Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@Techmeme@techhub.social
2026-01-22 12:15:39

Source: Google DeepMind signs a licensing deal with Hume AI, which builds emotionally intelligent voice interfaces, to hire CEO Alan Cowen and ~7 top engineers (Will Knight/Wired)
wired.com/story/google-hires-h

@heiseonline@social.heise.de
2026-04-21 13:28:00

Vertragsfehler: 75.000 Microsoft-Lizenzen in Hannover vorerst nutzlos
Eine Datenschutzvereinbarung für Microsoft 365 an Schulen in Hannover fiel nicht streng genug aus. Kann die Stadt die Nutzung der Software noch ermöglichen?

@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2026-03-21 15:41:22

The obvious answer is copyleft-type licenses.
(1) Has anybody done legal analysis on that beyond the obvious? I don’t think LLM training on copyleft code has been tested in court yet…? (Even LLM training on more restrictively licensed works seems to be surviving court challenge….)
(2) Are there copyleft licenses (i.e. “derived works must be similarly licensed”) out there that don’t have the Stink of Stallman on them? Or is GPL v3 still just the way to go despite the smell?
2/2

@Dragofix@veganism.social
2026-03-20 22:32:12

The US is looking at a year of chaotic weather #UnitedStates

@rainerzufall_le@mastodon.social
2026-01-22 09:29:28

Dieses Interview über Imperialismus und Eurozentrismus kann ich sehr empfehlen.
woz.ch/2604/gegen-alte-gewissh

@NFL@darktundra.xyz
2026-01-22 03:00:56

Rams' Davante Adams aims for first Super Bowl after losing previous four NFC title games: 'We just got to finish it off' nfl.com/news/rams-davante-adam

@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2026-03-21 16:49:43

OK, so apparently I shouldn’t have said “beyond the obvious,” and the obvious needs stating:
(1) Copyright licenses very clearly •do• allow the copyright holder to determine who may use a work and for what purposes, at least when such use would be otherwise prohibited without a license. That is how the law works. Rightly or wrongly, empires are built on this: “Streaming service XYZ may offer this song for streaming but not for download until this date.” Copyleft is one example of this principle in action.
(1a) Thing the thing presents discriminatory licensing (such as in Daniel’s strawmen) is anti-discrimination law, not copyright law.
(2) The reason copyleft specifically might prevent LLM usage is that •if• LLM output can be considered a derived work of the training material, then the output must also be licensed in the same way. That seems to me a thin reed: courts so far haven’t been willing to treat LLM output as derived work, even when the output includes things that would surely be considered plagiarism and grossly illegal if done by a human. But I don’t see another path to protection, and courts are still sorting this out…so.
mastodon.sdf.org/@dlakelan/116

@Dragofix@veganism.social
2026-02-21 23:27:11

Beef and lamb get 580 times more in EU subsidies than legumes, study finds theguardian.com/environment/20

@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2026-03-21 15:39:44

After my repeated posts / boosts arguing that in OSS we’ve overemphasized licenses and underemphasized community, governance, and sustainability…I actually have a license question:
What’s the current thinking on licenses that lay the legal groundwork for action against people using OSS source code for LLM training without seeking permission or offering compensation?
1/2

@Dragofix@veganism.social
2026-02-20 22:07:18

Foodrise Reveals: EU Spends Hundreds of Times More Subsidies on High-Emissions Beef and Dairy Than Legumes and Nuts vegconomist.com/agriculture-ag