2026-05-05 20:32:36
“Co-Authored-By: Copilot”
I was ignoring Microsoft and their "free" editor before it was cool. It is just funny how many people felt the need to tell me how greybeard, backward and uncool I am when using #neovim
“Co-Authored-By: Copilot”
I was ignoring Microsoft and their "free" editor before it was cool. It is just funny how many people felt the need to tell me how greybeard, backward and uncool I am when using #neovim
You don't have to leave your Zellij session, or install anything, to share it across CGNAT! All you need to do is run:
```
ssh -R 80:localhost:8082 demo.sandhole.com.br
```
And thanks to Sandhole (https://sandhole.com.br), you get your own (temporary) HTTPS subdomain with zero config!
I've been attempting to configure Vim-Classic in a way that works for my taste.
https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/vim-classic/
This is Drew Devault's fork of Vim from around 8.2, before the codebase was tainted by llm commits. I've been using Neovim long enough that I got really used to Lua …
TIL: Incremental selection is available by default in Nvim 0.12, see `:help v_in`.
#neovim
It feels obvious that llm's have no place in free and open source software. Apparently it isn't, at least not to everyone. I recently became interested in exploring the scope of the problem after finding out that both Vim and Neovim not only don't have policies banning llm contribution, but already contain fairly significant amounts of llm generated code.
It's funny and sad at the same time to see Claude Code struggling with the same problems I do as a software developer.
The latest incarnation was that it got the design wrong because it could not get through the reflection- and annotation-heavy Java Spring Boot code. Pointing it to the equivalent explicit code in Go made it clear.
My human feedback would be rejected because I am, lazy, grumpy, using neovim and not smart enough to understand the "beauty" of a Spring …