2026-08-06 08:42:04
from my link log —
Nehir: a scrolling tiling window manager for macOS.
https://github.com/apphane-dev/nehir
saved 2026-08-05 https://dotat.at/:/996…
from my link log —
Nehir: a scrolling tiling window manager for macOS.
https://github.com/apphane-dev/nehir
saved 2026-08-05 https://dotat.at/:/996…
Yes on I kickoff today in Duboce Park was a huge success! That’s (1) our campaign manager Jacob speaking, (2) Deepa Varma from Tenants Together, (3) Kristin Hardy from SEIU 1021, who talked about how affordable housing is their top, top, top, top priority to keep their members in the city.
Afterward we asked shops if we could put up signs. Donate or find the next volunteer event at
For those that don't know, I help run a large women in technology chat group on Slack. It's been going for 11 years now! (ask me for an invite if you want one and that's appropriate!)
It has deeply shaped how I think about technology, especially the social side. There is so much embodied knowledge in that community, it's amazing. And it's also such a window into how much the mainstream of technology writing is dominated by men. We talk about it differently! We're much more likely to be critical, and to be critical of the _structures_ in tech. Sometimes that comes off as kneejerk "Ugh BRIAN!" to some of the bullshit men to do women in the workplace, but also embedded underneath is an understanding of rarely-mapped power structures in the field. So much advice out there is written assuming that there is no dissent, no silent frustration, no quiet abandoning the job when the pressures are unresolved. And so much of the tech world, press and on social media alike, has no insight that this attrition even happens.
Women, collectively, though, understand it. We notice the patterns of promotions. We understand the way that if we're in our 40s, we're rather likely to have a manager who is a decade younger than we are, with no particular experience. We notice when men are lauded for spending time with their family instead of work on occasion, but women are expected to be present at all times and rarely seen positively for doing the exact same things.
And yet, any given instance is always shrouded in deniability. The pattern generally holds, but is this one my fault? Do I not measure up? Or is it sexism?
That's what these structures rob from us: we never have the clarity in feedback that it is accurate, that is us that must change. When we stick to our guns, are we being obstinate, or are we correct? That information is denied to us by sexism. It only becomes clear in aggregate, and even then it is very hard to find action to take on it except to acknowledge it and move on.
I don't think people talk about that ambiguity enough: we're always looking for the clear sexism, the man speaking over the women, the trading sexual favors for advancement, the clear pattern of pet-to-threat that so many women experience as they age or gain skill in the field. But the bulk of sexism that we experience is in the structural poisoning of feedback.
A tip (unsolicited): if you want to make your Hyprland look stunning use these truly opensource configs. Stephan Raabe has been at it for 3 or 4 years now and he deserves the real credits (and JaKoolit, but he stopped). Highly recommended!
https://ml4w.com/os/
Not a bad X11 window manager... #Wordle
Wordle 1 872 4/6
⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
And no, my good people, that idea of the computer being “reshapable” is not only — not even primarily!! — about FOSS. Linux barely has this property any more than macOS or Windows does. Yes, it is technically possible to rewrite the window manager for yourself. But in practice? There’s a huge skills barrier — which is the result of a huge •customization interface• barrier — to wild reshaping by general users.
That’s an ethos far better embodied by closed-soucre Hypercard than by open-source Linux. It’s not about who has the source code or the legal right to change it; it’s about the range of tinkering affordances the software offers to everyone.
6/