Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@weltenkreuzer@social.tchncs.de
2025-11-08 20:52:29

Den aktuell ungenutzten Mini PC per #Yunohost zum eigenen kleinen Server machen. Mal schauen, was da so geht... :)
#selfhosting

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-20 23:22:58

So in another dream I just woke up from, I was talking to someone about "the idea problem" (that it's becoming harder to monitize ideas, from a vox article written by an AI cooked reporter).
iheart.com/podcast/105-it-coul
Basically, I was arguing that the majority of inventions target men because patriarchy puts economic control in men's hands. As men have started to help more with childcare, there have been more inventions related to childcare. (I don't have any idea if this is true. Seems legit, but I'm just relating my dream. I think I was also oversimplifying a bit to "men" and "women" because of my audience, but anyway it was a dream.) There's actually more low-hanging fruit, I pointed out, related to making care work easier.
So I argued that the real problem was a failure to invest in research into solving that problem. Today there are all these boondoggles built around killing people. What if, instead of all this government research into killing people, we dumped a ton of money into making it easier to support a household? That would be great for the economy. (Being asleep, I seem to have forgotten that working people need money.)
In the blur of being just awake I started thinking about how you could kickstart the US economy by taking the money from the AI boondoggle and other autonomous murder bots and create something like a program to build robots for housekeepers. You'd still be funding tech with government money, so the same horrible people get paid, but you're now actually solving real problems. It wouldn't even matter if it was a boondoggle, honestly. Just dumping money into something other than murdering people is good enough.
I imagined first if there was a program to fund a robot housecleaner, like robot dog with AI some laundry pickup, that would be provided, free of charge, to help people with children. It would work the same as the military boondoggle where a private company makes the government buy a piece of hardware from them and then also pay them to service it for some number of years. But instead of that hardware sitting around waiting to kill someone, it would be getting brought to people's houses to help them.
Then I thought, hey, you could even boost the economy more if you just had government funding for doulas and housecleaners and paid them a living wage. Hey, you could really kickstart the economy by nationalizing healthcare and including doula support as part of all births. Oh, and you could also just include the optional household help for families with children until the kids turn 18.
None of this is perfect (I don't actually think most of this is possible from any state), but the point is that it's actually wildly easy to figure out all kinds of ways to invest in the economy and monitize ideas as long as you aren't entirely focused on the same old "make money from spying on people and killing them." Funny that. Like they said in the podcast, maybe "finding ideas" isn't the problem.
Hope you enjoyed the weird semi-awake brain dump/rant.

@matematico314@social.linux.pizza
2025-11-30 05:06:34

Hoje eu vi os três gatos que ainda aparecem com frequência por aqui: a Escaminha, o Niniro e o clone do Niniro. Gangue praticamente completa, só que ficou faltando o Amarelinho (que parece ter desaparecido mesmo).
Só que o Niniro é muito dócil (eu acabo não resistindo a fazer um pouco de carinho nele) e ele jš fez menção a vir atršs de mim. Eu praticamente saí correndo rs.

Three powerful businessmen
—two Americans and a Russian
—hunched over a laptop in Miami Beach last month, ostensibly to draw up a plan to end Russia’s long and deadly war with Ukraine.
But the full scope of their project went much further, according to people familiar with the talks.
They were privately charting a path to bring Russia’s $2 trillion economy in from the cold
—with American businesses first in line to beat European competitors to the dividends.

@kctipton@mas.to
2025-10-30 10:01:13

Top researchers consider leaving U.S. amid funding cuts: ‘The science world is ending’ | PBS News pbs.org/newshour/show/top-rese &qu…

@detondev@social.linux.pizza
2025-12-10 14:39:26

Kimi Onoda, Japan's new Minister of State for Economic Security, is a 43 year old half-Irish ex-game industry PR femcel with an extensive history of defending her exclusive attraction to anime boys on twitter

I don't think it's twisted at all.

I'm a woman who likes men, and I'm not interested in 3D men.

That's all.
I apologize for rambling on. I just couldn't stay silent... I really wish I had more allies within the party...

From here on, this is completely my personal opinion, but fundamentally, people who truly love 2D wouldn't touch 3D at all. I myself have absolutely no interest in 3D and consider it out of bounds. Maybe that kind of feeling is something only those involved can understand.
"Hurry up and get married," "Have kids" I've been told this by voters since my 20s, but even at 40, I still sigh every time these words are thrown at me. At what age will I finally be free of this?

In the 3D world, I'm married to my country, and besides, I've said my private life is 2D-exclusive, haven't I!! I'll say it over and over: I'm 2D-exclusive!!
I've been saying this for a while now, but I don't consider 3D (real-life) people as romantic prospects. I'm dead serious, not joking. For me, the very act of someone seeing the "possibility of marriage" in me is inherently uncomfortable (quoted from a reply)-it's the same as if you were to suggest to a gay person that they marry someone of the opposite sex... If you can understand it that way, that would help. This isn't about sexual harassment or anything like that; it's a deep-seated discomf…
@markhburton@mstdn.social
2025-12-16 13:49:59

Marx's Theory of Value at the Frontiers Classical Political Economics, Imperialism and Ecological Breakdown
By Güney Işıkara, Patrick Mokre
I'd be interested in reading this, but £116 for 200 pages?
The piss is being taken, along with the money.
Marx's Theory of Value at the Frontiers: Classical Political Economics

@ukraine_live_tagesschau@mastodon.social
2025-10-24 10:30:46

Kreml: Prüfen westliche Sanktionen
Russland will nach Angaben des Präsidialamts die neuen westlichen Sanktionen prüfen und strikt im Sinne der eigenen Interessen reagieren. "Im Moment analysieren wir die beschlossenen und angekündigten Maßnahmen und werden natürlich tun, was unseren eigenen Interessen am besten entspricht", sagt Kreml-Sprecher Dmitri Peskow.
Die USA hatten kürzlich Sanktionen gegen die Ölkonzerne Lukoil und …
📑

@Dragofix@veganism.social
2025-12-22 01:17:06

Fossil fuel industry's 'climate false solutions' reinforce its power, aggravate environmental injustice, study suggests phys.org/news/2025-12-fossil-f

@vosje62@mastodon.nl
2025-12-12 18:10:57

Topadviseur Peter Wennink over de toekomst van Nederland: ‘Nu zijn we nog rijk, maar straks komt de man met de hamer’ | de Volkskrant
volkskrant.nl/economie/topadvi
Een heel lang interview, maar dit pak ik er even uit.
Al heel lang moet Nederland keuzes maken: -alles kan niet-, dat wordt een puinhoop, zoals het nu al een tijd aan het worden is.
Daarvoor hebben we -gewoon- een heel breed kabinet nodig wat op ruime steun kan rekenen en dat bereid is om -in overleg- tot afgewogen keuzes te komen.