Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@UP8@mastodon.social
2025-08-08 16:40:53

🎸 BAND-MAID's MIKU Kobato Talks About the Future and How the Band Decides on Album Names
animenewsnetwork.com/interview

@Mediagazer@mstdn.social
2025-10-08 08:01:07

A profile of Josh Wallace Kerrigan, also known as Neural Viz, a filmmaker using AI tools from Midjourney to Runway to create a cinematic universe (Christopher Beam/Wired)
wired.com/story/the-future-of-

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-09 10:36:42

Unlock giant nonreciprocity via multi-valued behavior of non-Hermitian zero-index materials
Yang Li, Yueyang Liu, Yucong Yang, Tianyi Zhang, Jianfeng Chen, Tian Dong, Fulong Shi, Phatham Loahavilai, Tianchi Zhang, Di Wu, Zixuan Wei, Dengfu Deng, Jun Qin, Longjiang Deng, Cheng-Wei Qiu, Lei Bi
arxiv.org/abs/2509.06121

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-08-07 00:24:12

There was once a machine that told you "you want this" and "this is good." It said, "there can be no better system and it's foolish to try to build one." That machine has long since failed to function. Now you choke on fumes as it is consumed by the wild flames of an abandoned cause.
That machine could not possibly work anymore because the evidence of it's falsehood has become too overwhelming.
No, only abject terror now can keep you from plotting your escape, from creating an alternative. No, the illusion has long since broken. All that's left now is triggering fight, flight, freeze as hard as possible. Most will be paralyzed, and those who fight can be used as an excuse to escalate the terror.
These are the final stages of a dying sun, expanding and consuming it's children before the final supernova.
There is no longer a stable system, no longer a system with a future. All that remains is the spectacle that hopes to distract you long enough that you too can be consumed, that it may sustain itself a few moments longer.

@knurd42@social.linux.pizza
2025-10-08 10:21:31

Anyone here that cares about all of the following or knows someone who does:
* #s390
* #Fedora
* #LinuxKernel
I'm wondering if its worth enabling s390 for some or all …

Screenshot from the top of the linked page
@arXiv_csIR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:31:02

Multi-Modal Multi-Behavior Sequential Recommendation with Conditional Diffusion-Based Feature Denoising
Xiaoxi Cui, Weihai Lu, Yu Tong, Yiheng Li, Zhejun Zhao
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05352

@metacurity@infosec.exchange
2025-08-05 16:44:33

@samsabin.bsky.social has the scoop on Jen Easterly's new gig. And huge shout out to Huntress.
axios.com/newsletters/axios-fu

Image of text that reads: Former CISA director Jen Easterly is joining the advisory board at cybersecurity company Huntress, the company announced today.

Why it matters: The news, shared exclusively with Axios, marks the first private sector role for Easterly since she left government — and her first job announcement since West Point rescinded her teaching job offer last week following far-right pressure.

What she's saying: "It was disappointing given my association with West Point — I was a …
@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-09-13 23:43:29

TL;DR: what if nationalism, not anarchy, is futile?
Since I had the pleasure of seeing the "what would anarchists do against a warlord?" argument again in my timeline, I'll present again my extremely simple proposed solution:
Convince the followers of the warlord that they're better off joining you in freedom, then kill or exile the warlord once they're alone or vastly outnumbered.
Remember that even in our own historical moment where nothing close to large-scale free society has existed in living memory, the warlord's promise of "help me oppress others and you'll be richly rewarded" is a lie that many understand is historically a bad bet. Many, many people currently take that bet, for a variety of reasons, and they're enough to coerce through fear an even larger number of others. But although we imagine, just as the medieval peasants might have imagined of monarchy, that such a structure is both the natural order of things and much too strong to possibly fail, in reality it takes an enormous amount of energy, coordination, and luck for these structures to persist! Nations crumble every day, and none has survived more than a couple *hundred* years, compared to pre-nation societies which persisted for *tends of thousands of years* if not more. I'm this bubbling froth of hierarchies, the notion that hierarchy is inevitable is certainly popular, but since there's clearly a bit of an ulterior motive to make (and teach) that claim, I'm not sure we should trust it.
So what I believe could form the preconditions for future anarchist societies to avoid the "warlord problem" is merely: a widespread common sense belief that letting anyone else have authority over you is morally suspect. Given such a belief, a warlord will have a hard time building any following at all, and their opponents will have an easy time getting their supporters to defect. In fact, we're already partway there, relative to the situation a couple hundred years ago. At that time, someone could claim "you need to obey my orders and fight and die for me because the Queen was my mother" and that was actually a quite successful strategy. Nowadays, this strategy is only still working in a few isolated places, and the idea that one could *start a new monarchy* or even resurrect a defunct one seems absurd. So why can't that same transformation from "this is just how the world works" to "haha, how did anyone ever believe *that*? also happen to nationalism in general? I don't see an obvious reason why not.
Now I think one popular counterargument to this is: if you think non-state societies can win out with these tactics, why didn't they work for American tribes in the face of the European colonizers? (Or insert your favorite example of colonialism here.) I think I can imagine a variety of reasons, from the fact that many of those societies didn't try this tactic (and/or were hierarchical themselves), to the impacts of disease weakening those societies pre-contact, to the fact that with much-greater communication and education possibilities it might work better now, to the fact that most of those tribes are *still* around, and a future in which they persist longer than the colonist ideologies actually seems likely to me, despite the fact that so much cultural destruction has taken place. In fact, if the modern day descendants of the colonized tribes sow the seeds of a future society free of colonialism, that's the ultimate demonstration of the futility of hierarchical domination (I just read "Theory of Water" by Leanne Betasamosake Simpson).
I guess the TL;DR on this is: what if nationalism is actually as futile as monarchy, and we're just unfortunately living in the brief period during which it is ascendant?

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:13:02

FCBV-Net: Category-Level Robotic Garment Smoothing via Feature-Conditioned Bimanual Value Prediction
Mohammed Daba, Jing Qiu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05153

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-09 10:08:12

A Screen-printed, Silver-nanowire-based Optically Transparent Wideband Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for 5G mmWave Applications
Yiming Yang, Mohammad Vaseem, Ruiqi Wang, Behrooz Makki, Atif Shamim
arxiv.org/abs/2509.05981