Tootfinder

Sources: Kalshi is targeting a December rollout for exchange-traded futures contracts tracking US inflation, rivaling exchanges like CME and ICE (Greg Ritchie/Bloomberg)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/20

Risque de forte affluence Š bord des trains :
- DEFI au départ de la gare La Verrière Š 17h35, arrivée Š 18h17 en gare de La Défense.
- VERI au départ de la gare La Défense Š 18h29, arrivée Š 19h11 en gare de La Verrière.
Motif : trains courts
🤖 21/10 17:39

I had to laugh-groan almost out loud at this passage:
❝Any effort to undermine the election will eventually resolve itself, whether through political compromise, contentious rulings from courts, the use of force or all three.❞
My dude…. OK, yes, it will definitely “eventually resolve itself” — if you also include the possibility of it doing so in the way that the collapse of democracy in Germany in the 1930s eventually “resolved itself.”
I guess technically WWII is encompassed by “the use of force.”
1/
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/21/opinion/trump-midterms-election-threats-ice-economy.html

Risque de forte affluence Š bord du train :
- DEFI au départ de la gare de La Verrière Š 16h05, arrivée Š 16h47 en gare de La Défense.
- VERI au départ de la gare de La Défense Š 16h59, arrivée Š 17h41 en gare de La Verrière.
- DEFI au départ de la gare de La Verrière Š 18h05, arrivée Š 18h47 en gare de La Défense. - VERI au départ de la gare de La Défense Š 18h59, arrivée Š 19h41 en gare de La Verrière.
Motif : trains courts.
🤖 19/10 15:48

I had to laugh-groan almost out loud at this passage:
❝Any effort to undermine the election will eventually resolve itself, whether through political compromise, contentious rulings from courts, the use of force or all three.❞
My dude…. OK, yes, it will definitely “eventually resolve itself” — if you also include the possibility of it doing so in the way that the collapse of democracy in Germany in the 1930s eventually “resolved itself.”
I guess technically WWII is encompassed by “the use of force.”
1/
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/21/opinion/trump-midterms-election-threats-ice-economy.html

So... First, this is a great example of the enemy of your enemy not being your friend:
https://todon.eu/@radical_chic/117427249480571937
I can hope that this will cause Adobe to help her the AI bubble popped sooner and/or that it breaks Adobe's market share, but I'm not going to use these tools, nor will I cheer too loudly if the result is that copyright restrictions actually get applied and stop LLM coding (even though stopping LLM coding is unambiguously good). (This is very much not a "clean room" implementation if Claude's training data includes any Adobe source, which it very well might.
Second, assuming this does not cause courts to suddenly start actually applying copyright law correctly, it represents a terrifying new reality for legacy software companies, given their dependence on software monopolies for a lot of their income. The people who have been building on open source all along have the better business model here, but this becoming the norm is more destructive than helpful to the open source movement, since "just rebuild it" seems easier than actually using or contributing to an existing open-source project.
That said, these tools are certainly full of serious bugs. They would be even if they had been written by humans in this timeframe, although in that case you'd probably have an order of magnitude fewer issues. These bugs will result in things like "if you open this PDF with the tool, your computer gets taken over by a virus". That occasionally happens with Adobe products too, of course, but it will happen more frequently and won't be fixed as fast/well in these tools.