Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-05-18 17:51:22

The thesis I was reading spent the majority of it's time focused on John Boyd's OODA loop as a tool for critical analysis in high pressure or constrained situations. Table top exercises could also benefit from using these steps to slow down the thought process, expose what's actually happening, and sharpen these tools.
So each step could start by observing (which is generally what the GM will tell you, but you may ask additional questions to refine observational thinking). What do you look for in any given situation? How do you gather data? What sources do you use?
Next you would orient. Talk through this out loud. What does that data mean? How this fit what you already know, or does it challenge your assumptions? Are you observing something related to a previous action? What does that tell you about your previous action or actions? How do you turn the data you observed into intelligence you can act on? How do your observations narrow the options for the next possible action?
Then you decide your action. But you're not simply deciding, you're coming up with a hypothesis that your action will test. Anything you do is an opportunity to learn something about the world, about your situation, about the accuracy of the model you're using to make decisions. What belief does your next action imply? How will you know if that action was correct or incorrect? What observations would challenge your hypothesis? What observations would confirm it? Are those mutually exclusive, or are there additional observations or actions you must make to clarify things?
Then act. Finish your turn by choosing your action or actions (individually or collectively). Perhaps take a moment to write down notes, like what your observations, your hypothesis, and if you think your previous hypothesis was confirmed or refuted. You can review these all later to refine your thinking.
By exploring these ideas in a safe environment, you can train your brain to run through the process at high speed when under pressure. This helps you avoid panic. It's a lot like slowly practicing marshal arts moves until they become muscle memory, which then just happen without thought when needed.

What are the odds that Trump OK's Iranian tolls in the Strait if his family gets a cut?
bsky.app/profile/shipwreck75.b

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2026-06-10 16:16:04

Google introduces DiffusionGemma, an experimental 26B-parameter open model that uses text diffusion for faster text generation compared to autoregressive models (The Keyword)
blog.google/innovation-and-ai/

@ocrampal@mastodon.social
2026-05-09 08:32:59

Is AI becoming more human, or are we discovering just how much of our "intelligence" is actually uncritical automated thought?
ocrampal.com/the-inverted-turi

@fanf@mendeddrum.org
2026-05-09 08:42:02

from my link log —
GNU Recutils: a database management system using human-readable text files.
labs.tomasino.org/gnu-recutils/
saved 2020-01-26

@Mediagazer@mstdn.social
2026-05-13 23:30:45

YouTube announces a full slate of new and returning shows, including four new series from Alex Cooper's company and a global travel series from Trevor Noah (Tess Patton/The Wrap)
thewrap.com/media-platforms/st

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2026-06-12 19:25:52

Staff memo: Meta plans to limit employee token usage and encourage employees to use MetaCode, after internal AI spending forecasts reached billions for 2026 (Jyoti Mann/The Information)
theinformation.com/articles/to

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-07-13 07:12:44

Working in computer security, I've learned to be *real fucking careful* about this law and have heard of it being interpreted *very broadly.* If a client of mine described a system to circumvent access restrictions like this I would fire them. But assuming I didn't fire them, I would
1) tell them to shut it down immediately
2) tell them to talk to a lawyer.
LLMs, as a class of user, are clearly not authorized to access the information. By circumventing access controls, they have "knowingly accessed a computer without authorization." Those access restrictions exist to protect against various damages, including bandwidth use and "intellectual property theft" (another concept I'm not a fan of, but anyway). By violating those restrictions they could open themselves up to legal liability.
Now, IANAL. My job is to describe risk. That's a sufficient risk. It actually doesn't even matter if you'd win the case in the end, a lot of people just can't afford to fight.
But, in this case, it tends to be powerful people, for whom the law does not apply, abusing people who neither have the protection of the law nor the money to just ruin someone's life with a flood of lawyers.
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18

Stuart Russell:
I have been developing AI technology for 50 years. And I believe that, in many respects, we have not properly thought through what we are actually doing.
It is as if we had been working on nuclear energy without ever considering how to prevent the reactor from exploding. Our entire way of thinking has been misguided.