Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-17 09:34:39

Large Language Models for History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science: Interpretive Uses, Methodological Challenges, and Critical Perspectives
Arno Simons, Michael Zichert, Adrian W\"uthrich
arxiv.org/abs/2506.12242

@arXiv_csLO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-11 07:44:03

Martin Davis: An Overview of his Work in Logic, Computer Science, and Philosophy
Liesbeth De Mol, Yuri V. Matiyasevich, Eugenio G. Omodeo, Alberto Policriti, Wilfried Sieg, Elaine J. Weyuker
arxiv.org/abs/2506.08588

@mgorny@social.treehouse.systems
2025-06-29 19:31:19

"""
Writing has been an instrument for some of the highest expressions of the human spirit: poetry, philosophy, science. But to understand it — why it came into being, how it changed the human experience — we have to first appreciate its crass practicality. It evolved mainly as an instrument of the mundane: the economic, the administrative, the political.
Confusion over this point is understandable. Some scholars have equated the origin of “civilization” with the origin of writing. Laypeople sometimes take this equation to mean that with writing humanity put aside its barbarous past and started behaving in gentlemanly fashion, sipping tea and remembering to say “please.” And indeed, this may be only a mild caricature of what some nineteenth-century scholars actually meant by the equation: writing equals Greece equals Plato; illiteracy equals barbarism equals Attila the Hun.
But, in truth, if you add literacy to Attila the Hun, you don’t get Plato. You get Genghis Khan. During the thirteenth century, he administered what even today is the largest continuous land empire in the history of the world. And he could do so only because he had the requisite means of control: a script that, when carried by his pony express, amounted to the fastest large-scale information-processing technology of his era. One consequence was to give pillaging a scope beyond Attila’s wildest dreams. Information technology, like energy technology or any other technology, can be a tool for good or bad. By itself, it is no guarantor of moral progress or civility.
"""
(Robert Wright, Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny)

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-14 09:59:02

A comprehensive study of LLM-based argument classification: from LLAMA through GPT-4o to Deepseek-R1
Marcin Pietro\'n, Rafa{\l} Olszowski, Jakub Gomu{\l}ka, Filip Gampel, Andrzej Tomski
arxiv.org/abs/2507.08621

@arXiv_csDL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-09 07:32:52

AI-Reporter: A Path to a New Genre of Scientific Communication
Gerd Gra{\ss}hoff
arxiv.org/abs/2507.05903 arxiv.org/p…

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-08 09:58:41

Deepfakes in Criminal Investigations: Interdisciplinary Research Directions for CMC Research
Lorenz Meinen, Astrid Schom\"acker, Stefanie Wiedemann, Markus Hartmann, Timo Speith, Lena K\"astner, Niklas K\"uhl, Christian R\"uckert
arxiv.org/abs/2507.03457