Sehr gelacht.
"Axel Springer, Politico execs meet with staff after letter warns CEO risks ‘undermining our reputation’"
https://www.semafor.com/article/04/27/2026/axel-springer-pol…
Supreme Court sharply limits use of race in redistricting in a win for Republicans (Lawrence Hurley/NBC News)
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-limits-use-race-redistricting-win-republicans-rcna245856
http://www.memeorandum.com/260429/p94#a260429p94
Leaked audio: Mathias Döpfner told Politico staff that employees who disagree with Axel Springer's values, or "the essentials", shouldn't work for the publisher (Matthew Kassel/Jewish Insider)
https://jewishinsider.com/2026/04/poli
The Voting Rights Act was a political peace compact written in John Lewis’s blood.
The Callais v Landry decision by the US supreme court,
which set aside much of section 2 of the Voting Rights Act,
whitewashed that blood from history, along with that of thousands of other Americans who fought segregationist white supremacists at lunch counters and bus stations and courthouses for political equality.
“This ruling is a major setback for our nation and threatens to erode…
"Richard Hasen, a law prof. at UCLA, argued that the SCOTUS' 6-3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais "will go down in history as one of the most pernicious and damaging Supreme Court decisions of the last century. The decision will not only increase racial gerrymandering, but also strip millions of voters of "rudimentary fair representation" at all levels of government."
Drastic Supreme Court changes 'unavoidable' after revealing itself as the 'enemy': scholar - Raw Story
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-supreme-court-2676832599/
In this article WaPo moves from the truth
A unanimous win for Dark Money at the Supreme Court
"Pregnancy Crisis Centers"
masquerade as women's clinics that provide abortions.
That is a deception, and doubtless many of their donors were deliberately deceived on that point.
Defrauding donors is something the state has the duty to investigate.
The Supreme Court ruled out of a concern for dogma, not privacy.
On April 1, the Supreme Court hears oral argument in "Trump v. Barbara",
a class-action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for certain people.
No one will be surprised to hear lawyers discussing the text of the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause
and the history that led to its ratification
—that clearly relates to the Trump administration’s claim that birthright citizenship doesn’t apply