Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@HeidiSeibold@fosstodon.org
2025-07-18 14:06:06

Does using machine learning solve our problem of p-hacking and HARKing or do we have the same problems as with statistical tests and models?
digiresacademy.kit.com/posts/i

An elf pushing over the letter "P"
@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-18 09:14:41

AI Agents with Human-Like Collaborative Tools: Adaptive Strategies for Enhanced Problem-Solving
Harper Reed, Michael Sugimura, Angelo Zangari
arxiv.org/abs/2509.13547

@arXiv_csLO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 07:39:09

Queen Domination by SAT Solving
Taha Rostami, Curtis Bright
arxiv.org/abs/2508.11945 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.11945

@arXiv_csCC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 08:32:10

NP-Completeness of Multicast Beamforming in Wireless Communication
Sagar Shrestha
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12241 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.12241

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 09:01:50

FlexMind: Scaffolding Flexible Ideation Workflows with AI in Creative Problem-Solving
Yaqing Yang, Vikram Mohanty, Nikolas Martelaro, Aniket Kittur, Yan-Ying Chen, Matthew K. Hong
arxiv.org/abs/2509.12408

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2025-09-17 21:26:05

OpenAI says its reasoning system solved all 12 problems at the 2025 ICPC World Finals, with GPT-5 solving 11 and an experimental model solving the last (Maximilian Schreiner/The Decoder)
the-decoder.com/openai-outperf

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-18 08:42:51

On Solving Asymmetric Diagonally Dominant Linear Systems in Sublinear Time
Tsz Chiu Kwok, Zhewei Wei, Mingji Yang
arxiv.org/abs/2509.13891

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-19 09:05:57

Heterogeneous and anisotropic elastic parameter estimation using a novel semi-analytical forward solver
Xiaopeng Zhu, Zhongyi Huang
arxiv.org/abs/2506.15185

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 11:29:20

Modified security analysis of device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis
Sawan Bhattacharyya, Turbasu Chatterjee, Pankaj Agrawal, Prasenjit Deb
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12938

@arXiv_csSD_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 08:21:20

An Adaptive CMSA for Solving the Longest Filled Common Subsequence Problem with an Application in Audio Querying
Marko Djukanovic, Christian Blum, Aleksandar Kartelj, Ana Nikolikj, Guenther Raidl
arxiv.org/abs/2509.12261

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-18 08:08:00

Beyond Solving Math Quiz: Evaluating the Ability of Large Reasoning Models to Ask for Information
Youcheng Huang, Bowen Qin, Chen Huang, Duanyu Feng, Xi Yang, Wenqiang Lei
arxiv.org/abs/2508.11252

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-17 08:55:30

Designing Algorithms for Entropic Optimal Transport from an Optimisation Perspective
Vishwak Srinivasan, Qijia Jiang
arxiv.org/abs/2507.12246

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 11:43:30

Atom-Searcher: Enhancing Agentic Deep Research via Fine-Grained Atomic Thought Reward
Yong Deng, Guoqing Wang, Zhenzhe Ying, Xiaofeng Wu, Jinzhen Lin, Wenwen Xiong, Yuqin Dai, Shuo Yang, Zhanwei Zhang, Qiwen Wang, Yang Qin, Changhua Meng
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12800

@arXiv_statML_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-19 10:27:22

Double Machine Learning for Conditional Moment Restrictions: IV regression, Proximal Causal Learning and Beyond
Daqian Shao, Ashkan Soleymani, Francesco Quinzan, Marta Kwiatkowska
arxiv.org/abs/2506.14950

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 11:24:10

Simultaneous Contact Sequence and Patch Planning for Dynamic Locomotion
Victor Dh\'edin, Haizhou Zhao, Majid Khadiv
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12928

@arXiv_grqc_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 11:09:56

Solving the Trans-Planckian Censorship Problem with a Power-law Tail in $R^2$ Inflation: A Dynamical System Approach
S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, Eleni I. Manouri, Asterios T. Papadopoulos
arxiv.org/abs/2509.11387

@arXiv_csLO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-18 07:40:51

Algorithmic Perspective on Toda's Theorem
Dror Fried, Etay Segal, Gad E. Yaron
arxiv.org/abs/2509.13871 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.13871

@arXiv_astrophSR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 10:12:40

Energy Conversion and Electron Acceleration and Transport in 3D Simulations of Solar Flares
Xiaocan Li, Chengcai Shen, Xiaoyan Xie, Fan Guo, Bin Chen, Ivan Oparin, Yuqian Wei, Sijie Yu, Jeongbhin Seo
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12990

@arXiv_mathSP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-19 09:13:17

Uniform stability for the matrix inverse Sturm-Liouville problems
Natalia P. Bondarenko
arxiv.org/abs/2506.15300 arxi…

@arXiv_mathAP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-18 08:51:41

MUSIC algorithm for locating point-like scatterers with multiple interactions
Nana Meng
arxiv.org/abs/2509.13738 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.13738…

@arXiv_mathQA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-19 08:15:21

Deformation Quantization on $\mathbb{R}^d$
Haiqi Wu
arxiv.org/abs/2509.14235 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.14235

@arXiv_mathHO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 08:30:20

Collaborative Preferences for Learning Mathematics: A Scale Validation Study
Sang Hyun Kim, Tanya Evans
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12199 arxiv.org/…

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 11:14:20

e-boost: Boosted E-Graph Extraction with Adaptive Heuristics and Exact Solving
Jiaqi Yin, Zhan Song, Chen Chen, Yaohui Cai, Zhiru Zhang, Cunxi Yu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.13020

@arXiv_csPL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 08:15:30

Efficient Compilation of Algorithms into Compact Linear Programs
Shermin Khosravi, David Bremner
arxiv.org/abs/2509.13006 arxiv.org/pdf/250…

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-19 09:04:42

An explicit computational approach for a three-dimensional system of nonlinear elastodynamic sine-Gordon problem
Eric Ngondiep
arxiv.org/abs/2506.14807

@arXiv_nlinSI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 09:04:20

Orthogonal Polynomials for the Gaussian Weight with a Jump and Discrete Painlev\'e Equations
Anton Dzhamay, Elizaveta Trunina
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12202

@arXiv_physicsedph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 08:27:40

Click, Watch, Learn: The Impact of Student Self-Study Materials on Physics E&M Course Outcomes
James K. Hirons, Jonathan D. Perry, Dawson T. Nodurft, Scott Crawford, William Bassichis, Tatiana L. Erukhimova
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12143

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-18 09:48:40

TinyTim: A Family of Language Models for Divergent Generation
Christopher J. Agostino
arxiv.org/abs/2508.11607 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.11607

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-19 10:27:01

Sampled-Based Guided Quantum Walk: Non-variational quantum algorithm for combinatorial optimization
Ugo Nzongani, Dylan Laplace Mermoud, Giuseppe Di Molfetta, Andrea Simonetto
arxiv.org/abs/2509.15138

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-18 08:23:12

VLMgineer: Vision Language Models as Robotic Toolsmiths
George Jiayuan Gao, Tianyu Li, Junyao Shi, Yihan Li, Zizhe Zhang, Nadia Figueroa, Dinesh Jayaraman
arxiv.org/abs/2507.12644

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-18 08:52:40

Human-AI collaboration or obedient and often clueless AI in instruct, serve, repeat dynamics?
Mohammed Saqr, Kamila Misiejuk, Sonsoles L\'opez-Pernas
arxiv.org/abs/2508.10919

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 09:56:41

Solving Distance-Based Optimization Problems Using Optical Hardware
Guangyao Li, Richard Zhipeng Wang, Natalia G. Berloff
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11378

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 07:44:26

LearnLens: An AI-Enhanced Dashboard to Support Teachers in Open-Ended Classrooms
Namrata Srivastava, Shruti Jain, Clayton Cohn, Naveeduddin Mohammed, Umesh Timalsina, Gautam Biswas
arxiv.org/abs/2509.10582

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 11:52:27

SSNCVX: A primal-dual semismooth Newton method for convex composite optimization problem
Zhanwang Deng, Tao Wei, Jirui Ma, Zaiwen Wen
arxiv.org/abs/2509.11995

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-17 08:02:40

A near-complete resolution of the exponential-time complexity of k-opt for the traveling salesman problem
Sophia Heimann, Hung P. Hoang, Stefan Hougardy
arxiv.org/abs/2507.12304

@arXiv_csAR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 07:59:16

SuperUROP: An FPGA-Based Spatial Accelerator for Sparse Matrix Operations
Rishab Parthasarathy
arxiv.org/abs/2509.11529 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.…

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 12:43:07

Foundational theory for optimal decision tree problems. II. Optimal hypersurface decision tree algorithm
Xi He
arxiv.org/abs/2509.12057 arx…

@arXiv_mathDG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-17 08:39:30

The existence and uniqueness of infinite combinatorial Yamabe flows
Bohao Ji
arxiv.org/abs/2507.12355 arxiv.org/pdf/2…

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-04 15:49:00

Should we teach vibe coding? Here's why not.
Should AI coding be taught in undergrad CS education?
1/2
I teach undergraduate computer science labs, including for intro and more-advanced core courses. I don't publish (non-negligible) scholarly work in the area, but I've got years of craft expertise in course design, and I do follow the academic literature to some degree. In other words, In not the world's leading expert, but I have spent a lot of time thinking about course design, and consider myself competent at it, with plenty of direct experience in what knowledge & skills I can expect from students as they move through the curriculum.
I'm also strongly against most uses of what's called "AI" these days (specifically, generative deep neutral networks as supplied by our current cadre of techbro). There are a surprising number of completely orthogonal reasons to oppose the use of these systems, and a very limited number of reasonable exceptions (overcoming accessibility barriers is an example). On the grounds of environmental and digital-commons-pollution costs alone, using specifically the largest/newest models is unethical in most cases.
But as any good teacher should, I constantly question these evaluations, because I worry about the impact on my students should I eschew teaching relevant tech for bad reasons (and even for his reasons). I also want to make my reasoning clear to students, who should absolutely question me on this. That inspired me to ask a simple question: ignoring for one moment the ethical objections (which we shouldn't, of course; they're very stark), at what level in the CS major could I expect to teach a course about programming with AI assistance, and expect students to succeed at a more technically demanding final project than a course at the same level where students were banned from using AI? In other words, at what level would I expect students to actually benefit from AI coding "assistance?"
To be clear, I'm assuming that students aren't using AI in other aspects of coursework: the topic of using AI to "help you study" is a separate one (TL;DR it's gross value is not negative, but it's mostly not worth the harm to your metacognitive abilities, which AI-induced changes to the digital commons are making more important than ever).
So what's my answer to this question?
If I'm being incredibly optimistic, senior year. Slightly less optimistic, second year of a masters program. Realistic? Maybe never.
The interesting bit for you-the-reader is: why is this my answer? (Especially given that students would probably self-report significant gains at lower levels.) To start with, [this paper where experienced developers thought that AI assistance sped up their work on real tasks when in fact it slowed it down] (arxiv.org/abs/2507.09089) is informative. There are a lot of differences in task between experienced devs solving real bugs and students working on a class project, but it's important to understand that we shouldn't have a baseline expectation that AI coding "assistants" will speed things up in the best of circumstances, and we shouldn't trust self-reports of productivity (or the AI hype machine in general).
Now we might imagine that coding assistants will be better at helping with a student project than at helping with fixing bugs in open-source software, since it's a much easier task. For many programming assignments that have a fixed answer, we know that many AI assistants can just spit out a solution based on prompting them with the problem description (there's another elephant in the room here to do with learning outcomes regardless of project success, but we'll ignore this over too, my focus here is on project complexity reach, not learning outcomes). My question is about more open-ended projects, not assignments with an expected answer. Here's a second study (by one of my colleagues) about novices using AI assistance for programming tasks. It showcases how difficult it is to use AI tools well, and some of these stumbling blocks that novices in particular face.
But what about intermediate students? Might there be some level where the AI is helpful because the task is still relatively simple and the students are good enough to handle it? The problem with this is that as task complexity increases, so does the likelihood of the AI generating (or copying) code that uses more complex constructs which a student doesn't understand. Let's say I have second year students writing interactive websites with JavaScript. Without a lot of care that those students don't know how to deploy, the AI is likely to suggest code that depends on several different frameworks, from React to JQuery, without actually setting up or including those frameworks, and of course three students would be way out of their depth trying to do that. This is a general problem: each programming class carefully limits the specific code frameworks and constructs it expects students to know based on the material it covers. There is no feasible way to limit an AI assistant to a fixed set of constructs or frameworks, using current designs. There are alternate designs where this would be possible (like AI search through adaptation from a controlled library of snippets) but those would be entirely different tools.
So what happens on a sizeable class project where the AI has dropped in buggy code, especially if it uses code constructs the students don't understand? Best case, they understand that they don't understand and re-prompt, or ask for help from an instructor or TA quickly who helps them get rid of the stuff they don't understand and re-prompt or manually add stuff they do. Average case: they waste several hours and/or sweep the bugs partly under the rug, resulting in a project with significant defects. Students in their second and even third years of a CS major still have a lot to learn about debugging, and usually have significant gaps in their knowledge of even their most comfortable programming language. I do think regardless of AI we as teachers need to get better at teaching debugging skills, but the knowledge gaps are inevitable because there's just too much to know. In Python, for example, the LLM is going to spit out yields, async functions, try/finally, maybe even something like a while/else, or with recent training data, the walrus operator. I can't expect even a fraction of 3rd year students who have worked with Python since their first year to know about all these things, and based on how students approach projects where they have studied all the relevant constructs but have forgotten some, I'm not optimistic seeing these things will magically become learning opportunities. Student projects are better off working with a limited subset of full programming languages that the students have actually learned, and using AI coding assistants as currently designed makes this impossible. Beyond that, even when the "assistant" just introduces bugs using syntax the students understand, even through their 4th year many students struggle to understand the operation of moderately complex code they've written themselves, let alone written by someone else. Having access to an AI that will confidently offer incorrect explanations for bugs will make this worse.
To be sure a small minority of students will be able to overcome these problems, but that minority is the group that has a good grasp of the fundamentals and has broadened their knowledge through self-study, which earlier AI-reliant classes would make less likely to happen. In any case, I care about the average student, since we already have plenty of stuff about our institutions that makes life easier for a favored few while being worse for the average student (note that our construction of that favored few as the "good" students is a large part of this problem).
To summarize: because AI assistants introduce excess code complexity and difficult-to-debug bugs, they'll slow down rather than speed up project progress for the average student on moderately complex projects. On a fixed deadline, they'll result in worse projects, or necessitate less ambitious project scoping to ensure adequate completion, and I expect this remains broadly true through 4-6 years of study in most programs (don't take this as an endorsement of AI "assistants" for masters students; we've ignored a lot of other problems along the way).
There's a related problem: solving open-ended project assignments well ultimately depends on deeply understanding the problem, and AI "assistants" allow students to put a lot of code in their file without spending much time thinking about the problem or building an understanding of it. This is awful for learning outcomes, but also bad for project success. Getting students to see the value of thinking deeply about a problem is a thorny pedagogical puzzle at the best of times, and allowing the use of AI "assistants" makes the problem much much worse. This is another area I hope to see (or even drive) pedagogical improvement in, for what it's worth.
1/2

@arXiv_eessIV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-15 07:46:01

Automated Tuning for Diffusion Inverse Problem Solvers without Generative Prior Retraining
Ya\c{s}ar Utku Al\c{c}alar, Junno Yun, Mehmet Ak\c{c}akaya
arxiv.org/abs/2509.09880

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 09:49:50

Overcoming Knowledge Discrepancies: Structuring Reasoning Threads through Knowledge Balancing in Interactive Scenarios
Daniel Burkhardt, Xiangwei Cheng
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12100

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-18 08:27:10

Generation and Evaluation in the Human Invention Process through the Lens of Game Design
Katherine M. Collins, Graham Todd, Cedegao E. Zhang, Adrian Weller, Julian Togelius, Junyi Chu, Lionel Wong, Thomas L. Griffiths, Joshua B. Tenenbaum
arxiv.org/abs/2508.10914

@arXiv_physicsbioph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-17 08:18:30

Threshold sensing yields optimal path formation in Physarum polycephalum -- but the mould does not know
Daniele Proverbio, Giulia Giordano
arxiv.org/abs/2507.12347

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-19 09:08:07

On the Effectiveness of Classical Regression Methods for Optimal Switching Problems
Martin Andersson, Benny Avelin, Marcus Olofsson
arxiv.org/abs/2506.15436

@arXiv_csNE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-15 07:59:51

LLM-Based Instance-Driven Heuristic Bias In the Context of a Biased Random Key Genetic Algorithm
Camilo Chac\'on Sartori, Mart\'in Isla Pino, Pedro Pinacho-Davidson, Christian Blum
arxiv.org/abs/2509.09707

@arXiv_hepph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 09:18:51

When CP requires $\bar\theta=0$, not $\bar\theta=\pi$
Luca Vecchi
arxiv.org/abs/2507.10680 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.10680…

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-15 09:22:11

Developer-LLM Conversations: An Empirical Study of Interactions and Generated Code Quality
Suzhen Zhong, Ying Zou, Bram Adams
arxiv.org/abs/2509.10402

@sean@scoat.es
2025-08-04 14:20:57

For many of the days of my career, the most important task I’ve had was to say “no”.
It’s really more like “No, not that way, but let’s find a solution.”
Saying “yes, here’s some code to do the thing you asked, even though you should DEFINITELY not be doing that thing because it’s dangerous for you and your users” is how someone (or some machine) who is not [yet] good at this job acts.

@arXiv_csDM_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-10 07:40:31

The Integrality Gap of the Traveling Salesman Problem is $4/3$ if the LP Solution Has at Most $n 6$ Non-zero Components
Tullio Villa, Eleonora Vercesi, Janos Barta, Monaldo Mastrolilli
arxiv.org/abs/2507.07003

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 10:02:30

Learn to Relax with Large Language Models: Solving Nonlinear Combinatorial Optimization Problems via Bidirectional Coevolution
Beidan Liu, Zhengqiu Zhu, Chen Gao, Yong Zhao, Wei Qi, Quanjun Yin
arxiv.org/abs/2509.12643

@arXiv_mathNT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-08 08:04:50

Solving Skolem problem for negative indexed $k-$generalized Pell numbers
Monalisa Mohapatra, Pritam Kumar Bhoi, Gopal Krishna Panda
arxiv.org/abs/2509.04503

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-18 09:24:32

High Performance Parallel Solvers for the time-harmonic Maxwell Equations
Elise Fressart (CMAP), S\'ebastien Dubois (CMAP), Lo\"ic Gouarin (X, CNRS), Marc Massot (CMAP), Michel Nowak (CMAP), Nicole Spillane (CMAP)
arxiv.org/abs/2507.13066

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 07:33:19

Prompting the Professoriate: A Qualitative Study of Instructor Perspectives on LLMs in Data Science Education
Ana Elisa Lopez-Miranda, Tiffany Timbers, Rohan Alexander
arxiv.org/abs/2509.12283

@v_i_o_l_a@openbiblio.social
2025-07-21 06:27:42

"The Art of Solving Impossible Problems" @ Katina Magazine: katinamagazine.org/content/art
"Sometimes the best way to solve a problem is by ad…

@arXiv_eessAS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 11:33:14

Crosslisted article(s) found for eess.AS. arxiv.org/list/eess.AS/new
[1/1]:
- An Adaptive CMSA for Solving the Longest Filled Common Subsequence Problem with an Application in...
Marko Djukanovic, Christian Blum, Aleksandar Kartelj, Ana Nikolikj, Guenther Raidl

@arXiv_physicsedph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 08:37:13

Teaching Problem Solving in Undergraduate Physics Courses: An Endorsement for Deliberate Practice
Kelly Miller, Olivia Miller, Georgia Lawrence
arxiv.org/abs/2508.08133

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-18 08:21:02

On the factorization of matrices into products of positive definite ones
Mahmoud Abdelgalil, Tryphon T. Georgiou
arxiv.org/abs/2507.12560

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 07:53:51

Solving Linear Programs with Differential Privacy
Alina Ene, Huy Le Nguyen, Ta Duy Nguyen, Adrian Vladu
arxiv.org/abs/2507.10946

@arXiv_csCE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-08 07:40:30

A Concept for Autonomous Problem-Solving in Intralogistics Scenarios
Johannes Sigel, Daniel Dittler, Nasser Jazdi, Michael Weyrich
arxiv.org/abs/2507.03534

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 10:39:20

Scaling Agents via Continual Pre-training
Liangcai Su, Zhen Zhang, Guangyu Li, Zhuo Chen, Chenxi Wang, Maojia Song, Xinyu Wang, Kuan Li, Jialong Wu, Xuanzhong Chen, Zile Qiao, Zhongwang Zhang, Huifeng Yin, Shihao Cai, Runnan Fang, Zhengwei Tao, Wenbiao Yin, Chenxiong Qian, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, Jingren Zhou
arxiv.org/…

@arXiv_nuclth_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-17 08:55:50

Monopole and Seniority Truncations in the Large-Scale Configuration Interaction Shell Model Approach
Priyanka Choudhary, Chong Qi
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11796

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 09:39:11

Solving Integrated Periodic Railway Timetabling with Satisfiability Modulo Theories: A Scalable Approach to Routing and Vehicle Circulation
Florian Fuchs, Bernardo Martin-Iradi, Francesco Corman
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11489

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 10:11:40

Variational data assimilation for the wave equation in heterogeneous media: Numerical investigation of stability
Erik Burman, Janosch Preuss, Tim van Beeck
arxiv.org/abs/2509.13108

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-11 09:45:43

Towards solving industrial integer linear programs with Decoded Quantum Interferometry
Francesc Sabater, Ouns El Harzli, Geert-Jan Besjes, Marvin Erdmann, Johannes Klepsch, Jonas Hiltrop, Jean-Francois Bobier, Yudong Cao, Carlos A. Riofrio
arxiv.org/abs/2509.08328

@arXiv_mathAP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-03 13:02:13

On the complex moment problem as a dynamic inverse problem for a discrete system
A. S. Mikhaylov, V. S. Mikhaylov
arxiv.org/abs/2509.02443

@arXiv_csCC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 08:17:16

A Dichotomy Theorem for Multi-Pass Streaming CSPs
Yumou Fei, Dor Minzer, Shuo Wang
arxiv.org/abs/2509.11399 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.11399

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-13 09:36:52

Solving the Market Split Problem with Lattice Enumeration
Alfred Wassermann
arxiv.org/abs/2508.08702 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.08702

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:25:22

Metacognition and self-regulated learning in manipulative robotic problem-solving task
Margarida Romero (UniCA, UIC, LINE), George Kalmpourtzis
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05112

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 07:42:21

Solving Random Planted CSPs below the $n^{k/2}$ Threshold
Arpon Basu, Jun-Ting Hsieh, Andrew D. Lin, Peter Manohar
arxiv.org/abs/2507.10833

@arXiv_csNE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 09:05:33

Enhancing Decision Space Diversity in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization for the Diet Problem
Gustavo V. Nascimento, Ivan R. Meneghini, Val\'eria Santos, Eduardo Luz, Gladston Moreira
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07077

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 08:55:32

AWorld: Dynamic Multi-Agent System with Stable Maneuvering for Robust GAIA Problem Solving
Zhitian Xie, Qintong Wu, Chengyue Yu, Chenyi Zhuang, Jinjie Gu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09889

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-17 09:40:40

Optimal Spectral Approximation in the Overlaps for Generalized Finite Element Methods
Christian Alber, Peter Bastian, Moritz Hauck, Robert Scheichl
arxiv.org/abs/2507.12226

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-09 11:32:12

OpenCoderRank: AI-Driven Technical Assessments Made Easy
Hridoy Sankar Dutta, Sana Ansari, Swati Kumari, Shounak Ravi Bhalerao
arxiv.org/abs/2509.06774

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-31 09:41:41

Multimodal Late Fusion Model for Problem-Solving Strategy Classification in a Machine Learning Game
Clemens Witt, Thiemo Leonhardt, Nadine Bergner, Mareen Grillenberger
arxiv.org/abs/2507.22426

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 10:33:11

Reasoning Strategies in Large Language Models: Can They Follow, Prefer, and Optimize?
Yanjian Zhang, Guillaume Wisniewski, Nadi Tomeh, Thierry Charnois
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11423

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 09:00:31

Efficient Branch-and-Bound for Submodular Function Maximization under Knapsack Constraint
Yimin Hao, Yi Zhou, Chao Xu, Zhang-Hua Fu
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11107

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 11:05:36

Collisional model with dissipative and dephasing baths: Nonadditive effects at strong coupling
Alessandro Prositto, Carlos Ramon-Escandell, Dvira Segal
arxiv.org/abs/2509.10988

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 11:29:33

Triple-S: A Collaborative Multi-LLM Framework for Solving Long-Horizon Implicative Tasks in Robotics
Zixi Jia, Hongbin Gao, Fashe Li, Jiqiang Liu, Hexiao Li, Qinghua Liu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07421

@arXiv_physicsedph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 08:37:12

Evaluation of a deliberate-practice informed supplemental intervention in graduate Quantum Mechanics
Michael E. Robbins, Guillaume M. Laurent, Eric W. Burkholder
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09917

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-15 11:12:52

Replaced article(s) found for cs.CY. arxiv.org/list/cs.CY/new
[1/1]:
- Prompt Programming: A Platform for Dialogue-based Computational Problem Solving with Generative A...
Victor-Alexandru P\u{a}durean, Paul Denny, Alkis Gotovos, Adish Singla

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-11 09:15:59

Study of Robust Features in Formulating Guidance for Heuristic Algorithms for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problem
Bachtiar Herdianto, Romain Billot, Flavien Lucas, Marc Sevaux
arxiv.org/abs/2508.06129

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-17 08:14:50

Online Block Packing
Ariel Ben Eliezer, Noam Nisan
arxiv.org/abs/2507.12357 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.12357

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-15 09:59:51

RefactorCoderQA: Benchmarking LLMs for Multi-Domain Coding Question Solutions in Cloud and Edge Deployment
Shadikur Rahman, Aroosa Hameed, Gautam Srivastava, Syed Muhammad Danish
arxiv.org/abs/2509.10436

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:11:22

Human-AI Schema Discovery and Application for Creative Problem Solving
Sitong Wang
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05045 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.05045

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 09:52:13

Weighted and unweighted enrichment strategies for solving the Poisson problem with Dirichlet boundary conditions
Francesco Dell'Accio, Luca Desiderio, Allal Guessab, Federico Nudo
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07238

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-08 12:57:41

GPU accelerated variant of Schroeppel-Shamir's algorithm for solving the market split problem
Nils-Christian Kempke, Thorsten Koch
arxiv.org/abs/2507.05045

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-15 09:42:51

A Role-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Financial Education Question Answering with LLMs
Andy Zhu, Yingjun Du
arxiv.org/abs/2509.09727 arxiv…

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 07:33:42

EvoCurr: Self-evolving Curriculum with Behavior Code Generation for Complex Decision-making
Yang Cheng, Zilai Wang, Weiyu Ma, Wenhui Zhu, Yue Deng, Jian Zhao
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09586

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 08:59:12

Mathematical Computation and Reasoning Errors by Large Language Models
Liang Zhang, Edith Aurora Graf
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09932 arxiv.org/pd…

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-01 10:21:31

Cascaded Information Disclosure for Generalized Evaluation of Problem Solving Capabilities
Yunxiang Yan, Tomohiro Sawada, Kartik Goyal
arxiv.org/abs/2507.23776

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-04 09:07:21

An Exploration of Internal States in Collaborative Problem Solving
Sifatul Anindho, Videep Venkatesha, Mariah Bradford, Anne M. Cleary, Nathaniel Blanchard
arxiv.org/abs/2507.02229

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-30 10:12:51

Solving a real-world modular logistic scheduling problem with a quantum-classical metaheuristics
Florian Krellner, Abhishek Awasthi, Nico Kraus, Sarah Braun, Michael Poppel, Daniel Porawski
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21701

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-14 09:00:22

Warm-starting outer approximation for parametrized convex MINLP
Erik Tamm, Gabriele Eichfelder, Jan Kronqvist
arxiv.org/abs/2507.08595

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-15 09:27:41

Near-Optimal Recovery Performance of PhaseLift for Phase Retrieval from Coded Diffraction Patterns
Meng Huang, Jinming Wen, Ran Zhang
arxiv.org/abs/2509.10300

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 09:32:53

Simple Algorithms for Fully Dynamic Edge Connectivity
Yotam Kenneth-Mordoch, Robert Krauthgamer
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07783 arxiv.org/pdf/2508…

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-09 08:11:42

MultiObjectiveAlgorithms.jl: a Julia package for solving multi-objective optimization problems
Oscar Dowson, Xavier Gandibleux, G\"okhan Kof
arxiv.org/abs/2507.05501

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-06 09:32:40

Collab-Solver: Collaborative Solving Policy Learning for Mixed-Integer Linear Programming
Siyuan Li, Yifan Yu, Yanchen Deng, Zhihao Zhang, Mengjing Chen, Fangzhou Zhu, Tao Zhong, Jianye Hao, Peng Liu, Bo An
arxiv.org/abs/2508.03030

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 09:22:13

Learning to control inexact Benders decomposition via reinforcement learning
Zhe Li, Bernard T. Agyeman, Ilias Mitrai, Prodromos Daoutidis
arxiv.org/abs/2508.06700

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-10 10:14:21

CP-Model-Zoo: A Natural Language Query System for Constraint Programming Models
Augustin Crespin, Ioannis Kostis, H\'el\`ene Verhaeghe, Pierre Schaus
arxiv.org/abs/2509.07867

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-01 09:27:02

Freeze and Conquer: Reusable Ansatz for Solving the Traveling Salesman Problem
Fabrizio Fagiolo, Nicolo' Vescera
arxiv.org/abs/2508.21730