Tootfinder

Hey Spiegel: BINGO! Hab ich was gewonnen?

RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@festal/116130845095836275
Been using waiting lists and lottery scripts for these things in the past... it's probably going to be a lot more common for more things/situations soon...

RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116125003113281014
Agreed

RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116133110963298035
I really can't get over how dumb this is.
"Yeah my job is worrying if a bunch of floating point numbers might be sad"

RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/115955906339726373
"AI" is not about productivity gains but about crushing labour.

RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/115960695879592730
I mean sure: Given enough abstraction we don't _know_ if AIs can feel. We also don't know if a book can feel. Or a broken glass. Or poop.
Gimme a highly paid job as corporate philosopher.…

Das wird sicher keinen Einfluss haben darauf, wie in Deutschland Forschung gefördert wird.
Eine CSU Ministerin würde niemals so shady shit abziehen.

When these kinds of hypemen are discarding a hype, it's really not going well.
https://www.threads.com/@profgalloway/post/DT-9mZnAcHE

Scott Galloway (@profgalloway) on Threads
Get as many people as possible to unsubscribe from OpenAI, from ChatGPT.

Studies showing that "AI" isn't creating the productivity gains that "AI" boosters promised are important but I think that they sadly don't help us win as much as some believe. We're winning at the wrong game:
https://tante.cc/2026/01/25/winning-the-wrong-g…

Winning the wrong game
With studies upon studies showing that actual measurable productivity gains through “AI” (which these days basically means chatbots) are really hard to come by and that “workslop” (meaning the extra work created for the rest of the organization by one person using “AI” lowering their work quality) eats up a lot of what might have […]

RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116126171849888717
I keep coming back to this quote. Almost every day TBH.