This https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00017 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arX…
I keep meeting students who feel they *must* test their variables for normality before analysis.
I tell them there's no need, & if the test tells them it's normal it's only because N is too small.
I decided to run some simulations to check, though, whether e.g., t-tests degraded more for non-normal data & small Ns.
I was a bit surprised by the result: CI coverage degrades for normal vars just as badly as other symmetric dists, but skewed distributions…
A Bayesian multilevel hidden Markov model with Poisson-lognormal emissions for intense longitudinal count data
S. Mildiner Moraga, E. Aarts
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12561
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12720 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_…
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16464 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_…
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.07698 has been replaced.
link: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=a
Modelling Global Fossil CO2 Emissions with a Lognormal Distribution: A Climate Policy Tool
Faustino Prieto, Catalina B. Garc\'ia-Garc\'ia, Rom\'an Salmer\'on G\'omez
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00653
Distinguishing subsampled power laws from other heavy-tailed distributions
Silja Sormunen, Lasse Leskel\"a, Jari Saram\"aki
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09614
Bayesian mass mapping with weak lensing data using KARMMA -- validation with simulations and application to Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data
Supranta S. Boruah, Pier Fiedorowicz, Eduardo Rozo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05484