Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@carloshr@lile.cl
2025-06-06 15:52:49

Vuelve Guns n' Roses a Chile este año
14 de octubre en el Parque Estadio Nacional. La preventa comieza el 11 de junio a las 11:00 hrs. y la venta general el 13 a las 11:30 por puntoticket.
🔗

Un cartel promocional para un concierto de Guns N' Roses en el Parque Estadio Nacional el 14 de octubre.  El cartel presenta una imagen impactante: una representación apocalíptica de una criatura roja y monstruosa emergiendo del planeta Tierra, rodeada de llamas y figuras pequeñas. El logo de Guns N' Roses se muestra en la parte superior en letras amarillas sobre un fondo oscuro y estrellado.  El logo de Banco Falabella, patrocinador del evento, aparece en la parte inferior, junto con la frase …
@joxean@mastodon.social
2025-06-06 14:24:22

«La tortura llega a tal nivel que cuando te dicen que vas a la cšrcel es un alivio» @…

@jdrm@social.linux.pizza
2025-06-06 05:35:34

"Roma no paga a traidores"
Musk se ha dejado una cantidad de dinero obscena en aupar a Trump a la casa Blanca. Ha mentido y manipulado. Ha ayudado a montar la mšquina del odio hacia migrantes, personas racializadas, LGTBIQ y cualquier pensamiento crítico contra MAGA. Ha sido un colaboracionista a fin de cuentas. Todo lo malo que le pase es poco para lo que se merece.
Y todo lo malo que le pase a Trump serš una infinitésima parte de lo que se merece.

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-06 12:45:11

So I've found my answer after maybe ~30 minutes of effort. First stop was the first search result on Startpage (millennialhawk.com/does-poop-h), which has some evidence of maybe-AI authorship but which is better than a lot of slop. It actually has real links & cites research, so I'll start by looking at the sources.
It claims near the top that poop contains 4.91 kcal per gram (note: 1 kcal = 1 Calorie = 1000 calories, which fact I could find/do trust despite the slop in that search). Now obviously, without a range or mention of an average, this isn't the whole picture, but maybe it's an average to start from? However, the citation link is to a study (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/322359) which only included 27 people with impaired glucose tolerance and obesity. Might have the cited stat, but it's definitely not a broadly representative one if this is the source. The public abstract does not include the stat cited, and I don't want to pay for the article. I happen to be affiliated with a university library, so I could see if I have access that way, but it's a pain to do and not worth it for this study that I know is too specific. Also most people wouldn't have access that way.
Side note: this doing-the-research protect has the nice benefit of letting you see lots of cool stuff you wouldn't have otherwise. The abstract of this study is pretty cool and I learned a bit about gut microbiome changes from just reading the abstract.
My next move was to look among citations in this article to see if I could find something about calorie content of poop specifically. Luckily the article page had indicators for which citations were free to access. I ended up reading/skimming 2 more articles (a few more interesting facts about gut microbiomes were learned) before finding this article whose introduction has what I'm looking for: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
Here's the relevant paragraph:
"""
The alteration of the energy-balance equation, which is defined by the equilibrium of energy intake and energy expenditure (1–5), leads to weight gain. One less-extensively-studied component of the energy-balance equation is energy loss in stools and urine. Previous studies of healthy adults showed that ≈5% of ingested calories were lost in stools and urine (6). Individuals who consume high-fiber diets exhibit a higher fecal energy loss than individuals who consume low-fiber diets with an equivalent energy content (7, 8). Webb and Annis (9) studied stool energy loss in 4 lean and 4 obese individuals and showed a tendency to lower the fecal energy excretion in obese compared with lean study participants.
"""
And there's a good-enough answer if we do some math, along with links to more in-depth reading if we want them. A Mayo clinic calorie calculator suggests about 2250 Calories per day for me to maintain my weight, I think there's probably a lot of variation in that number, but 5% of that would be very roughly 100 Calories lost in poop per day, so maybe an extremely rough estimate for a range of humans might be 50-200 Calories per day. Interestingly, one of the AI slop pages I found asserted (without citation) 100-200 Calories per day, which kinda checks out. I had no way to trust that number though, and as we saw with the provenance of the 4.91 kcal/gram, it might not be good provenance.
To double-check, I visited this link from the paragraph above: sciencedirect.com/science/arti
It's only a 6-person study, but just the abstract has numbers: ~250 kcal/day pooped on a low-fiber diet vs. ~400 kcal/day pooped on a high-fiber diet. That's with intakes of ~2100 and ~2350 kcal respectively, which is close to the number from which I estimated 100 kcal above, so maybe the first estimate from just the 5% number was a bit low.
Glad those numbers were in the abstract, since the full text is paywalled... It's possible this study was also done on some atypical patient group...
Just to come full circle, let's look at that 4.91 kcal/gram number again. A search suggests 14-16 ounces of poop per day is typical, with at least two sources around 14 ounces, or ~400 grams. (AI slop was strong here too, with one including a completely made up table of "studies" that was summarized as 100-200 grams/day). If we believe 400 grams/day of poop, then 4.91 kcal/gram would be almost 2000 kcal/day, which is very clearly ludicrous! So that number was likely some unrelated statistic regurgitated by the AI. I found that number in at least 3 of the slop pages I waded through in my initial search.

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-06 07:35:30

Record-Breaking 1935.6 bit/s/Hz Spectral Efficiency in 19-Ring-Core Fiber Transmission of GMI-Estimated 25.24 Pb/s Capacity Using Low-Complexity 4x4 MIMO
Hualin Li, Junyi Liu, Jie Liu, Shuqi Mo, Haolin Zhou, Yuming Huang, Yining Huang, Lei Shen, Shuo Xu, Lei Zhang, Jie Luo, Zhaohui Li, Siyuan Yu
arxiv.org/abs/2506.04910

@arXiv_condmatmtrlsci_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-06 07:31:54

Pressure-Driven Metallicity in {\AA}ngstr\"om-Thickness 2D Bismuth and Layer-Selective Ohmic Contact to MoS2
Shuhua Wang, Shibo Fang, Qiang Li, Yunliang Yue, Zongmeng Yang, Xiaotian Sun, Jing Lu, Chit Siong Lau, L. K. Ang, Lain-Jong Li, Yee Sin Ang
arxiv.org/abs/2506.05133

@ruari@velocipederider.com
2025-07-06 19:49:37

This will give you some idea of the insanely low gearing on the 💎🏮🕯️👸🚴‍♀️
#TallBike #LamplighterPrincess #Lamplighter

Man cycles in a circle around a kids playground on a tallbike with tiny wheels and very low gearing, resulting in rather a lot of pedalling for very little movement.
@arXiv_mathNT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-06 09:52:25

This arxiv.org/abs/2505.03447 has been replaced.
initial toot: mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…

@arXiv_astrophHE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-06 07:28:44

Single-pulse-based interstellar scintillation studies of RRATs
Zi-wei Wu, Wei-wei Zhu, Zi-yao Fang, Qiu-yang Fu, Ji-guang Lu, Ling-qi Meng, Chen-Chen Miao, Xue-li Miao, Jia-rui Niu, Rukeya Rejiefu, Xun Shi, Chao Wang, Meng-yao Xue, Mao Yuan, You-ling Yue, Chun-feng Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Shi-jun Dang, Yu-lan Liu
arxiv.org/ab…

@blakes7bot@mas.torpidity.net
2025-06-06 18:28:06

Series D, Episode 09 - Sand
AVON: Let's get going.
REEVE: Fine landing, Chasgo. You certainly put the lady out of business. [To Servalan] If there is anyone on this planet, you'll have to leave them to me now.
blake.torpidity.net/m/409/37 B7B5

Claude Sonnet 4.0 describes the image as: "This scene appears to be set on a futuristic spacecraft bridge or control room, characterized by the sleek white and metallic control panels and the distinctive yellow and black striped walls typical of the series' production design. The setting has that clinical, high-tech aesthetic common to science fiction television of the era.

The scene shows four characters in elaborate costumes. Two figures in the foreground are wearing ornate black and white o…