Just read this post by @… on an optimistic AGI future, and while it had some interesting and worthwhile ideas, it's also in my opinion dangerously misguided, and plays into the current AGI hype in a harmful way.
https://social.coop/@eloquence/114940607434005478
My criticisms include:
- Current LLM technology has many layers, but the biggest most capable models are all tied to corporate datacenters and require inordinate amounts of every and water use to run. Trying to use these tools to bring about a post-scarcity economy will burn up the planet. We urgently need more-capable but also vastly more efficient AI technologies if we want to use AI for a post-scarcity economy, and we are *not* nearly on the verge of this despite what the big companies pushing LLMs want us to think.
- I can see that permacommons.org claims a small level of expenses on AI equates to low climate impact. However, given current deep subsidies on place by the big companies to attract users, that isn't a great assumption. The fact that their FAQ dodges the question about which AI systems they use isn't a great look.
- These systems are not free in the same way that Wikipedia or open-source software is. To run your own model you need a data harvesting & cleaning operation that costs millions of dollars minimum, and then you need millions of dollars worth of storage & compute to train & host the models. Right now, big corporations are trying to compete for market share by heavily subsidizing these things, but it you go along with that, you become dependent on them, and you'll be screwed when they jack up the price to a profitable level later. I'd love to see open dataset initiatives SBD the like, and there are some of these things, but not enough yet, and many of the initiatives focus on one problem while ignoring others (fine for research but not the basis for a society yet).
- Between the environmental impacts, the horrible labor conditions and undercompensation of data workers who filter the big datasets, and the impacts of both AI scrapers and AI commons pollution, the developers of the most popular & effective LLMs have a lot of answer for. This project only really mentions environmental impacts, which makes me think that they're not serious about ethics, which in turn makes me distrustful of the whole enterprise.
- Their language also ends up encouraging AI use broadly while totally ignoring several entire classes of harm, so they're effectively contributing to AI hype, especially with such casual talk of AGI and robotics as if embodied AGI were just around the corner. To be clear about this point: we are several breakthroughs away from AGI under the most optimistic assumptions, and giving the impression that those will happen soon plays directly into the hands of the Sam Altmans of the world who are trying to make money off the impression of impending huge advances in AI capabilities. Adding to the AI hype is irresponsible.
- I've got a more philosophical criticism that I'll post about separately.
I do think that the idea of using AI & other software tools, possibly along with robotics and funded by many local cooperatives, in order to make businesses obsolete before they can do the same to all workers, is a good one. Get your local library to buy a knitting machine alongside their 3D printer.
Lately I've felt too busy criticizing AI to really sit down and think about what I do want the future to look like, even though I'm a big proponent of positive visions for the future as a force multiplier for criticism, and this article is inspiring to me in that regard, even if the specific project doesn't seem like a good one.
We’re heading to #OSFair2025
Together with the European e-Infrastructures Assembly, we’ll be at CERN with a joint booth and a shared mission: to help shape a more open, inclusive, and connected future for research and #openscience
📅 Register by 31 July:
Pseudoscalar meson dominance, the pion-nucleon coupling constant and the Goldberger-Treiman discrepancy
Enrique Ruiz Arriola, Pablo Sanchez-Puertas
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22726
Machine-Learning Prediction of Virus-like Particle Stoichiometry and Stability using Persistent Topological Laplacians
Xiang Liu, Xuefei Huang, Guo-Wei Wei
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21417
DISTIL: Data-Free Inversion of Suspicious Trojan Inputs via Latent Diffusion
Hossein Mirzaei, Zeinab Taghavi, Sepehr Rezaee, Masoud Hadi, Moein Madadi, Mackenzie W. Mathis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22813
Measuring Sample Quality with Copula Discrepancies
Agnideep Aich, Ashit Baran Aich, Bruce Wade
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21434 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.…
Playbook: Mission accomplished? (Politico)
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2025/06/23/mission-accomplished-00417937
http://www.memeorandum.com/250623/p9#a250623p9
Vibe Coding: Is Human Nature the Ghost in the Machine?
Cory Knobel, Nicole Radziwill
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20918 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.20918
A Hybrid Stochastic Gradient Tracking Method for Distributed Online Optimization Over Time-Varying Directed Networks
Xinli Shi, Xingxing Yuan, Longkang Zhu, Guanghui Wen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20645
Statistical Inference for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent
Xintao Xia, Linjun Zhang, Zhanrui Cai
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20560 https://