Il y a quelque chose de pourri au royaume de la publication scientifique : "Une analyse de 100 000 numéros spéciaux de revues universitaires révèle qu'un numéro sur huit contient des articles rédigés par le rédacteur en chef, en particulier chez l'éditeur MDPI."
Myanmar releases six journalists from prison, all detained following the military's 2021 coup, but continues to hold at least 27 journalists behind bars (Committee to Protect Journalists)
https://cpj.org/2025/12/myanmar-releases-six-journalists-in-pre-el…
"Microplastics found in rural woodland at higher levels than in city centers"
#Microplastics #Plastic #Plastics
What we witnessed was not journalism but the choreography of propaganda.
CBS, in particular, offered thirty uninterrupted minutes of state-sanctioned fantasy,
anchored by a fawning interview with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth,
a man implicated in the killing of more than one hundred people at sea without evidence, accountability, or due process.
Rather than interrogating power, the networks shifted seamlessly into spectacle.
At no point did either network rais…
Been noticing a tinned mango shortage in the UK supermarkets, I assume because of problems with the harvest https://www.fruitnet.com/fresh-produce-journal/peru-mango-collapse-dents-uk-supply/260507.article
JOURNAL> Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies 38 https://networks.h-net.org/group/announcements/20136406/journal-journal-chinese-buddhist-studies-38
The headline should be: ❝AI vendor’s AI-generated analysis claims AI generated reviews for AI-generated papers at AI conference❞
To be clear, I give great credence to the claims of the humans in the article who thought they’d received an AI-generated review. I bet •they’re• correct. It’s Nature I’m coming after here.
A journalistic institution would investigate that claim, track down the reviewer in question, get to the bottom of the story. A PR outlet would just repeat some vendor’s product claims as fact and click “publish.”
Which one is Nature?
/end
JOURNAL> Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies 38
https://ift.tt/vpBeLkd
Mining the Logs: Sources on Blue Humor URL …
via Input 4 RELCFP https://ift.tt/vMXlZkp<…
Note that the headline treats this product’s output as established fact:
❝Major AI conference flooded with peer reviews written fully by AI❞
They didn’t even have the journalistic decency to append “claims AI detection company.” Note the passive voice in the sub-headline:
❝Controversy has erupted after 21% of manuscript reviews for an international AI conference were found to be generated by artificial intelligence.❞
“were found”…by whom? Nobody. It’s just a magic fact.
3/
JOURNAL> Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies 38
https://ift.tt/GDj1J2P
Mining the Logs: Sources on Blue Humor URL …
via Input 4 RELCFP https://ift.tt/pscliGV<…