@offenenetze@chaos.social2025-10-30 16:48:27
Prinz William gewinnt Rechtsstreit im Fall um Paparazzifotos
https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/grossbritannien-prinz-william-gewinnt-rechtsstreit-in-fall-um-p…
@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de2025-11-30 20:00:04
cora: CORA citations (1998)
Citations among papers indexed by CORA, from 1998, an early computer science research paper search engine. If a paper i cites a paper j also in this data set, then a directed edge connects i to j. (Papers not in the data set are excluded.) Self-loops may be present. The dates of these snapshots are uncertain.
This network has 23166 nodes and 91500 edges.
Tags: Informational, Citation, Unweighted
@offenenetze@chaos.social2025-10-30 16:48:23
Prinz William gewinnt Rechtsstreit im Fall um Paparazzifotos
https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/grossbritannien-prinz-william-gewinnt-rechtsstreit-in-fall-um-p…
@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page2025-12-31 07:27:56
You can now try @… to ask questions on most recent cs.AI papers.
Examples:
"tell me papers on hallucinations in cs.AI" (you need to specify the category).
https://ma…
@inthehands@hachyderm.io2025-11-29 16:06:15
The headline should be: ❝AI vendor’s AI-generated analysis claims AI generated reviews for AI-generated papers at AI conference❞
To be clear, I give great credence to the claims of the humans in the article who thought they’d received an AI-generated review. I bet •they’re• correct. It’s Nature I’m coming after here.
A journalistic institution would investigate that claim, track down the reviewer in question, get to the bottom of the story. A PR outlet would just repeat some vendor’s product claims as fact and click “publish.”
Which one is Nature?
/end
@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de2025-10-29 22:00:04
cora: CORA citations (1998)
Citations among papers indexed by CORA, from 1998, an early computer science research paper search engine. If a paper i cites a paper j also in this data set, then a directed edge connects i to j. (Papers not in the data set are excluded.) Self-loops may be present. The dates of these snapshots are uncertain.
This network has 23166 nodes and 91500 edges.
Tags: Informational, Citation, Unweighted
@ruth_mottram@fediscience.org2025-11-30 07:48:23
In the field of dynamical glaciology, this would be DeConto and Pollard, 2016.
I think it's dead wrong, but it's certainly led to some very interesting studies.and some real advanced in the otherwise moribund calving dynamics sub-field.
Would love to hear other suggestions from #climate (or adjacent) fields..
#science
@fanf@mendeddrum.org2025-12-30 14:05:08
mmm chorizo and lentil soup is very nice
i make it with lots of different veg, onion celery carrot peppers tomato garlic, so it’s very colourful
this time i added red lentils as well as green lentils to the soup which made it a bit thicker and much more filling
i wonder how quickly it will disappear this time :-)
@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de2025-10-30 14:00:05
cora: CORA citations (1998)
Citations among papers indexed by CORA, from 1998, an early computer science research paper search engine. If a paper i cites a paper j also in this data set, then a directed edge connects i to j. (Papers not in the data set are excluded.) Self-loops may be present. The dates of these snapshots are uncertain.
This network has 23166 nodes and 91500 edges.
Tags: Informational, Citation, Unweighted
@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de2025-11-28 16:00:04
cora: CORA citations (1998)
Citations among papers indexed by CORA, from 1998, an early computer science research paper search engine. If a paper i cites a paper j also in this data set, then a directed edge connects i to j. (Papers not in the data set are excluded.) Self-loops may be present. The dates of these snapshots are uncertain.
This network has 23166 nodes and 91500 edges.
Tags: Informational, Citation, Unweighted
