from my link log —
DRAM errors and cosmic rays: space invaders or science fiction?
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16487
saved 2025-11-17 https://dotat.at/:…
Node.js devs, so picture this: you run `npm install` and you get a bunch of packages with audit errors.
The only thing I want to know at that point is what’s the root package that these dependencies belong to? (Running npm audit fix is a last resort as I don’t like it fiddling around with the dependencies of nested packages.)
It’s also not a straightforward thing to do, but it’s nothing jq and a bit of piping can’t fix:
```bash
npm audit --json | jq -r '.vulnerabil…
Meta warns of significant difficulties in identifying and removing underage users as it prepares for Australia's under-16 social media ban, set for December 10 (Angus Whitley/Bloomberg)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/20
@… @… I believe it logs the errors to console?
A IT-Sec Christmas / New Year again? 🤔
Is this: "Large ZIP files trigger spurious possible zip bomb errors" − https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/unzip/-/issues/3
…this again −
STM32MP2 PCIe update: I'm calling things brought up and working at this point.
Working on the test board now. It's going reasonably fast since a lot of it is cribbed from other projects and I already had made a sch symbol for the MP257 (although I found a few errors in it sinc eI had never actually made a board design around it or done a full design review).
Oh, how glad I am that I told Claude (command-line version) about `rename -n`. Seeing it iterate over half a dozen different regex patterns that might do what I wanted it to do, but were not quite right … lucky it could spot its errors before running the real thing.
Unprecedented errors are eroding the credibility of Trump's Justice Department (Sarah N. Lynch/Reuters)
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/unprecedented-errors-are-eroding-credibility-trumps-justice-department-2025-12-17/
http://www.memeorandum.com/251217/p12#a251217p12
Having just watched #Jaws for the first time in ages, I was stunned by the famous opening sequence ... but not by its cinematography or acting or editing - but by the never-ending chain of in-your-face #continuity errors in lighting once the girl enters the water: one moment we have a low Sun and a red sky, then we have the Sun near the zenith (with a day for night effect) then low again and so on, for several cycles.
Now #Spielberg, is there supposed to be some hidden message here? Well, there isn't.
(Once it's day, fortunately, this problem is gone, and a great movie unfolds, still fresh after 50 years. And I know, you shouldn't mess with a masterpiece, but Lucas added characters to Star Wars IV, and Cameron corrected a wrong star pattern in Titanic, so may be Spielberg could just, for an anniversary special edition ... o.k., I shut up. ;-)
VAR does its job, but I think its very presence allows the referee to underwhelm on the initial decision. He’s got cover, so why extend? It’s not supposed to be used in that manner, but I can understand why they do.
The natural question is if they are “clear and obvious errors”, how does an overturn affect PGMOL’s evaluation of a referees performance? I think it doesn’t, because PFMOL is corrupt and has no desire to improve. Just gaslight, baby. Gaslight.