Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@fanf@mendeddrum.org
2025-07-19 17:42:03

from my link log —
Modern minimal perfect hashing: a survey.
arxiv.org/abs/2506.06536
saved 2025-06-11 dotat.at/:…

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-06 12:45:11

So I've found my answer after maybe ~30 minutes of effort. First stop was the first search result on Startpage (millennialhawk.com/does-poop-h), which has some evidence of maybe-AI authorship but which is better than a lot of slop. It actually has real links & cites research, so I'll start by looking at the sources.
It claims near the top that poop contains 4.91 kcal per gram (note: 1 kcal = 1 Calorie = 1000 calories, which fact I could find/do trust despite the slop in that search). Now obviously, without a range or mention of an average, this isn't the whole picture, but maybe it's an average to start from? However, the citation link is to a study (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/322359) which only included 27 people with impaired glucose tolerance and obesity. Might have the cited stat, but it's definitely not a broadly representative one if this is the source. The public abstract does not include the stat cited, and I don't want to pay for the article. I happen to be affiliated with a university library, so I could see if I have access that way, but it's a pain to do and not worth it for this study that I know is too specific. Also most people wouldn't have access that way.
Side note: this doing-the-research protect has the nice benefit of letting you see lots of cool stuff you wouldn't have otherwise. The abstract of this study is pretty cool and I learned a bit about gut microbiome changes from just reading the abstract.
My next move was to look among citations in this article to see if I could find something about calorie content of poop specifically. Luckily the article page had indicators for which citations were free to access. I ended up reading/skimming 2 more articles (a few more interesting facts about gut microbiomes were learned) before finding this article whose introduction has what I'm looking for: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
Here's the relevant paragraph:
"""
The alteration of the energy-balance equation, which is defined by the equilibrium of energy intake and energy expenditure (1–5), leads to weight gain. One less-extensively-studied component of the energy-balance equation is energy loss in stools and urine. Previous studies of healthy adults showed that ≈5% of ingested calories were lost in stools and urine (6). Individuals who consume high-fiber diets exhibit a higher fecal energy loss than individuals who consume low-fiber diets with an equivalent energy content (7, 8). Webb and Annis (9) studied stool energy loss in 4 lean and 4 obese individuals and showed a tendency to lower the fecal energy excretion in obese compared with lean study participants.
"""
And there's a good-enough answer if we do some math, along with links to more in-depth reading if we want them. A Mayo clinic calorie calculator suggests about 2250 Calories per day for me to maintain my weight, I think there's probably a lot of variation in that number, but 5% of that would be very roughly 100 Calories lost in poop per day, so maybe an extremely rough estimate for a range of humans might be 50-200 Calories per day. Interestingly, one of the AI slop pages I found asserted (without citation) 100-200 Calories per day, which kinda checks out. I had no way to trust that number though, and as we saw with the provenance of the 4.91 kcal/gram, it might not be good provenance.
To double-check, I visited this link from the paragraph above: sciencedirect.com/science/arti
It's only a 6-person study, but just the abstract has numbers: ~250 kcal/day pooped on a low-fiber diet vs. ~400 kcal/day pooped on a high-fiber diet. That's with intakes of ~2100 and ~2350 kcal respectively, which is close to the number from which I estimated 100 kcal above, so maybe the first estimate from just the 5% number was a bit low.
Glad those numbers were in the abstract, since the full text is paywalled... It's possible this study was also done on some atypical patient group...
Just to come full circle, let's look at that 4.91 kcal/gram number again. A search suggests 14-16 ounces of poop per day is typical, with at least two sources around 14 ounces, or ~400 grams. (AI slop was strong here too, with one including a completely made up table of "studies" that was summarized as 100-200 grams/day). If we believe 400 grams/day of poop, then 4.91 kcal/gram would be almost 2000 kcal/day, which is very clearly ludicrous! So that number was likely some unrelated statistic regurgitated by the AI. I found that number in at least 3 of the slop pages I waded through in my initial search.

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-18 10:21:51

Consistent View Alignment Improves Foundation Models for 3D Medical Image Segmentation
Puru Vaish, Felix Meister, Tobias Heimann, Christoph Brune, Jelmer M. Wolterink
arxiv.org/abs/2509.13846

@arXiv_eessSY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-18 09:15:41

A novel approach of day-ahead cooling load prediction and optimal control for ice-based thermal energy storage (TES) system in commercial buildings
Xuyuan Kang, Xiao Wang, Jingjing An, Da Yan
arxiv.org/abs/2509.13371

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 10:07:06

Weakly Supervised Vulnerability Localization via Multiple Instance Learning
Wenchao Gu, Yupan Chen, Yanlin Wang, Hongyu Zhang, Cuiyun Gao, Michael R. Lyu
arxiv.org/abs/2509.11312

@arXiv_mathAP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-10 08:36:01

Decay of small energy solutions in the ABCD Boussinesq model under the influence of an uneven bottom
Christopher Maul\'en, Claudio Mu\~noz, Felipe Poblete
arxiv.org/abs/2507.06487 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.06487 arxiv.org/html/2507.06487
arXiv:2507.06487v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The Boussinesq $abcd$ system is a 4-parameter set of equations posed in $\mathbb{R}_t\times\mathbb{R}_x$, originally derived by Bona, Chen and Saut as first order 2-wave approximations of the incompressible and irrotational, two dimensional water wave equations in the shallow water wave regime, in the spirit of the original Boussinesq derivation. Among many particular regimes, depending each of them in terms of the value of the parameters $(a,b,c,d)$ present in the equations, the generic regime is characterized by the setting $b,d>0$ and $a,c<0$. If additionally $b=d$, the $abcd$ system is hamiltonian. Previously, sharp local in space $H^1\times H^1$ decay properties were proved in the case of a large class of $abcd$ model under the small data assumption. In this paper, we generalize [C. Kwak, et. al., The scattering problem for Hamiltonian ABCD Boussinesq systems in the energy space. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 127 (2019), 121--159] by considering the small data $abcd$ decay problem in the physically relevant variable bottom regime described by M. Chen. The nontrivial bathymetry is represented by a smooth space-time dependent function $h=h(t,x)$, which obeys integrability in time and smallness in space. We prove first the existence of small global solutions in $H^1\times H^1$. Then, for a sharp set of dispersive $abcd$ systems (characterized only in terms of parameters $a, b$ and $c$), all $H^1\times H^1$ small solutions must decay to zero in proper subset of the light cone $|x|\leq |t|$.
toXiv_bot_toot

@blakes7bot@mas.torpidity.net
2025-09-07 06:20:42

#Blakes7 Series B, Episode 10 - Voice from the Past
AVON: You WILL leave it.
GLYND: Why not, it's already served its purpose in uniting us for the common cause. [Blake hands the box to Avon]
BLAKE: Acclaim it for that.

Claude Sonnet 4.0 describes the image as: "I can see this is a scene from a science fiction television series, showing what appears to be the interior of a spacecraft or futuristic facility. The setting has the characteristic look of late 1970s/early 1980s television production, with metallic surfaces and industrial-style lighting in the background. The person in the image is wearing what appears to be dark clothing typical of the series' costume design. The lighting and cinematography create a…
@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-14 08:53:22

Augmentation approaches for Mixed Integer Programming
Justo Puerto, Jose A. Ruiz-Alba
arxiv.org/abs/2507.08525 arxiv.…

@arXiv_eessIV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 09:30:17

An Interpretable Ensemble Framework for Multi-Omics Dementia Biomarker Discovery Under HDLSS Conditions
Byeonghee Lee, Joonsung Kang
arxiv.org/abs/2509.10527

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-08 14:30:21

AI for the Routine, Humans for the Complex: Accuracy-Driven Data Labelling with Mixed Integer Linear Programming
Mohammad Hossein Amini, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Shiva Nejati
arxiv.org/abs/2507.04990