I suspect we’re doing something similar to the tank classifier when we ascribe intelligence to AIs: there are patterns such as (for example) grammatical correctness which we •associate• with this abstract thing called “intelligence,” and we thus mis-infer the existence of everything else we associate with the notion of “intelligence” when we see (for example) correct grammar.
Or should we just call the machine intelligent because we classify it as intelligence because our brains, which we assume are intelligent, think it fits the pattern of intelligence? And now you see what the OP means about “begging the question of intelligence.”
Docs and interviews: Media Matters is struggling to survive, having racked up ~$15M in legal fees to defend itself from lawsuits by Elon Musk, the FTC, and AGs (New York Times)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/25/us/poli
Heute vor 20 Jahren: Am 27. Juni 2005 wurde im #Kernkraftwerk #FitzPatrick (USA) ein Riss im Torus entdeckt, der zu einer möglichen Gefährdung der Containment-Dichtigkeit führte (INES 1). Ein Notfall wurde ausgerufen und das Werk heruntergefahren, um Reparaturen durchzuführen.
Best bounds for the dual Hardy operator minus identity on decreasing functions
Achraf Ben Said, Gord Sinnamon
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02290 https://