Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@deprogrammaticaipsum@mas.to
2025-04-06 18:55:15

"Quite simply, if you have not read this book yet, read it. If you have a colleague who has yet to read it, get them a copy. If someone asks you what one book to read about software engineering, it is this one. It is not Code Complete, Second Edition, nor is it Clean Code, nor any other book that claims to teach you how to get software right the first time around (you will not)."
deprogrammaticaipsum.com/micha

@grifferz@social.bitfolk.com
2025-06-05 22:36:57
@cosmos4u@scicomm.xyz
2025-06-06 19:12:36

Some statistics about all robotic #LunarLanding attempts so far from 1965 to 2025 compiled from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ and scicomm.xyz/@AkaSci@fosstodon. in which I only count those for which descent to the surface had been initiated, not missions lost at launch or on the way - in a nutshell ~70% of all landings by government agencies went well (essentially the same rate 60 years ago and now!) but only ~30% by private companies. Here goes ...
There have been two separate periods of soft lunar landing attempts of ca. a dozen years each, from 1965 to 1976 and 2013 to 2025 (ongoing) with a huge gap between them.
In the first interval there were 20 attempts with 13 successes (Luna 9, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 24 and Surveyor 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7), one partial success (Luna 23, counting as 50%) and 6 failures (Luna 5, 7, 8, 15 and 18 and Surveyor 4), so the success rate was 13.5/20 = 68 %. All missions were by - the Soviet and U.S. - governments.
In the second interval there were so far 14 attempts with 6 full successes (Chang'e-3, 4, 5 and 6, Vikram 2 and Blue Ghost), three partial successes (SLIM, IM-1 and 2, counting as 75%, 50% and 25%, respectively) and 5 failures (Beresheet, Vikram 1, Hakuto-R 1 and 2 and Luna 25) so the success rate was 7.5 / 14 = 54%.
But looking only at the government missions it was 72%, slighly up from 50 years ago. While for the commercial attempts it was only 29%. In total the success rate was 19 (18 government-run) missions out of 34 (28) attempts or 62% but 69% for governments only. And if you throw in the 6 Apollo landings, the total success rate rises to 68% and the government-only rate goes even up to 75%.

@danyork@mastodon.social
2025-06-05 21:15:35

Just a reminder... if you ever had your DNA tested through #23AndMe … all your DNS data is now up for sale to the highest bidder…
gizmodo.com/23andme-re-opens-d

@YaleDivinitySchool@mstdn.social
2025-05-06 20:55:07

The new Quadcast episode is also available on YouTube if you don't download podcasts. The Spread of Christianity in the Greek and Roman Empires with Professor Teresa Morgan youtu.be/ggjDX0Gcdg4

@blakes7bot@mas.torpidity.net
2025-06-06 18:28:06

Series D, Episode 09 - Sand
AVON: Let's get going.
REEVE: Fine landing, Chasgo. You certainly put the lady out of business. [To Servalan] If there is anyone on this planet, you'll have to leave them to me now.
blake.torpidity.net/m/409/37 B7B5

Claude Sonnet 4.0 describes the image as: "This scene appears to be set on a futuristic spacecraft bridge or control room, characterized by the sleek white and metallic control panels and the distinctive yellow and black striped walls typical of the series' production design. The setting has that clinical, high-tech aesthetic common to science fiction television of the era.

The scene shows four characters in elaborate costumes. Two figures in the foreground are wearing ornate black and white o…
@todbot@mastodon.social
2025-06-05 20:29:57

I really feel for JLCPCB. With all the visible strike-throughs on their tariff FAQ, you can see they're *trying* to keep track of the febrile toddler's changes, but seem to have just given up back mid-May jlcpcb.com/help/article/us-tar

partial screenshot of the US tariff policy faq showing multiple edits
‪@todbot@mastodon.social‬
2025-06-05 20:29:57

I really feel for JLCPCB. With all the visible strike-throughs on their tariff FAQ, you can see they're *trying* to keep track of the febrile toddler's changes, but seem to have just given up back mid-May jlcpcb.com/help/article/us-tar

@pixelcode@social.tchncs.de
2025-06-05 22:25:31
Content warning: SimpleX founder approving of right-wing extremism

Today, I learned that the founder of the #SimpleX messenger is a #ClimateChange-denying #Covid conspiracy-theorist, anti-vaxxer and

Twitter profile of Evgeny Poberezkin, the founder of SimpleX and creator of the Ajv JSON validator. Viewed via the Nitter server XCancel. On 30 May, Evgeny retweeted a post from Andrew Bridgen which reads:

“It was a military operation across the world from the development of the virus and so-called vaccines to the delivery of the propaganda narrative to increase compliance.”

Bridgen's tweet quotes an image shared by Liz Churchill, reading: “Dutch government official admits Covid pandemic …
On 28 May, Evgeny retweeted a post from Sayer Ji reading:

“Americans Are Fed Up! In just 24 hours, over 20,000 emails have been sent to Congress demanding an investigation into unauthorized geoengineering and atmospheric spraying. People are taking a stand for transparency, accountability, and the right to clean skies.”
On 16 March, Evgeny Poberezkin retweeted JD Vance's screenshot of Donald Trump's Truth Social post with a picture showing three presidential photos:

2017 – 2021: happy Trump
2021 – 2025: a robot pen faking Biden's signature
2025 – present: mad Trump
On 26 February, Evgeny Poberezkin retweeted a post from the Twitter profile “Bill Gates is a psycho”, reading:

“That’s where the money is. There is no consensus in Science, it’s about facts, and if you get down to the cold hard facts – climate change is not happening – there is no man made Global Warming now & there hasn’t been any in the past. I resent you calling me a ‘Denier” this is a word meant to put me down - there is NO significant Global Warming. John Coleman is a Meteorological exp…
@deprogrammaticaipsum@mas.to
2025-05-05 18:16:54

"Mary Maxwell Gates, Bill’s mother, was appointed to the board of directors of the national United Way in 1980. And guess who else was in that committee? The late John Opel, president, chairman, and CEO of…, you guessed it, IBM, between 1974 and 1986."
deprogrammaticaipsum.com/gary-