Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@mgorny@social.treehouse.systems
2025-09-05 10:41:07

"""
In the sixteenth century, lunacy was a constant theme that was never questioned. It was still frequent in the seventeenth century, but started to disappear, and by 1707, the year in which Le François asked the question ‘Estne aliquod lunae in corpora humana imperium?’ (Does the moon have any influence over the human body?), after lengthy discussions, the university decided that their reply was in the negative. In the course of the eighteenth century the moon was rarely cited among the causes of madness, even as a possible factor or an aggravation. But right at the end of the century the idea reappears, perhaps under the influence of English medicine, which had never entirely forgotten the moon, and Daquin, followed by Leuret and Guislain, all admitted the influence of the moon on the phases of maniacal excitement, or at the least on the agitation of their patients. But what is important here is not so much the return of the theme as the possibility and conditions necessary for its reappearance. It reappears entirely transformed, filled with a new significance that it did not formerly possess. In its traditional form, it designated an immediate influence, a direct coincidence in time and intersection in space, whose mode of action was entirely situated in the power of the stars. But in Daquin by contrast, the influence of the moon acts through a whole series of mediations, in a kind of hierarchy, surrounding man. The moon acts on the atmosphere with such intensity that it can set in motion a mass as heavy as the ocean. The nervous system, of all the parts that make up the human organism, is the part most sensitive to atmospheric variations, as the slightest variation in temperature, humidity or dryness can have serious effects upon it. The moon therefore, given the important power that its trajectory exerts on the atmosphere, is likely to act most on people whose nervous fibres are particularly delicate:
“Madness is an exclusively nervous condition, and the brain of a madman must therefore be infinitely more susceptible to the influence of the atmosphere, which itself undergoes considerable changes of intensity as a result of the different positions of the moon relative to the earth.” [Daquin, Philosophie de la folie, Paris, 1792]
"""
(Michel Foucault, History of Madness)

@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2025-09-10 20:30:36

And when all these mechanisms — the “more just, more human systems” I’m talking about — fail to do their job, what can we do? Go to war, I guess? But I’m not happy about that. I don’t like war.
I am quite willing to celebrate a world without Kirk if in fact that’s what we get. (Last I heard was “critical condition.”) But I can’t get •that• happy about it. Whether we celebrate his death or denounce gun violence — both are important, both are appropriate! — we must above all notice the failure of everything that should have prevented us from even getting here. •That• is the real crisis.
/end

Scientists have successfully used human stem cells
to patch a hole in a monkey's retina,
restoring the primate's vision and marking a successful step forward in the quest to treat age-related vision loss.
As detailed in a study published this month in the journal Stem Cell Reports,
the team led by Michiko Mandai at the Kobe City Eye Hospital in Japan 
focused on fixing what's called a macular hole,
an ocular condition associated with aging.

@timfoster@mastodon.social
2025-09-01 08:20:00

Two posts in my timeline just now that pretty much cover the human condition.

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-26 09:23:16

Humans Perceive Wrong Narratives from AI Reasoning Texts
Mosh Levy, Zohar Elyoseph, Yoav Goldberg
arxiv.org/abs/2508.16599 arxiv.org/pdf/25…

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-20 09:41:20

The AI-Fraud Diamond: A Novel Lens for Auditing Algorithmic Deception
Benjamin Zweers, Diptish Dey, Debarati Bhaumik
arxiv.org/abs/2508.13984

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-21 08:41:40

Principles and Reasons Behind Automated Vehicle Decisions in Ethically Ambiguous Everyday Scenarios
Lucas Elbert Suryana, Simeon Calvert, Arkady Zgonnikov, Bart van Arem
arxiv.org/abs/2507.13837

@arXiv_physicsmedph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-22 08:49:30

T2 Radiomic Features Are More Sensitive Than Mean T2 for Cartilage Load Response: A Stress MRI Study
Teresa Lemainque, Philipp Schad, Simon Westfechtel, Marc von der St\"uck, Robert Siepmann, Axel Honn\'e, Christiane Kuhl, Daniel Truhn, Sven Nebelung
arxiv.org/abs/2508.15309