from my link log —
A revised Haskell 2010 language report.
https://blog.haskell.org/revised-haskell-2010-report/
saved 2026-08-04 https://
Philippines: Revised Guidelines Threaten Indigenous Rights
New Rules Would Deny Communities’ Free, Prior, and Informed Consent
From Human Rights Watch
https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/08/04/philippines-revised-guidelines-threaten-indigen…
Revisiting the Sauce Gardner trade: Jets sitting pretty as blockbuster blowing up in Colts face
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/revisiting-sauce-gardner-trade-new-…
Are there any licenses that prevent use by genAI companies ? Or generally for-profit companies? 🙏
Edit: maybe this? https://github.com/non-ai-licenses/non-ai-licenses
(I know nothing about licenses, could someone confirm that any of these would work?)
Dear junior code writer,
The word “refactor” is not a synonym for “modify” or “update”.
When you add your email address to the list of addresses to be notified of a change, and say “refactored email list” as your commit message, you look like a jackass.
#ScottSoftwareDevelopment #ScottProgramming
Blir så otroligt trött på myndighetssverige - i nästan varje diskussion (oberoende av verksamhet) säger nån nåt i stil med: Men region x använder det systemet och får svaret men det kan vi inte göra, det är förbjudet. Sen förordas istället ett annat system varpå personen säger, men det är ju förbjudet på uni X och myndighet Y.
Jag förstår att lagar är tolkningsbara, men att vi inte kan enas om vad som är ok är frustrerande i organisationer som måste samarbeta.
What if the fediverse disables reporst and only allow reposts with comments?
The rationale is that I don't care about vitality, if someone is reposting I want to know what it is they are trying to communicate in a more explicit way.
Sources: at the September 24 US-China talks, the US is expected to discuss preventing AI-directed cyberattacks, and China will likely revisit US export controls (Nikkei Asia)
https://asia.nikkei.com/business/techn