Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-24 10:18:29

Continual Generalized Category Discovery: Learning and Forgetting from a Bayesian Perspective
Hao Dai, Jagmohan Chauhan
arxiv.org/abs/2507.17382

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-25 10:22:12

DB-TSDF: Directional Bitmask-based Truncated Signed Distance Fields for Efficient Volumetric Mapping
Jose E. Maese, Luis Merino, Fernando Caballero
arxiv.org/abs/2509.20081

@arXiv_econTH_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-22 08:19:30

Active Product Development
Santiago Oliveros
arxiv.org/abs/2507.15438 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.15438

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-19 10:18:01

Resource-efficient linear-optical generation of GHZ-like states
Suren A. Fldzhyan, Stanislav S. Straupe, Mikhail Yu. Saygin
arxiv.org/abs/2509.14794

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-12 09:27:29

Inteligencia Artificial jur\'idica y el desaf\'io de la veracidad: an\'alisis de alucinaciones, optimizaci\'on de RAG y principios para una integraci\'on responsable
Alex Dantart
arxiv.org/abs/2509.09467

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-11 10:19:41

OST-Bench: Evaluating the Capabilities of MLLMs in Online Spatio-temporal Scene Understanding
JingLi Lin, Chenming Zhu, Runsen Xu, Xiaohan Mao, Xihui Liu, Tai Wang, Jiangmiao Pang
arxiv.org/abs/2507.07984

@yaxu@post.lurk.org
2025-08-27 20:33:01

This was a nice example found by @… of a brickwork tiling that seemed random until someone spotted and shared the pattern - a kind of risset rhythm in brickwork forum.alg…

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 10:16:00

Slice-Wise Initial State Optimization to Improve Cost and Accuracy of the VQE on Lattice Models
Cedric Gaberle, Manpreet Singh Jattana
arxiv.org/abs/2509.13034

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-15 09:52:12

Biasing Frontier-Based Exploration with Saliency Areas
Matteo Luperto, Valerii Stakanov, Giacomo Boracchi, Nicola Basilico, Francesco Amigoni
arxiv.org/abs/2508.10689

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-02 10:08:30

NIRANTAR: Continual Learning with New Languages and Domains on Real-world Speech Data
Tahir Javed, Kaushal Bhogale, Mitesh M. Khapra
arxiv.org/abs/2507.00534

@arXiv_mathDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-09 08:51:12

Dynamical Archetype Analysis: Autonomous Computation
Abel Sagodi, Il Memming Park
arxiv.org/abs/2507.05505 arxiv.org/…

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-28 13:04:34

How popular media gets love wrong
Okay, so what exactly are the details of the "engineered" model of love from my previous post? I'll try to summarize my thoughts and the experiences they're built on.
1. "Love" can be be thought of like a mechanism that's built by two (or more) people. In this case, no single person can build the thing alone, to work it needs contributions from multiple people (I suppose self-love might be an exception to that). In any case, the builders can intentionally choose how they build (and maintain) the mechanism, they can build it differently to suit their particular needs/wants, and they will need to maintain and repair it over time to keep it running. It may need winding, or fuel, or charging plus oil changes and bolt-tightening, etc.
2. Any two (or more) people can choose to start building love between them at any time. No need to "find your soulmate" or "wait for the right person." Now the caveat is that the mechanism is difficult to build and requires lots of cooperation, so there might indeed be "wrong people" to try to build love with. People in general might experience more failures than successes. The key component is slowly-escalating shared commitment to the project, which is negotiated between the partners so that neither one feels like they've been left to do all the work themselves. Since it's a big scary project though, it's very easy to decide it's too hard and give up, and so the builders need to encourage each other and pace themselves. The project can only succeed if there's mutual commitment, and that will certainly require compromise (sometimes even sacrifice, though not always). If the mechanism works well, the benefits (companionship; encouragement; praise; loving sex; hugs; etc.) will be well worth the compromises you make to build it, but this isn't always the case.
3. The mechanism is prone to falling apart if not maintained. In my view, the "fire" and "appeal" models of love don't adequately convey the need for this maintenance and lead to a lot of under-maintained relationships many of which fall apart. You'll need to do things together that make you happy, do things that make your partner happy (in some cases even if they annoy you, but never in a transactional or box-checking way), spend time with shared attention, spend time alone and/or apart, reassure each other through words (or deeds) of mutual beliefs (especially your continued commitment to the relationship), do things that comfort and/or excite each other physically (anywhere from hugs to hand-holding to sex) and probably other things I'm not thinking of. Not *every* relationship needs *all* of these maintenance techniques, but I think most will need most. Note especially that patriarchy teaches men that they don't need to bother with any of this, which harms primarily their romantic partners but secondarily them as their relationships fail due to their own (cultivated-by-patriarchy) incompetence. If a relationship evolves to a point where one person is doing all the maintenance (& improvement) work, it's been bent into a shape that no longer really qualifies as "love" in my book, and that's super unhealthy.
4. The key things to negotiate when trying to build a new love are first, how to work together in the first place, and how to be comfortable around each others' habits (or how to change those habits). Second, what level of commitment you have right now, and what how/when you want to increase that commitment. Additionally, I think it's worth checking in about what you're each putting into and getting out of the relationship, to ensure that it continues to be positive for all participants. To build a successful relationship, you need to be able to incrementally increase the level of commitment to one that you're both comfortable staying at long-term, while ensuring that for both partners, the relationship is both a net benefit and has manageable costs (those two things are not the same). Obviously it's not easy to actually have conversations about these things (congratulations if you can just talk about this stuff) because there's a huge fear of hearing an answer that you don't want to hear. I think the range of discouraging answers which actually spell doom for a relationship is smaller than people think and there's usually a reasonable "shoulder" you can fall into where things aren't on a good trajectory but could be brought back into one, but even so these conversations are scary. Still, I think only having honest conversations about these things when you're angry at each other is not a good plan. You can also try to communicate some of these things via non-conversational means, if that feels safer, and at least being aware that these are the objectives you're pursuing is probably helpful.
I'll post two more replies here about my own experiences that led me to this mental model and trying to distill this into advice, although it will take me a moment to get to those.
#relationships #love

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-01 10:33:53

Bug Fixing with Broader Context: Enhancing LLM-Based Program Repair via Layered Knowledge Injection
Ramtin Ehsani, Esteban Parra, Sonia Haiduc, Preetha Chatterjee
arxiv.org/abs/2506.24015

@arXiv_csDB_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-05 07:42:50

OnPair: Short Strings Compression for Fast Random Access
Francesco Gargiulo, Rossano Venturini
arxiv.org/abs/2508.02280 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.…

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 10:16:11

MPC-based Coarse-to-Fine Motion Planning for Robotic Object Transportation in Cluttered Environments
Chen Cai, Ernesto Dickel Saraiva, Ya-jun Pan, Steven Liu
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11211

@arXiv_mathph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-29 09:41:41

Parallel athermal quasistatic deformation stepping of molecular systems
Maximilian Reihn, Franz Bamer, Benjamin Stamm
arxiv.org/abs/2507.20802

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-01 09:40:32

Unsupervised Incremental Learning Using Confidence-Based Pseudo-Labels
Lucas Rakotoarivony
arxiv.org/abs/2508.21424 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.2142…

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-11 09:33:10

Incremental Language Understanding for Online Motion Planning of Robot Manipulators
Mitchell Abrams, Thies Oelerich, Christian Hartl-Nesic, Andreas Kugi, Matthias Scheutz
arxiv.org/abs/2508.06095

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:31:22

GhostShell: Streaming LLM Function Calls for Concurrent Embodied Programming
Jian Gong, Youwei Huang, Bo Yuan, Ming Zhu, Juncheng Zhan, Jinke Wang, Hang Shu, Mingyue Xiong, Yanjun Ye, Yufan Zu, Yang Zhou, Yihan Ding, Xuannian Chen, Xingyu Lu, Runjie Ban, Bingchao Huang, Fusen Liu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05298

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-01 09:31:02

Estimated Informed Anytime Search for Sampling-Based Planning via Adaptive Sampler
Liding Zhang, Kuanqi Cai, Yu Zhang, Zhenshan Bing, Chaoqun Wang, Fan Wu, Sami Haddadin, Alois Knoll
arxiv.org/abs/2508.21549