#Blakes7 Series B, Episode 10 - Voice from the Past
AVON: [Restrains Blake] Blake.
BLAKE: Renounce!
AVON: Easy, easy!
BLAKE: Renounce!
AVON: [To Cally] Tranquilizer pack!
BLAKE: Renounce! [Cally administers the tranquilizer pack. Blake subsides]
🇺🇦 #NowPlaying on KEXP's #SonicReducer
Ramones:
🎵 Planet Earth 1988
#Ramones
https://open.spotify.com/track/0LNVzRjkhwrXCJi4NU7jTe
What a great write-up of the bananas ideology currently running ( and ruining ) the world
The Psychology Behind Tech Billionaires
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-commentary/billionaires-psychology-tech-pol…
Jakby ktoś miał problem z sieciowkami na najnowszym ubuntu serwer to polecam sprawdzic kernel:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/ source/linux/ bug/2098961
mi dopiero zadzialal downgrade na kernel 6.8.0-47-generic ... i sieciowka virtio dziala, a na e1…
The Cowboys should Cook up something for the running back room https://insidethestar.com/the-cowboys-should-cook-up-something-for-the-running-back-room
Picked up a second hand #running buggy yesterday (Nipper Sport v4). Took little one for our first run together in the afternoon. It was fantastic. So happy to be able to exercise while giving C a break at the same time. Also excited to begin the journey of undoing the ‘Dad bod’. Next step is to see if I can bring our unruly Chocolate Lab along too 😅
Just finished reading Dream State by Eric Puchner, and it kind of pissed me off. I think I can see exactly why it might be popular with a certain WASPy liberal "literati" type that probably includes a lot of influential reviewers, but to me, it's points about love & life, despite being much more complex, ring just about as hollow (and harmful) as a Disney movie.
I've got a lot of quibbles, but I think most galling to me was a throwaway line near the beginning about why platonic relationships get so much less glory in media than romantic ones, when so much of the plot proceeds to revolve around a stale agency-free romantic attraction model that's certainly more complex on its face than a Disney romance but which is ultimately just as misleading.
Go read Loveless or really any YA #OwnVoices romance (especially queer) and you'll be learning more & better lessons about the human condition.
For a local hosted LLM linux server what GPUs work? (running TrueNAS Scale so not sure if nvidia's cards work)
Currently running Ollama Open Web-ui
To dig slightly deeper here, I think that there's a feedback loop between "fall in love/wait for your perfect match (and by the way girls the only career you should aspire to is the literally unattainable 'princess'" Disney stuff and this "my characters are complex I'm so sophisticated; they suffer but it's not intolerable and their lives are good enough despite the imperfections" crap that gets praised as so evocative of the human condition. In fact, I think it merely evokes the condition of its authors & fans who were poisoned by the Disney in their youth and who have remained bad as relationships ever since, though this is not exactly their fault. In any case, their white middle-aged wisdom-shaped-but-quite bitter and intricately-constructed-so-it's-hard-to-see-the-really-untrue-character-facets work ends up keeping their audience within the "romance is luck" cult by way of reassuring them that a middling romance with lots of doubt and complications is "just life" even though the author doesn't actually have any broader perspective on what life is than anyone else.
This has turned into a bit of a rant, but I think I'll just add that reading Mama by Nikkya Hargrove just before Dream State helped immensely to see how the distant & awkward parent-child relationships of the latter are not a product of human nature but instead of white western culture & capitalism.
(The defeatism about climate change is a whole nother dimension of wrong about Dream State, by that's a separate rant.)