Tootfinder

Pieter is aan het radikaliseren, dat is duidelijk, het is bijna of ik mezelf hoor spreken, al moet ik er in alle bescheidenheid bij zeggen dat hij het leuker weet te brengen.
Mag het óók weer eens over het klimaat gaan? | De Druktemaker | NPO Radio 1 - YouTube
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aQRIIUgy

Erg leuk om deze in het licht van de afgelopen week nog eens terug te kijken.
Zeven jaar oud!
#Jetten
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUdX-3m4Wuc

Are there any Star Trek nerds around? You might be interested in a recent panel at this year @… Supercon. Enjoy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFgTwC0WEvo

Ich bin ja in der Welt des Cellos nicht zu Hause, aber das ist immer noch die beeindruckendste Performance, die mir bislang untergekommen ist (Solo ab Min. 3:33).
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8fe4hfmiUo&pp=ygUbbG91IHJlZWQgdmVudXMgaW4gZnVycyBsaX…

Series C, Episode 12 - Death-Watch
VINNI: You're not good enough to get past me, Tarrant.
DEETA: You're going to look pretty silly flat on your back with a face full of footprints.
https://blake.torpidity.net/m/312/213 B7B3

[BLOG] BitBastelei #658 – Schlechte-Witze-Buzzer https://www.adlerweb.info/blog/2025/08/24/bitbastelei-658-schlechte-witze-buzzer/

Actually, I do want to come back to masculinity under patriarchy and whiteness under white supremacy because I think it's worth talking more about. The "man" under patriarchy (at least "Western" patriarchy) is represented as power and independence. The man needs nothing and thus owes nothing to anyone. The man controls and is not controlled, which is intimately related to independence as dependence can make someone vulnerable to control. The image of "man" projects power and invulnerability. At the same time "man" is a bumbling fool who can't be held accountable for his inability to control his sexual urges. He must be fed and cared for, as though another child. His worst behaviors must be dismissed with phrases such as "boys will be boys" and "locker room talk." The absurdity of the concept of human "independence" is impossible to understate.
Even if you go all Ted Kaczynski, you have still been raised and taught. This is, perhaps, why it is so much more useful to think in terms of obligations than rights. Rights can be claimed and protected with violence alone, but obligations reveal the true interdependence that sustains us. A "man" may assert his rights. Yet, on some level, we all know that the "man" of patriarchy acts as a child who is not mature enough to recognize his obligations.
White violence and white fragility reflect the same dichotomy. "The master race" somehow always needs brown folks to make all their shit and do all the reproductive labor for them. For those who fully embrace whiteness, the "safe space" is a joke. DEI shows weakness. Yet, when presented with an honest history adults become children who are incapable of differentiating between criticism and simple facts. *They* become the ones who must be kept safe. The expectation to be responsible for one's own words and actions, one of the very core definitions of being an adult, is far too much to expect. Their guilt needs room, needs tending, needs caring. White people cannot simply "grow the fuck up" or, as they may say of slavery, "fucking get over it."
And again, interestingly, it is *rights* that they reference: "Mah Freeze PEACH!" I find it hard to distinguish between such and my own child's assertion that anything she doesn't like is "not fair!" No, these assertions fail to recognize the fundamental fabric of adult society: the obligations we hold to each other.
At the intersection of all privilege is the sovereign, the ultimate god-man-baby. Again, referencing the essay (https://hexmhell.writeas.com/observations-on-domination-and-trump)
> This is where it becomes important to consider the ideology behind the sovereign ritual. Participation within the sovereign ritual denotes to the participants elements of the sovereign. That is, all agents of the sovereign are, essentially, micro dictators. By carrying out the will of the sovereign, these micro dictators can, by extension, act outside of the law.
While law enforcement is the ultimate representative of sovereign violence, privileges allow a gradated approximation of the sovereign. Those who are "closer" in privilege to the sovereign may, for example, be permitted to carry out violence against those who are father away. The gradation of privilege turns the whole society, except for the least privileged, into a cult that protects the privilege system on behalf of the most privileged. (And immediately Malcolm X pops to mind as having already talked about part of this relationship in 1963 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf7rsCAfQCo.)

Graziano: Don't be surprised if these 32 things happen, from an MVP run to rookies who could star https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46079215/2025-nfl-surprise-predictions-32-teams-stat-leaders-breakouts-fantasy-footb…

Meeting at Google: “We haven’t fucked up the Web enough with our AMP shit, but the AI shit is doing pretty good work. What about if we also fuck up RSS?”
What an utterly shit company. I hope the AI hype destroys them.
(Just in case you think they're "just asking questions", they already opened a removal tracker before listening to replies: https://issues.chromium.org/issues/435623334)
https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/11523

In Otter News (@inotternews)
https://substack.com/@inotternews/note/c-156864283?r=e4myx
> I just find everything feels a bit better when I watch this.