djalicoleman.bandcamp.com/trac
open.spotify.com/track/59K3ZR7

@chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.ca
2025-06-03 16:52:27

OOOHH!!!! 🚨
Just got an email from the BC Government! My FOI request that I submitted almost exactly two years ago in 2023 has finally completed!
Looks like there is ALOT of redacted/partial disclosures
I'm going to keep a lid on what this is all about other than to say, it's about trains and climate change! lol (which is convenient, given my earlier post this morning)
Time for some light reading!
(edit: Holy.... it's 1600 pages!!!)
#FOI #BCPoli #CanPoli #CdnPoli

@floheinstein@chaos.social
2025-05-26 12:37:36

I just read the story about the Italian kidnapped by a New York couple and tortured to disclose the credentials for his crypto assets - and the first thing that came to mind was XKCD 538 "Security" about the five dollar wrench.
Am I a bad person?
#xkcd538 #xkcd

    [Cueball is holding a laptop up in two hands, showing it to his Cueball-like friend who is examining it while holding a hand up to his head. Above the top of the panels frame, there is a box with a caption:]
    A Crypto nerd's imagination:
    Cueball: His laptop's encrypted. Let's build a million-dollar cluster to crack it.
    Friend: No good! It's 4096-bit RSA!
    Cueball: Blast! Our evil plan is foiled!

    [Cueball is holding a closed laptop down in one hand while giving his Cueball…
@mela@zusammenkunft.net
2025-07-22 12:29:46

Let's remove the 'woke' from the people who hate it:
instagram.com/reel/DMK96jduS-J

SixDegrees.org auf Instagram: "“Let’s Get Rid of Woke DEI!” …But What If We Actually Did? What if we got rid of technology that was designed for accessibility for disabled people? Bet you’d be surprised what might disappear. Texting Keyboards Cruise control Touch screens Are you shocked to learn these aren’t just “conveniences”—they were born from accessibility innovations for people with disabilities? Watch the video to see how much of our daily tech traces back to disability inclusion. Spoiler: The world would look very different without it. Want to see how deep the rabbit hole goes? Watch now—you’ll never dismiss DEI the same way again. edit: I misread my script while recording (dyslexia) and said Jack Kirby instead of Kilby. Incidentally, Jack Kirby also benefited from "DEI" initiatives, having collected military disability payments that helped him literally get back on his feet until he got a contract with DC after the war. #FutureOfWork #InclusiveInnovation #TechHistory #DEI #Accessibility #Leadership #DisabilityRights #SixDegrees"
101K likes, 1,041 comments - sixdegreesofkb am July 16, 2025: "“Let’s Get Rid of Woke DEI!” …But What If We Actually Did? What if we got rid of technology that was designed for accessibility for disabled people? Bet you’d be surprised what might disappear. Texting Keyboards Cruise control Touch screens Are you shocked to learn these aren’t just “conveniences”—they were born from accessibility innovations for people with disabilities? Watch the video to see how much of o…

@crell@phpc.social
2025-05-30 21:14:56

It's only censorship if you dislike it, right?

A post from @ToriGlass 

as a kid i remember distinctly being told by adults how awful it was that kids in the soviet union couldn't learn real history, they could only learn state sanctioned propaganda.

these exact same people are now advocating for banning books and history in the US.