Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@azonenberg@ioc.exchange
2025-07-17 16:51:50

ADI / Linear Tech LTC4367 power protection controller, from one of my failed 48V IBC designs that blew up from inductive spikes when I applied power.
I didn't do extensive circuit analysis but it looks like one particular net is blown out in several places. Guessing this is the same pin that cratered on the package.
Besides the damage, some other features of interest:
* Colored fringes on large top metal features. Maybe spin-on glass top metal or something.
* The LT…

2-metal IC die with obvious catastrophic damage in several spots
@arXiv_mathAP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-17 09:45:20

On a fractional semilinear Neumann problem arising in Chemotaxis
Eleonora Cinti, Matteo Talluri
arxiv.org/abs/2507.12181

@arXiv_astrophHE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-15 08:25:42

Ultraviolet radiation and neutrinos: two messengers from CCSNe in the CSM scenario
Silvia Gagliardini, Simone Dall'Osso, Dafne Guetta, Angela Zegarelli, Silvia Celli, Antonio Capone, Irene Di Palma
arxiv.org/abs/2510.11916

@mgorny@social.treehouse.systems
2025-09-05 13:15:19

"""
In melancholy, the spirits are carried away by an agitation, but a weak agitation that lacks power or violence, a sort of impotent upset that follows neither a particular path nor the aperta opercula [open ways], but traverses the cerebral matter constantly creating new pores. Yet the spirits do not wander far on the new paths they create, and their agitation dies down rapidly, as their strength is quickly spent and motion comes to a halt: ‘non longe perveniunt’ [they do not reach far]. A trouble of this nature, common to all delirium, does not have the power to produce on the surface of the body the violent movements or the cries to be observed in mania and frenzy. Melancholy never attains frenzy; it is a madness always at the limits of its own impotence. That paradox is explained by the secret alterations in the spirits. Ordinarily, they travel with the speed and instantaneous transparency of rays of light, but in melancholy they become weighed down with night, becoming ‘obscure, thick and dark’, and the images of things that they bring before consciousness are ‘in a shadow, or covered with darkness’. As a result they move more slowly, and are more like a dark, chemical vapour than pure light. This chemical vapour is acid in nature, rather than sulphurous or alcoholic, for in acid vapours the particles are mobile and incapable of repose, but their activity is weak and without consequence. When they are distilled, all that remains in the still is a kind of insipid phlegm. Acid vapours, therefore, are taken to have the same properties as melancholy, whereas alcoholic vapours, which are always ready to burst into flames, are more related to frenzy, and sulphurous vapours bring on mania, as they are agitated by continuous, violent movement. If the ‘formal reason and causes’ of melancholy were to be sought, it made sense to look for them in the vapours that rose up from the blood to the head, and which had degenerated into ‘an acetous or sharp distillation’. A cursory glance seems to indicate that a melancholy of spirits and a whole chemistry of humours lies behind Willis’ analyses, but in fact his guiding principle mostly reflects the immediate qualities of the melancholic illness: an impotent disorder, and the shadow that comes over the spirit with an acrid acidity that slowly corrodes the heart and the mind. The chemistry of acids is not an explanation of the symptoms, but a qualitative option: a whole phenomenology of melancholic experience.
"""
(Michel Foucault, History of Madness)

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-15 08:31:22

Characterization of non-planar ring oscillators at a wavelength of 1064 nm for high precision metrology
Henning Vahlbruch, Fabian Meylahn, Benno Willke
arxiv.org/abs/2508.10477

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-13 09:29:12

Load-Altering Attacks Against Power Grids: A Case Study Using the GB-36 Bus System Open Dataset
Syed Irtiza Maksud, Subhash Lakshminarayana
arxiv.org/abs/2508.08945

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-22 00:03:45

Overly academic/distanced ethical discussions
Had a weird interaction with @/brainwane@social.coop just now. I misinterpreted one of their posts quoting someone else and I think the combination of that plus an interaction pattern where I'd assume their stance on something and respond critically to that ended up with me getting blocked. I don't have hard feelings exactly, and this post is only partly about this particular person, but I noticed something interesting by the end of the conversation that had been bothering me. They repeatedly criticized me for assuming what their position was, but never actually stated their position. They didn't say: "I'm bothered you assumed my position was X, it's actually Y." They just said "I'm bothered you assumed my position was X, please don't assume my position!" I get that it's annoying to have people respond to a straw man version of your argument, but when I in response asked some direct questions about what their position was, they gave some non-answers and then blocked me. It's entirely possible it's a coincidence, and they just happened to run out of patience on that iteration, but it makes me take their critique of my interactions a bit less seriously. I suspect that they just didn't want to hear what I was saying, while at the same time they wanted to feel as if they were someone who values public critique and open discussion of tricky issues (if anyone reading this post also followed our interaction and has a different opinion of my behavior, I'd be glad to hear it; it's possible In effectively being an asshole here and it would be useful to hear that if so).
In any case, the fact that at the end of the entire discussion, I'm realizing I still don't actually know their position on whether they think the AI use case in question is worthwhile feels odd. They praised the system on several occasions, albeit noting some drawbacks while doing so. They said that the system was possibly changing their anti-AI stance, but then got mad at me for assuming this meant that they thought this use-case was justified. Maybe they just haven't made up their mind yet but didn't want to say that?
Interestingly, in one of their own blog posts that got linked in the discussion, they discuss a different AI system, and despite listing a bunch of concrete harms, conclude that it's okay to use it. That's fine; I don't think *every* use of AI is wrong on balance, but what bothered me was that their post dismissed a number of real ethical issues by saying essentially "I haven't seen calls for a boycott over this issue, so it's not a reason to stop use." That's an extremely socially conformist version of ethics that doesn't sit well with me. The discussion also ended up linking this post: chelseatroy.com/2024/08/28/doe which bothered me in a related way. In it, Troy describes classroom teaching techniques for introducing and helping students explore the ethics of AI, and they seem mostly great. They avoid prescribing any particular correct stance, which is important when teaching given the power relationship, and they help students understand the limitations of their perspectives regarding global impacts, which is great. But the overall conclusion of the post is that "nobody is qualified to really judge global impacts, so we should focus on ways to improve outcomes instead of trying to judge them." This bothers me because we actually do have a responsibility to make decisive ethical judgments despite limitations of our perspectives. If we never commit to any ethical judgment against a technology because we think our perspective is too limited to know the true impacts (which I'll concede it invariably is) then we'll have to accept every technology without objection, limiting ourselves to trying to improve their impacts without opposing them. Given who currently controls most of the resources that go into exploration for new technologies, this stance is too permissive. Perhaps if our objection to a technology was absolute and instantly effective, I'd buy the argument that objecting without a deep global view of the long-term risks is dangerous. As things stand, I think that objecting to the development/use of certain technologies in certain contexts is necessary, and although there's a lot of uncertainly, I expect strongly enough that the overall outcomes of objection will be positive that I think it's a good thing to do.
The deeper point here I guess is that this kind of "things are too complicated, let's have a nuanced discussion where we don't come to any conclusions because we see a lot of unknowns along with definite harms" really bothers me.

@arXiv_hepph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-06 09:43:19

Power corrections to the production of a prompt photon in association with a jet in the $N$-jettiness slicing scheme at NLO QCD
Prem Agarwal, Kirill Melnikov, Ivan Pedron
arxiv.org/abs/2510.03097

@arXiv_statME_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-08 10:01:49

Power-divergence copulas: A new class of Archimedean copulas, with an insurance application
Alan R. Pearse, Howard Bondell
arxiv.org/abs/2510.06177

@arXiv_astrophCO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-10 08:41:19

Control variates from Eulerian and Lagrangian perturbation theory: Application to the bispectrum
Nickolas Kokron, Shi-Fan Chen
arxiv.org/abs/2510.07375

@arXiv_csGT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-11 07:37:42

Efficiently Computing Equilibria in Budget-Aggregation Games
Patrick Becker, Alexander Fries, Matthias Greger, Erel Segal-Halevi
arxiv.org/abs/2509.08767

@arXiv_mathNT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-10 09:12:21

Smoothed Shifted Convolutions of Generalised Divisor Functions
Cheuk Fung Lau
arxiv.org/abs/2509.07556 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.07556

@arXiv_condmatstatmech_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-10 10:04:41

Exact bound of power-efficiency trade-off in finite-time thermodynamic cycles
R. X. Zhai, Xin Yue, C. P. Sun
arxiv.org/abs/2509.07721 arxiv…

@arXiv_astrophGA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-02 10:00:11

The gas streamer G1-2-3 in the Galactic Center
S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, J. Cuadra, R. Genzel, D. Calderon, S. Joharle, T. Piran, D. C. Ribeiro, C. M. P. Russell, M. Sadun Bordoni, A. Burkert, G. Bourdarot, A. Drescher, F. Mang, T. Ott, G. Agapito, A. Agudo Berbel, A. Baruffolo, M. Bonaglia, M. Black, R. Briguglio, Y. Cao, L. Carbonaro, G. Cresci, Y. Dallilar, R. Davies, M. Deysenroth, I. Di Antonio, A. Di Cianno, G. Di Rico, D. Doelman, M. Dolci, S. Esposito, D. Fantinel, D. Ferruz…

@arXiv_mathCO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-04 08:39:21

Generalization and Power of Kocay's Lemma in Graph Reconstruction
Peter Stark
arxiv.org/abs/2509.02604 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.02604

@arXiv_eessSY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-03 13:54:43

On the Effect of Tap Changers and Nonlinear Loads on Voltage Stability
Andrea Zanelli, Dirk Schmidt, Matthias Resch, Marco Giovanelli, Martin Geidl, Walter Sattinger
arxiv.org/abs/2509.02238

@arXiv_mathCT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-25 07:56:50

Tangent structures for divided power algebras
Sacha Ikonicoff
arxiv.org/abs/2508.16302 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.16302

@arXiv_hepth_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-26 10:26:37

Summation of power singularities
A. V. Ivanov
arxiv.org/abs/2508.17289 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.17289

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-01 09:48:42

Normalized Maximum Likelihood Code-Length on Riemannian Manifold Data Spaces
Kota Fukuzawa, Atsushi Suzuki, Kenji Yamanishi
arxiv.org/abs/2508.21466

@arXiv_mathST_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-27 08:39:22

Asymptotic properties of goodness of fit tests based on higher order overlapping spacings
Sherzod M. Mirakhmedov
arxiv.org/abs/2508.18965 a…

@arXiv_eessSP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-03 09:41:01

Wearable and Ultra-Low-Power Fusion of EMG and A-Mode US for Hand-Wrist Kinematic Tracking
Giusy Spacone, Sebastian Frey, Mattia Orlandi, Pierangelo Maria Rapa, Victor Kartsch, Simone Benatti, Luca Benini, Andrea Cossettini
arxiv.org/abs/2510.02000

@arXiv_physicsplasmph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-23 09:48:10

Modeling stopping power of ions in plasmas using parametric potentials
Tanguy Barges Delattre, S\'ebastien Rassou, Jean-Christophe Pain
arxiv.org/abs/2509.17453

@arXiv_grqc_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-23 09:39:12

Multi-field TDiff theories: the mixed regime case
Antonio L. Maroto, Prado Mart\'in-Moruno, Diego Tessainer
arxiv.org/abs/2507.16616

@arXiv_statAP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-01 08:20:21

The effect of a new power interconnector on energy prices volatility: the case of Sicily
Francesco Lisi, Pierdomenico Duttilo, Marina Bertolini
arxiv.org/abs/2507.23505

@arXiv_mathPR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-22 09:28:41

Covariance matrices of volume power functionals of random simplicial complexes -- an asymptotic analysis
Mandala von Westenholz
arxiv.org/abs/2509.15790

@arXiv_astrophCO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-21 08:42:00

Resurrecting Vanilla Power Law Inflation with the aid of Continuous Spontaneous Localization in the ACT era
Suratna Das
arxiv.org/abs/2508.14602

@arXiv_mathCO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-29 10:07:02

Marked multi-colorings and marked chromatic polynomials of hypergraphs and subspace arrangements
Chaithra P, Shushma Rani, R. Venkatesh
arxiv.org/abs/2507.20847

@arXiv_nuclth_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-25 09:00:20

Accurate spontaneous fission half-lives from a microscopic large-scale nuclear structure model
Adri\'an S\'anchez-Fern\'andez, Silvia Bara, Wouter Ryssens, St\'ephane Goriely
arxiv.org/abs/2508.16240

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-19 07:50:01

Kronecker Powers, Orthogonal Vectors, and the Asymptotic Spectrum
Josh Alman, Baitian Li
arxiv.org/abs/2509.14489 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.14489

@arXiv_mathNT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-27 09:27:22

Greenberg's conjecture and Inverse Galois problem: metacyclic-nonmodular group of type 1 whose abelianization is $\mathbb{Z}/2 \mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}/2^m \mathbb{Z}$, $m\geq 2$
Mohamed Mahmoud Chems-Eddin, Hamza El Mamry
arxiv.org/abs/2508.18402

@arXiv_astrophHE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-01 08:42:21

Mass Determination of Supermassive Black Holes Governing Evolution of Radio Emitters
Kimitake Hayasaki, Ryo Yamazaki
arxiv.org/abs/2507.23161

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-01 09:49:07

Optical Vortex Dynamics in non-uniform twisted Ring-Core Fibers
Hassan Asgharzadeh B., Regina Gumenyuk, Marco Ornigotti
arxiv.org/abs/2509.26078

@arXiv_eessSP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-29 08:57:41

Weighted Bayesian Cram$\acute{\text{e}}$r-Rao Bound for Mixed-Resolution Parameter Estimation
Yaniv Mazor, Tirza Routtenberg
arxiv.org/abs/2508.20761

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-29 11:34:37

Physics-informed GNN for medium-high voltage AC power flow with edge-aware attention and line search correction operator
Changhun Kim, Timon Conrad, Redwanul Karim, Julian Oelhaf, David Riebesel, Tom\'as Arias-Vergara, Andreas Maier, Johann J\"ager, Siming Bayer
arxiv.org/abs/2509.22458

@arXiv_csAR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-20 09:01:30

Sustainable AI Training via Hardware-Software Co-Design on NVIDIA, AMD, and Emerging GPU Architectures
Yashasvi Makin, Rahul Maliakkal
arxiv.org/abs/2508.13163

@arXiv_eessSY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-21 09:29:10

Grid-Edge Energy-Flexible Technologies: A Comparative Analysis Across Generators, Loads, and Energy Storage Systems
Jesus Silva-Rodriguez, Tianxia Zhao, Ran Mo, Xingpeng Li
arxiv.org/abs/2508.14297

@arXiv_mathAP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-22 08:57:41

Multiple nodal solutions to a scalar field equation with double-power nonlinearity and zero mass at infinity
M\'onica Clapp, Carlos Culebro
arxiv.org/abs/2508.15167