Tootfinder

Woohoo #OPAQUE now is an #IETF #RFC 9807!
https://www.rfc-edi…

Standard #Commits 0.1.0 ─ #RFC
https://github.com/standard-commits/standard-commits…

@… so basically, I had the library and test suite already ready, just needed to make some small changes in the library for RFC 9557 compat (and to save ~55KB over the full Temporal polyfill lib)

a bit of a blast from the past!
https://mastodon.online/@rfceditor/114700678397803497

Has anybody seen #RFC9727
(api-catalog: A Well-Known URI and Link Relation to Help Discovery of APIs) implemented anywhere on the internet yet?
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9727.html

«Unicode is good. If you’re designing a data structure or protocol that has text fields, they should contain #Unicode characters encoded in #UTF8. There’s another question, though: “Which Unicode characters?” The answer is “Not all of them, please exclude some.”
This issue keeps coming up, so [

Quantum Computing-resistant cryptographic algorithms now available for .NET developers.
✅ .NET 10 Preview 7 - Module Lattice Digital Signature Algorithm
https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/main/release-note…

core/release-notes/10.0/preview/preview7/libraries.md at main · dotnet/core
.NET news, announcements, release notes, and more! - dotnet/core

#PGP bzw. genauer #OpenPGP gibt es in verschiedenen Standards:
- RFC 2440
- RFC 4880
- RFC 9580 und
- LibrePGP
Johannes Roth und Falko Strenzke haben die Unterschiede zwischen den wichtigsten Standards herausgearbeitet:

@… Temporal seems to use RFC 9557 which is a much stricter date format https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/do

Enhanced Predictive Modeling for Hazardous Near-Earth Object Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Resampling Strategies and Machine Learning Algorithms in Planetary Risk Assessment
Sunkalp Chandra
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15106

Enhanced Predictive Modeling for Hazardous Near-Earth Object Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Resampling Strategies and Machine Learning Algorithms in Planetary Risk Assessment
This study evaluates the performance of several machine learning models for predicting hazardous near-Earth objects (NEOs) through a binary classification framework, including data scaling, power transformation, and cross-validation. Six classifiers were compared, namely Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Logistic Regression (LR), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). RFC and GBC performed the best, b…

The Internet needs more of this, and fewer Nazis. That would truly be a better world.
I appreciate that he hired a real person, rather than AI slop.
https://ericwbailey.website/published/you-must-listen-to-rfc-2119/

You MUST listen to RFC 2119
It turns out you can just pay people to do things.

One more entry in my epic date parsing adventure. I’ve shipped a breaking change to this library to ensure that all valid date strings supported in Eleventy v4 will be RFC 9557-compatible, ensuring friendliness with the standardized Temporal APIs coming to a JavaScript runtime near you. Our full test suite runs against both!
Read (a little) more:

I scored 20/21 on https://e-mail.wtf and all I got was this lousy text to share on social media.
This is an entertaining quiz. But RFC 5322 is not the right place to look for an answer to the question of what a (syntactically) valid email address is.

from my link log —
Intra-procedural lifetime and borrowing analysis in Clang.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-intra-procedural-lifetime-analysis-in-clang/86291
saved 2025-07-15

This week I have (a) enabled DNS security extensions (first documented in 1997 in RFC 2065) on a domain I control and (b) enabled IPv6 (first documented in 1995 in RFC 1883) on my home router, so I think it's time to break out "The Dream of the '90s" from Portlandia: https://youtu.be/TZt-pOc3moc…

@… I did look through those APIs and it looks like they parse RFC 9557 which is less forgiving https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/…

Do I know anyone who knows anyone at cloudflare? Can you tell them to fix their documentation about email smtp/submission ports? It's outdated (see RFC 8314) and still recommends the less secure 587 starttls, and it's the most prominent google result... https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/email-

Working with the new #Idempotency Keys #RFC
https://httptoolkit.com/blog/idempotency-keys/…

🥱
The day SHALL start.
Regards not given,
RFC2119
https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt

"I just want my life back!"
New from Chuck Tingle. This Summer don't stray too far from the standards track, lest you be…
Pounded in the Ass By the RFC Process
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/JPY1_4_KFznrh_sAPUvQc2ig9Cs/

Angular Blog editor Minko Gechev shares what's new on Angular 20. Highlights include newly stabilized APIs, improved debugging tools, polishing the developer experience, and features to enhance generative AI development.
Also, the Angular team has launched an RFC to pick an official mascot for Angular. Isn't that great?
"Announcing Angular v20"

Dodajemy jeszcze jeden system budowania, brachu! Z pewnością nie pożałujesz dodania jeszcze jednego systemu budowania!
Oczywiście, że próbują wepchnąć bajzel… znaczy, #Bazel.
https://github.com/libarchive/libar…

The reading of IETF RFC 2119 going around reminded me that I had recorded myself reading the classic e2e paper and Clark's later design philosophy paper for my students. I certainly am not a trained voice actor, but I seem to recall at least a couple of students appreciating that format.
I'm pretty sure I did this around the mid 2000s when iPods were at their peak popularity, but the Wayback Machine doesn't have a record of them until much later.
If I ever teach agai…

Some modernization planning for Duende IdentityServer. If you are in the #dotnet space, please leave your thoughts. https://github.com/orgs/DuendeSoftware/discussions/285

RFC: Modernizing CancellationToken Usage in Async APIs · DuendeSoftware · Discussion #285
Hey everyone, We're considering a significant change to how IdentityServer handles asynchronous operations, and we need your feedback before moving forward. TL;DR: We want to add CancellationToken ...

Useful.
I’ve always disliked the fact that SOHO NAT routers all seem to be configured with one of a handful of 192.168.*/24 subnets. Beyond the risk of collision, I’ve had the experience of being told vehemently by benighted customer “IT guys” that I’ve done something horribly wrong by setting their inside up on 10.175.202.0/23 or some similarly uncommon RFC1918 block, because they “knew” that it was supposed to be in the Class C range of RFC 1918.

Picking uncontested private IP subnets with usage data

Researching ISO 8601 and RFC 3339 date parsing and found this excellent resource: https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/
Tried a few packages to solve this problem (dayjs, date-fns, luxon, moment). Unfortunately they are either not accurate enough or very large 😭

TIL that chatgpt signs HTTP requests with RFC 9421 signatures, which initially seems over the top, until you consider the scope of what agentic systems might end up doing.
https://fedi.simonwillison.net/@simon/114973107878476323

@… @…
nooo, this is the well known SDTDaaS (Smoke Detector Testing Device as a Service), should probably be covered by some April 1st RFC/ISO

An LLM Agent for Functional Bug Detection in Network Protocols
Mingwei Zheng, Chengpeng Wang, Xuwei Liu, Jinyao Guo, Shiwei Feng, Xiangyu Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00714

An LLM Agent for Functional Bug Detection in Network Protocols
Functional correctness is critical for ensuring the reliability and security of network protocol implementations. Functional bugs, instances where implementations diverge from behaviors specified in RFC documents, can lead to severe consequences, including faulty routing, authentication bypasses, and service disruptions. Detecting these bugs requires deep semantic analysis across specification documents and source code, a task beyond the capabilities of traditional static analysis tools. This p…

Safefetch is close: currently rewriting commit messages closer to required style
Then it'll be off to linux-hardening for initial feedback and testing as an RFC
It's taken about a year to forward port the patchset

gmail says it doesn't like emojis in the "display name" (the real name part of an email address) even though they are RFC-compliant.
Just another example of how a gmail account is not an email account.
Although these are guidelines for bulk senders, I do have newsletters etc that I have subscribed to that have emojis in their name.

gmail says it doesn't like emojis in the "display name" (the real name part of an email address) even though they are RFC-compliant.
Just another example of how a gmail account is not an email account.
Although these are guidelines for bulk senders, I do have newsletters etc that I have subscribed to that have emojis in their name.