Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

‪@mxp@mastodon.acm.org‬
2025-10-28 14:19:01

“Ethical safeguards”!? As if Elsevier knew anything about ethics. I’ve never published with Elsevier, nor will I, I’m not reviewing for you, and I’m most certainly not interested in your !@#$% spam.
The #BigPub cartels can go f✪ck themselves.

@mxp@mastodon.acm.org
2025-10-28 14:19:01

“Ethical safeguards”!? As if Elsevier knew anything about ethics. I’ve never published with Elsevier, nor will I, I’m not reviewing for you, and I’m most certainly not interested in your !@#$% spam.
The #BigPub cartels can go f✪ck themselves.

Screenshot of a spam message from Elsevier, titled “Is AI ready for peer review? Elsevier experts weigh in.”
@mxp@mastodon.acm.org‬
2025-08-13 11:21:01

Surprise, pas de surprise: The #BigPub cartels are demonstrating once again that they’re as reckless as the drug cartels.
scholar.social/@Iris/115020211

‪@mxp@mastodon.acm.org‬
2025-08-13 11:21:01

Surprise, pas de surprise: The #BigPub cartels are demonstrating once again that they’re as reckless as the drug cartels.
scholar.social/@Iris/115020211

@mxp@mastodon.acm.org
2025-08-13 11:21:01

Surprise, pas de surprise: The #BigPub cartels are demonstrating once again that they’re as reckless as the drug cartels.
scholar.social/@Iris/115020211

Iris van Rooij 💭 (@Iris@scholar.social)
"I thought, Huh?! This is definitely not how we — cognitive scientists — use that term. Then I saw the last sentence, “AI-generated definition”, and I realised what went wrong. This was AI slop. Not only that. It was AI slop on ScienceDirect, a “premier platform for scientific, health and technical literature” (...)" https://irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2025/08/12/ai-slop-and-the-destruction-of-knowledge/