Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@heiseonline@social.heise.de
2025-09-30 12:06:01

61.000 Bitcoin konfisziert: Chinesin gesteht Betrugskampagne in Großbritannien
Jahrelang hat eine Chinesin in ihrer Heimat Menschen Geld aus der Tasche gezogen. In Großbritannien wollte sie die Bitcoin ausgeben – und wurde festgenommen.

@cheryanne@aus.social
2025-12-29 20:04:27
@NFL@darktundra.xyz
2025-12-29 14:09:15

Source: Bears rookie WR Burden has quad injury espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/474433

@kexpmusicbot@mastodonapp.uk
2025-11-30 02:38:51

🇺🇦 #NowPlaying on KEXP's #Audioasis
Bratmobile:
🎵 You’re Fired
#Bratmobile
bratmobile.bandcamp.com/track/
open.spotify.com/track/4PIzcrr

@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2025-10-30 13:59:35

I recently found myself comparing the articles about the Louisiana Purchase on Britannica (that flag-bearer of acceptability in K-12 education) and Wikipedia (still forbidden in many schools). It was…illuminating.
The Britannica is better written. It flows well. It is approachable. It proceeds from broad overview to coherent detail in a way that helps meet the reader where they’re at. The professional editorial oversight shows.
1/

@NFL@darktundra.xyz
2025-12-29 14:11:40

Bears WR Luther Burden suffers quad injury in career performance, per report

cbssports.com/nfl/news/luther-

@kexpmusicbot@mastodonapp.uk
2025-10-30 06:39:50

🇺🇦 #NowPlaying on KEXP's #VarietyMix
Bratmobile:
🎵 Where Eagles Dare
#Bratmobile
bratmobile.bandcamp.com/track/
open.spotify.com/track/2PbApPm

@heiseonline@social.heise.de
2025-11-28 11:56:00

Steam Frame: Wie deutsche VR-Entwickler die VR-Brille bewerten
Kann Steam Frame der VR-Branche neuen Schwung verleihen? Wir haben deutsche VR-Entwickler gefragt, wie sie über die VR-Brille denken.

@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2025-10-30 14:18:23

I remember years ago seeing a study that diligently compared the factual accuracy of Britannica vs Wikipedia for a few select articles (will update this post w/link if I find it).
They found a similar rate of factual errors. The short of it: Wikipedia is chaotic and messy, but Britannica often had missing or out-of-date information. Wikipedia had higher noise, but also a higher correction rate. Factuality came out about a wash.
[UPDATE] I think it was this study: nature.com/articles/438900a
8/

@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2025-10-30 14:20:34

Wikipedia has •numerous• problems, but it belongs in education.
And right now, per the McSweeney’s OP, it’s a lifeboat of humanity in a sea of slop.
For reference, snapshots of the two articles concerned at the time of this writing:
web.archive.org/web/2025092312
web.archive.org/web/2025091701
/end